On the similarity between ranking vectors in the pairwise comparison method

References

• Barzilai, J. (1997). Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(12), 1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.2307/3010752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, S., & Fülöp, J. (2018). Efficient weight vectors from pairwise comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, S., Fülöp, J., & Koczkodaj, W. W. (2011). An LP-based inconsistency monitoring of pairwise comparison matrices. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54(1–2), 789–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.03.026
   Google Scholar
• Brunelli, M. (2018). A survey of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. International Journal of General Systems, 47(8), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2018.1523156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli, M. (2019). A study on the anonymity of pairwise comparisons in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(2), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, E. U., & Wedley, W. C. (2004). A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Computers & Operations Research, 31(6), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00042-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomer, J. M. (2013). Ramon Llull: From ‘Ars electionis’ to social choice theory. Social Choice and Welfare, 40(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0598-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condorcet, M. (1785). Essay on the application of analysis to the probability of majority decisions. Imprimerie Royale.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, G. B. (1987). The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgement matrix. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90489-1
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, R., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, H. A. (1969). The method of paired comparisons. A Charles Griffin Book.
   Google Scholar
• Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der psychophysik. Breitkopf und Härtel.
   Google Scholar
• Gacula, M. C., Jr. & Singh, J. (1984). Statistical methods in food and consumer research. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gantmaher, F. R. (2000). The theory of matrices. American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Golany, B., & Kress, M. (1993). A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 69(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90165-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker, P. T. (1987). Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling, 9(11), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90503-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefnawy, E. A., & Mohammed, A. S. (2014). Review of different methods for deriving weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6(1), 92–123.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, M. W., & Koczkodaj, W. W. (1996). A Monte Carlo study of pairwise comparison. Information Processing Letters, 57(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(95)00185-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonsky, J. (2015). Analysis of selected prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 622(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/622/1/012033
   Google Scholar
• Janicki, R., & Koczkodaj, W. W. (1996). A weak order approach to group ranking. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 32(2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(96)00102-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakiashvili, T., Koczkodaj, W. W., & Magnot, J. P. (2017). Approximate reasoning by pairwise comparisons. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. G. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30(1/2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81
   Google Scholar
• Koczkodaj, W. W. (1993). A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 18(7), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(93)90059-8
   Google Scholar
• Koczkodaj, W. W. (1998). Testing the accuracy enhancement of pairwise comparisons by a Monte Carlo experiment. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 69(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(97)00131-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koczkodaj, W. W., & Orłowski, M. (1999). Computing a consistent approximation to a generalized pairwise comparisons matrix. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 37(3), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00048-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., & Lin, C. (2014). A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K. (2015). On the properties of the priority deriving procedure in the pairwise comparisons method. Fundamenta Informaticae, 139(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2015-1240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K. (2020). Understanding the analytic hierarchy process. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K., & Kedzior, A. (2016). Some remarks on the mean-based prioritization methods in AHP. In N.-T. Nguyen, L. Iliadis, Y. Manolopoulos, & B. Trawiński (Eds.), Lecture Notes In Computer Science, Computational Collective Intelligence: 8th International Conference, ICCCI 2016, Halkidiki, Greece, September 28–30, 2016. Proceedings, Part I (pp. 434–443). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K., Mazurek, J., Ramík, J., & Soltys, M. (2019). When is the condition of order preservation met? European Journal of Operational Research, 277(1), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K., Szybowski, J., & Prusak, A. (2019). Towards quantification of incompleteness in the pairwise comparisons methods. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 115, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K., & Talaga, D. (2020). Inconsistency indices for incomplete pairwise comparisons matrices. International Journal of General Systems, 49(2), 174–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2020.1713116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurek, J., & Ramík, J. (2019). Some new properties of inconsistent pairwise comparisons matrices. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 113, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. L., & Brown, T. C. (1998). Economic valuation by the method of paired comparison, with emphasis on evaluation of the transitivity axiom. Land Economics, 74(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton, S. S., & McAleer, C. A. (1976). Influence of client diagnosis – cancer – on counselor decisions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23(6), 575–578. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.23.6.575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L. R. (2017). Psychometric methods theory into practice. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, D. G., & Merlin, V. R. (1996). The Copeland method. Economic Theory, 8(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990050077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGrawHill International Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making. Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors. The analytic hierarchy/network process. Estadística e Investigación Operativa/Statistics and Operations Research (RACSAM), 102, 251–318.
   Google Scholar
• Suzumura, K., Arrow, K. J., & Sen, A. K. (2010). Handbook of social choice & welfare. Elsevier Science Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1927). The method of paired comparisons for social values. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 21(4), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0065439
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1994). A law of comparative judgment, reprint of an original work published in 1927. Psychological Review, 101(2), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar