New additive-consistency-driven methods for deriving two types of normalized utility vectors from additive reciprocal preference relations

References

• Aguaron, J., & Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. (2003). The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds. European Journal of Operational Research, 147, 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Salem, A. A., & Awasthi, A. (2018). Investigating rank reversal in reciprocal fuzzy preference relation based on additive consistency: Causes and solutions. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 115, 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, P., Ishizaka, A., Lucadamo, A., Marcarelli, G., & Vyas, V. (2020). Computing a common preference vector in a complex multi-actor and multi-group decision system in Analytic Hierarchy Process context. Annals of Operations Research, 284(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03258-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli, M. (2015). Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brunelli, M., & Fedrizzi, M. (2015). Axiomatic properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B., & D’Apuzzo, L. (2012). Deriving weights from a pairwise comparison matrix over an alo-group. Soft Computing, 6, 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B., Ishizaka, A., Olivieri, M. G., & Squillante, M. (2019). Comparing inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrices depending on entries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1464427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2001). Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 122(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00004-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duleba, S. (2022). Introduction and comparative analysis of the multi-level parsimonious AHP methodology in a public transport development decision problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1824553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedrizzi, M., & Brunelli, M. (2010). On the priority vector associated with a reciprocal relation and a pairwise comparison matrix. Soft Computing, 14(6), 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0432-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedrizzi, M., Brunelli, M., & Caprila, A. (2020). The linear algebra of pairwise comparisons. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 118, 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, W., Gong, Z., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Li, Q. (2021). Priority weights acquisition of linear uncertain preference relations and its application in the ranking of online shopping platforms. Applied Soft Computing, 105, 107292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., Tan, X., & Yang, Y. (2019). Optimal weighting models based on linear uncertain constraints in intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(8), 1296–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1489349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2007). A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(5), 863–877. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.889952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Siraj, S. (2018). Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorshidi, H. A., & Aickelin, U. (2021). Multicriteria group decision-making under uncertainty using interval data and cloud models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(11), 2542–2556. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1796541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K., Mazurek, J., & Strada, M. (2021). On the similarity between ranking vectors in the pairwise comparison method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2021, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1947754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, T. (2020). Interval multiplicative pairwise comparison matrix: Consistency, indeterminacy and normality. Information Sciences, 517, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.12.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. W. (2012). Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(14), 11666–11676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., Xu, Y., Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2019). An overview on managing additive consistency of reciprocal preference relations for consistency-driven decision making and fusion: Taxonomy and future directions. Information Fusion, 52, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., & Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega, 94, 102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Zhang, J. W., Yu, Q., Peng, Y. N., & Pedrycz, W. (2020). On weak consistency of interval additive reciprocal matrices. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 19(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09314-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, F., & Chen, X. (2015). A new method for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 73, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, F., & Chen, X. (2018). A robust additive consistency-based method for decision making with triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 17(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-016-9262-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi, X., Liao, H., & Zeng, X. J. (2021). Transitivity and approximate consistency threshold determination for reciprocal preference relations in group decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2021, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1928560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramík, J. (2021). Deriving priority vector from pairwise comparisons matrix with fuzzy elements. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 422, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2020.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Liao, H., Mi, X., Xu, X., & Herrera, F. (2021). Dynamic subgroup-quality-based consensus in managing consistency, nearness, and evenness quality indices for large-scale group decision making under hesitant environment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(4), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1708823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanino, T. (1984). Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J. (2021). A novel triangular fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(7), 2032–2046. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2992103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J., Liu, F. Q., Qin, S. T., & Jin, X. T. (2021). New additive consistency framework and utility derivation for interval fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2021, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.2004947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J., & Wu, Y. K. (2021). Minimum adjustment cost-based multi-stage goal programming models for consistency improving and consensus building with multiplicative reciprocal paired comparison matrices. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2021, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1935336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J., Yang, X., & Jin, X. T. (2020). And-like-uninorm-based transitivity and analytic hierarchy process with interval-valued fuzzy preference relations. Information Sciences, 539, 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., & Xu, J. (2012). A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 206, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, M., & Chen, J. (2015). Consistency and consensus improving methods for pairwise comparison matrices based on Abelian linearly ordered group. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 266, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Da, Q., & Liu, L. (2009). Normalizing rank aggregation method for priority of a fuzzy preference relation and its effectiveness. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50(8), 1287–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Da, Q., & Wang, H. (2011). A note on group decision-making procedure based on incomplete reciprocal relations. Soft Computing, 15(7), 1289–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-010-0662-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Herrera, F., & Wang, H. (2016). A distance-based framework to deal with ordinal and additive inconsistencies for fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Information Sciences, 328, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.08.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, H. (2018). The additive consistency measure of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 9(7), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0637-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Xi, Y., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2019). An alternative consensus model of additive preference relations for group decision making based on the ordinal consistency. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21(6), 1818–1830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00696-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. (2004). Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 36(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2003.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. (2007). A survey of fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of General Systems, 36(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070600913726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Kou, X., Yu, W., & Gao, Y. (2021). Consistency improvement for fuzzy preference relations with self-confidence: An application in two-sided matching decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(8), 1914–1927. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1748529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, B., & Xu, Z. (2014). A fuzzy linear programming method for group decision making with additive reciprocal fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 246, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar