239
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Uncertainty measures of complex preference relations for decision making

Pages 1628-1639 | Received 12 Mar 2022, Accepted 08 Jul 2022, Published online: 27 Jul 2022

References

  • Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2001). Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 122(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00004-X
  • Dede, G., Kamalakis, T., & Sphicopoulos, T. (2015). Convergence properties and practical estimation of the probability of rank reversal in pairwise comparisons for multi-criteria decision making problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(2), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.037
  • Dede, G., Kamalakis, T., & Sphicopoulos, T. (2016). Theoretical estimation of the probability of weight rank reversal in pairwise comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(2), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.059
  • Dubois, D., Fargier, H., & Perny, P. (2003). Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: An axiomatic approach. Artificial Intelligence, 148(1-2), 219–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00037-7
  • Durbach, I., Lahdelma, R., & Salminen, P. (2014). The analytic hierarchy process with stochastic judgements. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(2), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.045
  • Fargier, H., & Sabbadin, R. (2005). Qualitative decision under uncertainty: Back to expected utility. Artificial Intelligence, 164(1-2), 245–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2004.12.002
  • Fu, C., Chang, W., Liu, W., & Yang, S. (2022). Consistency of distributed preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(4), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1865849
  • Li, K. W., Wang, Z.-J., & Tong, X. (2016). Acceptability analysis and priority weight elicitation for interval multiplicative comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.010
  • Liu, J., Huang, C., Song, J., Du, P., Jin, F., & Chen, H. (2021). Group decision making based on the modified probability calculation method and dea cross-efficiency with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 156, 107262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107262
  • Liu, H. F., Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2016). The multiplicative consistency index of hesitant fuzzy preference relation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 24(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2426315
  • Rosenbloom, E. S. (1997). A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 96(2), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00049-5
  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  • Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 32(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90275-X
  • Shen, S., Chen, X., & Wu, Z. (2021). Optimal improvement of the best and worst consistency levels for interval additive preference relations. Information Sciences, 553, 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.040
  • Song, Y., Li, G., Ergu, D., & Liu, N. (2022). An optimisation-based method to conduct consistency and consensus in group decision making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(4), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1873079
  • Stam, A., & Silva, A. P. D. (1997). Stochastic judgments in the AHP: The measurement of rank reversal probabilities. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 655–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01326.x
  • Tanino, T. (1988). Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. In Non-conventional preference relations in decision making (pp. 54–71) Springer.
  • Wang, H., Liao, H. C., Huang, B., & Xu, Z. S. (2021). Determining consensus thresholds for group decision making with preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(10), 2230–2290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1779626
  • Wang, Z.-J., Liu, F.-Q., Qin, S.-T., & Jin, X.-T. (2021). New additive consistency framework and utility derivation for interval fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.2004947
  • Wang, H., Yu, D. J., & Xu, Z. S. (2021). A novel process to determine consensus thresholds and its application in probabilistic linguistic group decision-making. Expert Systems with Applications, 168(2), 114315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114315
  • Xu, Z. S. (2004a). A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 166(1-4), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2003.10.006
  • Xu, Z. S. (2004b). On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODM.0000036864.33950.1b
  • Xu, Z. S. (2005). Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega, 33(3), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.04.008
  • Xu, Y., Dai, W., Huang, J., Li, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Some models to manage additive consistency and derive priority weights from hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Information Sciences, 586, 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.002
  • Xue, M., Fu, C., & Yang, S. (2022). A comparative analysis of probabilistic linguistic preference relations and distributed preference relations for decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 21(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09357-w
  • Xu, Y., Patnayakuni, R., & Wang, H. (2013). The ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relation. Information Sciences, 224, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.035
  • Xu, Z. S., & Wang, H. (2017). On the syntax and semantics of virtual linguistic terms for information fusion in decision making. Information Fusion, 34, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.06.002
  • Yager, R. R. (1981). A new methodology for ordinal multiobjective decisions based on fuzzy sets. Decision Sciences, 12(4), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1981.tb00111.x
  • Zadeh, L. (1996). Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 4(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.493904
  • Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, H., & Liao, H. (2016). Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Applied Soft Computing, 49, 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.045
  • Zhou, W., & Xu, Z. S. (2017). Group consistency and group decision making under uncertain probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference environment. Information Sciences, 414, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.06.004
  • Zhu, B., & Xu, Z. S. (2014). Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2245136
  • Zhu, B., Xu, Z. S., Zhang, R., & Hong, M. (2015). Generalized analytic network process. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(1), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.011

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.