A hybrid AHPSort II and multi-objective portfolio selection method to support quality control in the automotive industry

References

• Abastante, F., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Lami, I. M., & Mecca, B. (2020). The introduction of the SRF-II method to compare hypothesis of adaptive reuse for an iconic historical building. Operational Research, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00611-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aissi, H., & Roy, B. (2010). Robustness in multi-criteria decision aiding. In Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis (pp. 87–121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_4
   Google Scholar
• Alfieri, A., Castiglione, C., & Pastore, E. (2020). A multi-objective tabu search algorithm for product portfolio selection: A case study in the automotive industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 142, 106382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhuraish, I., Robledo, C., & Kobi, A. (2016). Assessment of lean manufacturing and six sigma operation with decision making based on the analytic hierarchy process. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.550
   Google Scholar
• Almeida-Dias, J., Figueira, J. R., & Roy, B. (2010). Electre Tri-C: A multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(3), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida-Dias, J., Figueira, J. R., & Roy, B. (2012). A multiple criteria sorting method where each category is characterized by several reference actions: The Electre Tri-nC method. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(3), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, N. P., & Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00032-5
   Google Scholar
• Assumma, V., Bottero, M., Ishizaka, A., & Tasiou, M. (2021). Group analytic hierarchy process sorting II method: An application to evaluate the economic value of a wine region landscape. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 26(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-020-09744-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baidya, R., Dey, P. K., Ghosh, S. K., & Petridis, K. (2018). Strategic maintenance technique selection using combined quality function deployment, the analytic hierarchy process and the benefit of doubt approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(1–4), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9540-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbati, M., Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., & Panaro, S. (2021). A multiple criteria methodology for prioritizing and selecting portfolios of urban projects. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.10410.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barbati, M., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2018). Optimization of multiple satisfaction levels in portfolio decision analysis. Omega, 78, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bish, E. K., & Chen, W. (2016). The optimal resource portfolio under consumer choice and demand risk for vertically differentiated products. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canonico, P., De Nito, E., Esposito, V., Martinez, M., & Pezzillo Iacono, M. (2017). The adoption of knowledge integration mechanisms in an interdisciplinary research project. Management Research Review, 40 (5), 604–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2016-0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canonico, P., De Nito, E., Esposito, V., Pezzillo Iacono, M., & Consiglio, S. (2020). Knowledge creation in the automotive industry: Analysing obeya-oriented practices using the SECI model. Journal of Business Research, 112, 450–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carazo, A. F., Gómez, T., Molina, J., Hernández-Díaz, A. G., Guerrero, F. M., & Caballero, R. (2010). Solving a comprehensive model for multiobjective project portfolio selection. Computers & Operations Research, 37(4), 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B. (2020). Functional relations and Spearman correlation between consistency indices. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1516178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B., D’Apuzzo, L., Di Nola, A., Squillante, M., & Vitale, G. (2019a). A general framework for individual and social choices. In Models and theories in social systems (pp. 37–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00084-4_2
   Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B., D'Apuzzo, L., & Squillante, M. (2012). About a consistency index for pairwise comparison matrices over a divisible alo-group. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 27(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B., Ishizaka, A., Olivieri, M. G., & Squillante, M. (2019b). Comparing inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrices depending on entries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1464427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahid, M. T., El, A. J., Soulhi, A., & El, A. N. (2014). Performance measurement model for moroccan automotive suppliers using PMQ and AHP. Modern Applied Science, 8(6), 137. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v8n6p137
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Yu, J., & Khan, S. (2013). The spatial framework for weight sensitivity analysis in AHP-based multi-criteria decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 48, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. S., Figueira, J. R., & Borbinha, J. (2018a). A multiple criteria nominal classification method based on the concepts of similarity and dissimilarity. European Journal of Operational Research, 271(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. S., Govindan, K., & Figueira, J. R. (2018b). Supplier classification in emerging economies using the ELECTRE TRI-nC method: A case study considering sustainability aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 925–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. S., Lami, I. M., Greco, S., Figueira, J. R., & Borbinha, J. (2021). Assigning a house for refugees: An application of a multiple criteria nominal classification method. Operational Research, 21(4), 2651–2687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00508-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer, A., Baker, E., Liesiö, J., & Salo, A. (2018). A portfolio model for siting offshore wind farms with economic and environmental objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, L., Akpınar, M. E., Araz, C., & Ilgın, M. A. (2018). A green supplier evaluation system based on a new multi-criteria sorting method: VIKORSORT. Expert Systems with Applications, 114, 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., Matta, K. F., & Conlon, E. (2001). Product and service quality: The antecedents of customer loyalty in the automotive industry. Production and Operations Management, 10(4), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00085.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrgott, M., & Gandibleux, X. (2000). A survey and annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization. Or Spectrum, 22(4), 425–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002910000046
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, V., De Nito, E., Pezzillo Iacono, M., Canonico, P., & Fattoruso, G. (2019). Knowledge integration in an interorganisational research project: A case study from a backward region. In IFKAD 2019 (pp. 780–792).
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013). An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 20(1–2), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1482
   Google Scholar
• Figueira, J. R., Mousseau, V., & Roy, B. (2016). Electre methods. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, & J. R. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis - state of the art surveys (pp. 155–185). Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7_3
   Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., & Roy, B. (2002). Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galo, N. R., Calache, L. D. D. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2018). A group decision approach for supplier categorization based on hesitant fuzzy and ELECTRE TRI. International Journal of Production Economics, 202, 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gironda, L. (2018). Application of WCM methodologies for first time quality improvement [Doctoral dissertation]. Politecnico di Torino.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, P. F., Bordini, G. A., Loures, E. F., & Santos, E. A. (2018, September). Industry 4.0 through organizational interoperability perspective: A multicriteria decision analysis. In Transdisciplinary Engineering Methods for Social Innovation of Industry 4.0: Proceedings of the 25th ISPE Inc. International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, July 3–6, 2018 (Vol. 7, p. 72). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-898-3-72
   Google Scholar
• Gothwal, S., & Raj, T. (2018). Prioritising the performance measures of FMS using multi-criteria decision making approaches. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 8(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2018.088657
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016). Supplier risk assessment based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and ELECTRE TRI-C: A case illustration involving service suppliers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(2), 339–376. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, S., Figueira, J., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
   Google Scholar
• Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Dominance-based rough set approach to interactive multiobjective optimization. In Multiobjective optimization (pp. 121–155). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_5
   Google Scholar
• Gutjahr, W. J., Katzensteiner, S., Reiter, P., Stummer, C., & Denk, M. (2010). Multi-objective decision analysis for competence-oriented project portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(3), 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafizi, M., Jamaludin, S. N. S., & Shamil, A. H. (2019, June). State of the art review of quality control method in automotive manufacturing industry [Paper presentation]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering) (Vol. 530, p. 012034). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/530/1/012034
   Google Scholar
• Hakanen, J., Miettinen, K., & Matković, K. (2021). Task-based visual analytics for interactive multiobjective optimization. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(9), 2073–2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1768809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., Wang, L., Fetch, S., & Bidanda, B. (2008). A multi-objective model for project portfolio selection to implement lean and Six Sigma concepts. International Journal of Production Research, 46(23), 6611–6625. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802230363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Gordon, M. (2017). MACBETHSort: A multiple criteria decision aid procedure for sorting strategic products. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0002-9
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Pearman, C., & Nemery, P. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4767–4784. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.657966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Pereira, V. (2020). Utilisation of ANPSort for sorting alternative with interdependent criteria illustrated through a researcher’s classification problem in an academic context. Soft Computing, 24(18), 13639–13612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04405-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Martínez, L. (2020). Analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy sorting: An analytic hierarchy process–based method for fuzzy classification in sorting problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(6), 928–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1595188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H., & Meyer, R. F. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U., & Pisinger, D. (2004). Multidimensional knapsack problems. In Knapsack problems (pp. 235–283). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24777-7_9
   Google Scholar
• Klamroth, K., & Miettinen, K. (2008). Integrating approximation and interactive decision making in multicriteria optimization. Operations Research, 56(1), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar Singh, R., & Modgil, S. (2020). Assessment of lean supply chain practices in Indian automotive industry. Global Business Review, 097215091989023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919890234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liesiö, J., Mild, P., & Salo, A. (2008). Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. European Journal of Operational Research, 190(3), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liesiö, J., Salo, A., Keisler, J. M., & Morton, A. (2021). Portfolio decision analysis: Recent developments and future prospects. European Journal of Operational Research, 293(3), 811–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lolli, F., Ishizaka, A., Gamberini, R., Rimini, B., Balugani, E., & Prandini, L. (2017). Requalifying public buildings and utilities using a group decision support system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1081–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, C., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). GAHPSort: A new group multi-criteria decision method for sorting a large number of the cloud-based ERP solutions. Computers in Industry, 92-93, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control system as a package – opportunities challenges and research direction. Management Accounting Research, 19 (4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccoli, F., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). Sorting municipalities in Umbria according to the risk of wolf attacks with AHPSort II. Ecological Indicators, 73, 741–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montmain, J., Labreuche, C., Imoussaten, A., & Trousset, F. (2015). Multi-criteria improvement of complex systems. Information Sciences, 291, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. O., & Daniels, R. L. (2001). Integrating product mix and technology adoption decisions: A portfolio approach for evaluating advanced technologies in the automobile industry. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00058-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanamoorthy, S., Ramya, L., Kalaiselvan, S., Kureethara, J. V., & Kang, D. (2021). Use of DEMATEL and COPRAS method to select best alternative fuel for control of impact of greenhouse gas emissions. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 76, 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemery, P., & Lamboray, C. (2008). FLOWSORT: A flow-based sorting method with limiting or central profiles. TOP, 16(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-007-0036-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepal, B., Lassan, G., Drow, B., & Chelst, K. (2009). A set-covering model for optimizing selection of portfolio of microcontrollers in an automotive supplier company. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(1), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrillo, A., De Felice, F., & Zomparelli, F. (2019). Performance measurement for world-class manufacturing: A model for the Italian automotive industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(7–8), 908–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1408402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruni, A., Giagloglou, E., Douglas, E., Geng, J., Leva, M. C., & Demichela, M. (2019). Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to choose a human factors technique: Choosing the suitable Human Reliability Analysis technique for the automotive industry. Safety Science, 119, 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C. (2001). Extended lexicographic goal programming: A unifying approach. Omega, 29(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00026-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, A., Keisler, J., & Morton, A. (Eds.), (2011). Portfolio decision analysis: Improved methods for resource allocation (Vol. 162). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9943-6
   Google Scholar
• Sarnataro, M., Barbati, M., & Greco, S. (2021). A portfolio approach for the selection and the timing of urban planning projects. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonberger, R. J. (2008). World class manufacturing. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Stoycheva, S., Marchese, D., Paul, C., Padoan, S., Juhmani, A. S., & Linkov, I. (2018). Multi-criteria decision analysis framework for sustainable manufacturing in automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topcu, I., Unver, B., Isik, M., & Kabak, O. (2018). An AHP based prioritization model for risk evaluation factors in the automotive industry. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i1.563
   Google Scholar
• Ülengin, F., Önsel, Ş., Aktas, E., Kabak, Ö., & Özaydın, Ö. (2014). A decision support methodology to enhance the competitiveness of the Turkish automotive industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(3), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unver, B., Kabak, Ö., Topcu, Y. I., Altinisik, A., & Cavusoglu, O. (2020). A decision support system for proactive failure prevention: A case in a leading automotive company. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(5), 845–880. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Kunc, M., & Li, J. (2020). Project portfolio implementation under uncertainty and interdependencies: A simulation study of behavioural responses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(9), 1426–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1609890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., & Zioło, M. (2019). Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega, 86, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, T., Moon, D. H., & Baek, S. G. (2012). A simulation study integrated with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in an automotive manufacturing system. SIMULATION, 88(4), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549711407781
   Google Scholar
• Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (1999). Business failure prediction using the UTADIS multicriteria analysis method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(11), 1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2001). A preference disaggregation decision support system for financial classification problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00044-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00243-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar