Nested analytic hierarchy/network process for two-stage consumer choice issues

References

• Adhami, A. Y., & Ahmad, F. (2020). Interactive pythagorean-hesitant fuzzy computational algorithm for multiobjective transportation problem under uncertainty. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 15(4), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2020.1783381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ak, M. F., & Gul, M. (2019). AHP–TOPSIS integration extended with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for information security risk analysis. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 5(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-018-0087-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini, A., & Alinezhad, A. (2017). Integrating DEA and group AHP for efficiency evaluation and identification of most efficient DMU. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 4(4), 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Asadabadi, M. R., Chang, E., & Saberi, M. (2019). Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process (ANP). Cogent Engineering, 6(1), 1623153. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153
   Google Scholar
• Asgari, M., Mashayekhan, A., & Ariapour, A. (2018). Indicator species for rangeland management by ANP-DEMATEL method (case study: Nahavand Rangeland). Journal of Rangeland Science, 8(3), 285–295.
   Google Scholar
• Bathaei, A., Mardani, A., Baležentis, T., Awang, S. R., Streimikiene, D., Fei, G. C., & Zakuan, N. (2019). Application of fuzzy analytical network process (ANP) and VIKOR for the assessment of green agility critical success factors in dairy companies. Symmetry, 11(2), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11020250
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. Y., & Huang, J. J. (2019). Deriving fuzzy weights of the fuzzy analytic network process via fuzzy inverse matrix. Mathematics, 7(10), 914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, C. R., & Jeong, H. Y. (2019). Quality evaluation for multimedia contents of e-learning systems using the ANP approach on high speed network. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(20), 28853–28875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7351-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehraj, P., Sharma, A., & Grover, P. S. (2019). Maintenance assessment guidelines for autonomic system using ANP approach. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 22(2), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2019.1580906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, J. F., Kollat, F., David, T., & Blackwell, R. (1968). Consumer behaviour. Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P. C. (1974). Exceptional paper—Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: A survey. Management Science, 20(11), 1442–1471. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.20.11.1442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontela, E. (1976). Industrial applications of cross-impact analysis. Long Range Planning, 9(4), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(76)90032-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1974). Events and economic forecasting models. Futures, 6(4), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(74)90076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y., Wang, Z., Lu, X., & Hu, B. (2020). Application of AHP to road selection. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications–A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W., & Ma, X. (2018). The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaloo, F., & Paydar, M. M. (2020). Optimizing a robust bi-objective supply chain network considering environmental aspects: A case study in plastic injection industry. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 15(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2019.1592720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Balkenborg, D., & Kaplan, T. (2011). Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(4), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Lusti, M. (2006). How to derive priorities in AHP: A comparative study. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 14(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-006-0012-9
   Google Scholar
• Istrate, S., Nestian, V., & Neagu, M. (2018). A company improvement analysis using the AHP and the ANP methods. Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati: Fascicle: I, Economics & Applied Informatics, 24(2), 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Karasan, A., Ilbahar, E., & Kahraman, C. (2019). A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and its application to landfill site selection problem. Soft Computing, 23(21), 10953–10968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3649-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A. U., & Ali, Y. (2020). ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) AND ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS METHODS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS: A TWENTY YEAR REVIEW FROM 2000-2019: AHP & ANP techniques and their applications: Twenty years review from 2000 to 2019. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3), 369–402. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i3.822
   Google Scholar
• Kheybari, S., Rezaie, F. M., & Farazmand, H. (2020). Analytic network process: An overview of applications. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 367, 124780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koczkodaj, W. W. (2016). Pairwise Comparisons Rating Scale Paradox. In Nguyen N.T., and Kowalczyk R. (eds), Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9655. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49619-0_1
   Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Ergu, D., & Shang, J. (2014). Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: Adapting Hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(1), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., & Lin, C. (2014). A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labella, Á., Dutta, B., & Martínez, L. (2021). An optimal best-worst prioritization method under a 2-tuple linguistic environment in decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 155, 107141–107141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRose, R., & Atkin, D. (1991). Attributes of movie distribution channels and consumer choice. Journal of Media Economics, 4(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997769109358200
   Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. (1949). Structural matrices of national economies. Econometrica, 17, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2020). Aggregation of the nearest consistency matrices with the acceptable consensus in AHP-GDM. Annals of Operations Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03572-1
   Google Scholar
• Liu, K., Liu, Y., & Qin, J. (2018). An integrated ANP-VIKOR methodology for sustainable supplier selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Granular Computing, 3(3), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-017-0071-4
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D., & Hausman, J. (1981). Specification tests for the multinominal logit model (No. 292). Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. Transportation Research Record, (673).
   Google Scholar
• Ozalp, M., Kucukbas, D., Ilbahar, E., & Cebi, S. (2020). Integration of quality function deployment with IVIF-AHP and Kano model for customer oriented product. Customer Oriented Product Design: Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques, 279, 93.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, A., Özkan, A., Günkaya, Z., & Banar, M. (2020). Decision-making for the selection of different leachate treatment/management methods: The ANP and PROMETHEE approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(16), 19798–19809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08524-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quezada, L. E., López-Ospina, H. A., Palominos, P. I., & Oddershede, A. M. (2018). Identifying causal relationships in strategy maps using ANP and DEMATEL. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 118, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, H., Salman Mahini, A., & Kamyab, H. R. (2019). Comparison of analytic network process (ANP) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method in land use planning based on multi objective land allocation (MOLA) method. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 10(2), 48–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, P. (1973). Independence of irrelevant alternatives. Econometrica, 41(5), 987–991. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisi, M., Afzali, A., & Aye, L. (2018). Applications of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytical network process (ANP) for industrial site selections in Isfahan, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(14), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7702-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGrawHill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process (Vol. 4922). RWS Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—The analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Routroy, S., & Desai, R. (2018). Retail location decision using an integrated DEMATEL-ANP method. International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), 9(1), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, V. (1988). A conjunctive‐compensatory approach to the self‐explication of multiattributed preferences. Decision Sciences, 19(2), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1988.tb00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H., & Tsaur, S. H. (1995). Energy demand forecast for motor freight transportation in Taiwan: Application of a dynamic interregional input-output model. Journal of Applied Input-Output Analysis, 2(2), 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warfield, J. N. (1976). Societal systems. Planning, policy and complexity. Cybernetics and System, 8(1), 113–115.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Qin, J., Liu, J., & Martinez, L. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection based on AHPSort II in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Information Sciences, 483, 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, D., Kou, G., Xu, Z., & Shi, S. (2021). Analysis of collaboration evolution in AHP research: 1982–2018. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 20(01), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020500406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Estimating priorities from relative deviations in pairwise comparison matrices. Information Sciences, 552, 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Chen, L., Pan, W., & Lu, Q. (2017). AHP-ANP–fuzzy integral integrated network for evaluating performance of innovative business models for sustainable building. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(8), 04017054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar