A consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on empathetic network analysis and its application in strategical selection of COVID-19 vaccines

References

• Andreadakis, Z., Kumar, A., Román, R. G., Tollefsen, S., Saville, M., & Mayhew, S. (2020). The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 19(5), 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezdekm, J. C. (1976). A physical interpretation of fuzzy ISODATA. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 6, 387–390. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1976.4309506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capuano, N., Chiclana, F., Fujita, H., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Loia, V. (2018). Fuzzy group decision making with incomplete information guided by social influence. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(3), 1704–1718. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2744605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. M., Lee, L. W., Yang, S. W., & Sheu, T. W. (2012). Adaptive consensus support model for group decision making systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(16), 12580–12588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Xu, W. J., Liang, H. M., & Dong, Y. C. (2020). The classification-based consensus in multi-attribute group decision-making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(9), 1375–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1609888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, D., Zhou, Z. L., Cheng, F. X., Zhou, Y. F., & Xie, Y. J. (2018). Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(3), 1122–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J. F., Wang, Y. M., Liu, X. W., & Liu, Y. C. (2020). Social network community analysis based large-scale group decision making approach with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. Information Fusion, 60, 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, R. X., Wang, X. Q., Shang, K., & Herrera, F. (2019). Social network analysis-based conflict relationship investigation and conflict degree-based consensus reaching process for large scale decision making using sparse representation. Information Fusion, 50, 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Q. X., & Cooper, O. (2016). A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. C. (1973). A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well-separated clusters. Journal of Cybernetics, 3(3), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969727308546046
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, T. F. (1985). Clustering to minimize the maximum inter-cluster distance. Theoretical Computer Science, 38, 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(85)90224-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Maknoon, R., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2016). Multiple attribute decision making (MADM) based scenarios. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2015.1132487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalibatas, D., Zavadskas, E. K., & Kalibatienė, D. (2012). A method of multi-attribute assessment using ideal alternative: Choosing an apartment with optimal indoor environment. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 16(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.722567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2008). A model and case for supporting participatory public decision making in e-democracy. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9075-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. L., & Wei, C. P. (2020). A two-stage dynamic influence model-achieving decision-making consensus within large scale groups operating with incomplete information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 189(C), 105132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. F., & Liao, H. C. (2021). A group decision making method to manage internal and external experts with an application to anti-lung cancer drug selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 183, 115379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Q., Liao, X. W., & Liu, J. P. (2017). A social ties-based approach for group decision-making problems with incomplete additive preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 119, 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. S., Guo, S. J., Yan, K. J., Li, L., & Wang, X. (2017). Double weight determination method for experts of complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 28(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.21629/JSEE.2017.01.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. S., Shen, Y. H., Chen, X. H., Chen, Y., & Wang, X. Q. (2014). A partial binary tree DEA-DA cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems. Information Fusion, 18, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. S., Zhou, Q., Ding, R. X., Palomares, I., & Herrera, F. (2019). Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: Trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(2), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Xu, Y. J., & Herrera, F. (2019). Consensus model for large-scale group d: Ecision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: Detecting and managing overconfidence behaviors. Information Fusion, 52, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, F. Y., An, Q. X., & Chen, X. H. (2016). A consistency and consensus-based method to group decision making with interval linguistic preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(11), 1419–1437. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2016.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam, B., Nigam, A., Jain, R., Dodia, S., Arora, N., & Annappa, B. (2021). COVID-19: Automatic detection from X-ray images by utilizing deep learning methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 176, 114883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, N. R., & Bezdek, J. C. (1995). On cluster validity for the fuzzy c-mean model. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 3(3), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.413225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomares, I., Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2014). A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(3), 516–530. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2262769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, S. C., Zhou, Y. M., Cao, L. H., Yu, S., Niu, J. W., & Jia, W. J. (2018). Influence analysis in social networks: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 106, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, R. M., Labella, Á., Tré, G. D., & Martínez, L. (2018). A large scale consensus reaching process managing group hesitation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 159, 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi-Abari, A., Boutilier, C., & Larson, K. (2019). Empathetic decision making in social networks. Artificial Intelligence, 275, 174–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena, A., Prasad, M., Gupta, A., Bharill, N., Patel, O. P., Tiwari, A., Joo, E. M., Ding, W. P., & Lin, C. T. (2017). A review of clustering techniques and developments. Neurocomputing, 267, 664–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shereen, M. A., Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., & Siddique, R. (2020). COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruse. Journal of Advanced Research, 24, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Li, G., Ergu, D., & Liu, N. (2022). An optimisation-based method to conduct consistency and consensus in group decision making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(4), 840–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1873079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switalski, Z. (1999). Rationality of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107, 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00313-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Liao, H. C., Mi, X. M., Xu, X. H., & Herrera, F. (2021). Dynamic subgroup-quality-based consensus in managing consistency, nearness, and evenness quality indices for large-scale group decision making under hesitant environment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(4), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1708823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Liao, H. C., Xu, J. P., Streimikiene, D., & Zheng, X. S. (2020). Adaptive consensus reaching process with hybrid strategies for large-scale group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 282(3), 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, H. Y. (2020). [2019-nCoV: New challenges from coronavirus]. Zhonghua yu Fang yi Xue za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine], 54(3), 235–238. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2020.03.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tian, J. F., Zhang, Z. M., & Ha, M. H. (2019). An additive-consistency- and consensus-based approach for uncertain group decision making with linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(5), 873–887. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2865132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torale, J., O’Higgins, M., Castaldelli-Maia, J. M., & Ventriglio, A. (2020). The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(4), 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020915212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ureña, R., Chiclana, F., Melançon, G., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2019). A social network based approach for consensus achievement in multiperson decision making. Information Fusion, 47, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., Xu, X. H., Huang, S., & Cai, C. G. (2018). A linguistic large group decision making method based on the cloud model. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3314–3326. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2822242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T., Liu, X. W., & Liu, F. (2018). An interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS model for large scale group decision making problems with social network information. Information Sciences, 432, 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. B., & Xu, J. P. (2016). Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Omega, 65(3), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. B., & Xu, J. P. (2018). A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Information Fusion, 41, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X. H., Du, Z. J., & Chen, X. H. (2015). Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions. Decision Support Systems, 79, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X. H., Du, Z. J., Chen, X. H., & Cai, C. G. (2019). Confidence consensus-based model for large-scale group decision making: A novel approach to managing non-cooperative behaviors. Information Sciences, 477, 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.10.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. (1998). Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199601)11:1<49::AID-INT3>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z. L. (2013). An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1-2), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. J., Palomares, I., Dong, Y. C., & Wang, W. W. (2018). Managing non-cooperative behaviors in consensus-based multiple attribute group decision making: An approach based on social network analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 162, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, K. L., Fu, C., & Yang, S. L. (2014). Fuzziness parameter selection in fuzzy c-means: The perspective of cluster validation. Science China Information Sciences, 57(11), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-014-5146-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar