A calibrated Fuzzy Best-Worst-method to reinforce supply chain resilience during the COVID 19 pandemic

References

• Absalon, J. A. T., Blasabas, D. K. C., Capinpin, E. M. A., Daclan, M. D., Yamagishi, K. D., & Ocampo, L. A. (2022). Impact assessment of farm tourism sites using a hybrid MADM-based composite sustainability index. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(13), 2063–2085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adobor, H., & McMullen, R. S. (2018). Supply chain resilience: A dynamic and multidimensional approach. International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(4), 1451–1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrasiabi, A., Chalmardi, M. K., & Balezentis, T. (2022). A novel hybrid evaluation framework for public organizations based on employees’ performance factors. Evaluation and Program Planning, 91, 102020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, V., Mathiyazhagan, K., Malhotra, S., & Saikouk, T. (2022). Analysis of challenges in sustainable human resource management due to disruptions by Industry 4.0: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Manpower, 43(2), 513–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N., & Hasan, M. G. (2021). Self-adaptive query-broadcast in wireless ad-hoc networks using fuzzy best worst method. Wireless Networks, 27(1), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02477-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aigbogun, O., Ghazali, Z., & Razali, R. (2014). A framework to enhance supply chain resilience: The Case of Malaysian pharmaceutical industry. Global Business & Management Research, 6(3), 219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Alamroshan, F., La’li, M., & Yahyaei, M. (2022). The green-agile supplier selection problem for the medical devices: A hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(5), 6793–6811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, B., Tavana, M., & Mina, H. (2021). A dynamic decision support system for sustainable supplier selection in circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 905–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., Kumar Paul, S., Chowdhury, P., Agarwal, R., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C., & Luthra, S. (2021). Modelling of supply chain disruption analytics using an integrated approach: An emerging economy example. Expert Systems with Applications, 173(February), 114690.
   Google Scholar
• Alikhani, R., Torabi, S. A., & Altay, N. (2021). Retail supply chain network design with concurrent resilience capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 234(January), 108042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Ghahremanloo, M., Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Banaitis, A. (2021). A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1793424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Ghahremanloo, M., Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2020). A new fuzzy approach based on BWM and fuzzy preference programming for hospital performance evaluation: A case study. Applied Soft Computing, 92, 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami, S., & Rastegar, M. (2022). Security-based critical power distribution feeder identification: Application of fuzzy BWM-VIKOR and SECA. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 134, 107395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Gunasekaran, A., Ndubisi, N. O., & Venkatesh, M. (2021). Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163(2020), 120447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Marcucci, G., & Mazzuto, G. (2020). Fuzzy cognitive maps approach for analysing the domino effect of factors affecting supply chain resilience: A fashion industry case study. International Journal of Production Research, 58(20), 6370–6398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1680893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessley, M., & Mudambi, S. M. (2022). A trade way and a pandemic: Disruption and resilience in the food bank supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalraborty, S., & Biswas, M. C. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the textile, apparel and fashion manufacturing industry supply chain: Case study on a ready-made garment manufacturing industry. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Procurement, 3(2), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., & Vrontis, D. (2022). Examining the impact of adoption of emerging technology and supply chain resilience on firm performance: Moderating role of absorptive capacity and leadership support. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3134188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheraghi, M., Eslami Baladeh, A., & Khakzad, N. (2022). Optimal selection of safety recommendations: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to HAZOP. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 74(2021), 104654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(46109), 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2014). Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, P., Kumar Paul, S., Kaisar, S., & Abdul Moktadir, M. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMarco, A. (2020). McKinsey issues dismal post-pandemic forecast for $2.5 trillion fashion industry. Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, J., Wan, S., & Chen, S. M. (2021). Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making. Information Sciences, 547, 1080–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekanayake, E. M. A. C., Shen, G. Q. P., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2021a). Identifying supply chain capabilities of construction firms in industrialized construction. Production Planning & Control, 32(4), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1732494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekanayake, E. M. A. C., Shen, G. Q. P., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Shen, G. Q. P., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2021b). The Management of Operations A fuzzy synthetic evaluation of capabilities for improving supply chain resilience of industrialised construction : A Hong Kong case study A fuzzy synthetic evaluation of capabilities for improving supply chain resilience. Production Planning & Control, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahpour, A., Nayeri, S., Sheikhalishahi, M., Wong, K. Y., Tian, G., & Fathollahi-Fard, A. M. (2021a). A hyper-hybrid fuzzy decision-making framework for the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem: A case study of Malaysian Palm oil industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12491-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahpour, A., Wong, K. Y., Rajoo, S., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Antucheviciene, J., & Nayeri, S. (2021b). An integrated approach for a sustainable supplier selection based on Industry 4.0 concept. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17445-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friday, D., Savage, D. A., Melnyk, S. A., Harrison, N., Ryan, S., & Wechtler, H. (2021). A collaborative approach to maintaining optimal inventory and mitigating stockout risks during a pandemic: Capabilities for enabling health-care supply chain resilience. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 248–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-07-2020-0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, J., Zhong, S., Liu, S., & Yang, D. (2019). Resilient supplier selection based on Fuzzy BWM and GMo-RTOPSIS under supply chain environment. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2019, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2456260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoushchi, S. J., Yousefi, S., & Khazaeili, M. (2019). An extended FMEA approach based on the Z-MOORA and fuzzy BWM for prioritization of failures. Applied Soft Computing, 81, 105505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., & Ljubojević, S. (2017). Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: A case study of Vojvodina, Serbia. Renewable Energy, 103, 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.11.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Torres, T., Rodríguéz-Sánchez, J. L., & Pelechano-Barahona, E. (2021). Managing relationships in the tourism supply chain to overcome epidemic outbreaks: The case of COVID-19 and the hospitality industry in Spain. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92(2020), 102733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. R. (Eds.). (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis (Vol. 233). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gul, M., & Ak, M. F. (2020). Assessment of occupational risks from human health and environmental perspectives: A new integrated approach and its application using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MAIRCA. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34(8), 1231–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01816-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M., Mete, S., Serin, F., & Celik, E. (2021). Fine–Kinney-based occupational risk assessment using fuzzy best and worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy MAIRCA. In Computing, Fine–Kinney-based fuzzy multi-criteria occupational risk assessment. Studies in fuzziness and soft (pp. 13–30). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gul, M., Yucesan, M., & Celik, E. (2020). A manufacturing failure mode and effect analysis based on fuzzy and probabilistic risk analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 96, 106689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Qi, Z. (2021). A fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria group decision-making method. IEEE Access. 9, 118941–118952. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3106296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezalkotob, A., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2017). A novel approach for combination of individual and group decisions based on fuzzy best-worst method. Applied Soft Computing, 59, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y., Chong, W. K., & Li, D. (2020). A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance metrics of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 58(15), 4541–4566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1785034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenstein, N. O., Feise, E., Hartmann, E., & Giunipero, L. (2015). Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: A systematic review and paths for further investigation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 90–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoseini, S. A., Fallahpour, A., Wong, K. Y., Mahdiyar, A., Saberi, M., & Durdyev, S. (2021a). Sustainable supplier selection in construction industry through hybrid fuzzy-based approaches. Sustainability, 13(3), 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoseini, S. A., Zolfani, S. H., Skačkauskas, P., Fallahpour, A., & Saberi, S. (2021b). A combined interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM framework for the resilient supplier selection problem. Mathematics, 10(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Blackhurst, J. (2020). Conceptualization and measurement of supply chain resilience in an open-system context. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, L., Zhang, H., Peng, Y., Wang, S., Yao, S., Li, Z., & Deng, G. (2021). An integrated multi-objective optimization method with application to train crashworthiness design. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 63(3), 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02758-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., Zhang, L., Ma, L., Bai, W., & Ren, J. (2021). Multi-criteria decision analysis of China’s energy security from 2008 to 2017 based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index. Energy, 228, 120481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, A., Chun, J., & Khan, M. (2020). A novel framework towards viable Cloud Service Selection as a Service (CSSaaS) under a fuzzy environment. Future Generation Computer Systems, 104, 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.09.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, A., Chun, J., & Khan, M. (2021). A novel multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach for precise decision making under a fuzzy environment. Soft Computing, 25(7), 5645–5661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05561-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibn-Mohammed, T., Mustapha, K. B., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z., Babatunde, K. A., Akintade, D. D., Acquaye, A., Fujii, H., Ndiaye, M. M., Yamoah, F. A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2021). A critical review of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164(September), 105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irannezhad, M., Shokouhyar, S., Ahmadi, S., & Papageorgiou, E. I. (2021). An integrated FCM-FBWM approach to assess and manage the readiness for blockchain incorporation in the supply chain. Applied Soft Computing, 112, 107832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A. (2014). Comparison of fuzzy logic, AHP, FAHP and hybrid fuzzy AHP for new supplier selection and its performance analysis. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 9(1/2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2014.064353
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Nguyen, N. H. (2013). Calibrated fuzzy AHP for current bank account selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3775–3783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D. (2020a). Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136(March), 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D. (2020b). Viable supply chain model: Integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D. (2021). Digital supply chain management and technology to enhance resilience by building and using end-to-end visibility during the COVID-19 pandemic. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). New disruption risk management perspectives in supply chains: Digital twins, the ripple effect, and resileanness. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.138
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158–6174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1330572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kähkönen, A. K., Evangelista, P., Hallikas, J., Immonen, M., & Lintukangas, K. (2021). COVID-19 as a trigger for dynamic capability development and supply chain resilience improvement. International Journal of Production Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.2009588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, D., Mina, H., Nosrati-Abarghooee, S., & Khosrojerdi, G. (2020). Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach. The Science of the Total Environment, 722, 137936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, H., Sadeghi-Dastaki, M., & Javan, M. (2020). A fully fuzzy best–worst multi attribute decision making method with triangular fuzzy number: A case study of maintenance assessment in the hospitals. Applied Soft Computing, 86, 105882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., & Ghahremanloo, M. (2021). Sustainable public transportation evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on fuzzy BWM and MABAC. The Open Transportation Journal, 15(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802115010031
   Google Scholar
• Khalili Nasr, A., Tavana, M., Alavi, B., & Mina, H. (2021). A novel fuzzy multi-objective circular supplier selection and order allocation model for sustainable closed-loop supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 124994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. A. R., & Ponce, P. (2022). Investigating the effects of the outbreak of COVID-19 on perishable food supply chains: An empirical study using PLS-SEM. International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(3), 773–795.
   Google Scholar
• Khanmohammadi, E., Zandieh, M., & Tayebi, T. (2019). Drawing a strategy canvas using the fuzzy best–worst method. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0202-z
   Google Scholar
• Kheybari, S., Ishizaka, A., & Salamirad, A. (2021). A new hybrid risk-averse best-worst method and portfolio optimization to select temporary hospital locations for Covid-19 patients. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolagar, M., Hosseini, S. M. H., Felegari, R., & Fattahi, P. (2020). Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: A hybrid DEA-FBWM approach. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40(4), 485–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09747-x
   Google Scholar
• Krstić, M. D., Tadić, S. R., Brnjac, N., & Zečević, S. (2019). Intermodal terminal handling equipment selection using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model. PROMET – Traffic & Transportation, 31(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v31i1.2949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Mangla, S.-K., Kumar, P., & Song, M. (2021). Mitigate risks in perishable food supply chains: Learning from COVID-19. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166(January), 120643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Mangla, S.-K., Luthra, S., & Ishizaka, A. (2019). Evaluating the human resource related soft dimensions in green supply chain management implementation. Production Planning & Control, 30(9), 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1555342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., & Ramesh, A. (2020). An MCDM framework for assessment of social sustainability indicators of the freight transport industry under uncertainty. A multi-company perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(5), 1023–1058. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Saurav, S., & Mahapatra, D. S. S. (2017). Evaluation of performance index in resilient supply chain: A fuzzy-based approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(1), 118–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, G., Goyal, K. K., Batra, N. K., & Rani, D. (2022). Single part reconfigurable flow line design using fuzzy best worst method. Opsearch, 59(2), 603–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-021-00550-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. P., Xie, L., Cheng, P. F., Zhou, X. H., & Fu, C. X. (2021). Green supplier selection under cloud manufacturing environment: A hybrid MCDM model. SAGE Open, 11(4), 215824402110571. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211057112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. M., Chan, F. T. S., Tsang, Y. P., & Lam, H. Y. (2021). New product idea selection in the fuzzy front end of innovation: A fuzzy best-worst method and group decision-making process. Mathematics, 9(4), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Li, B., Fang, R., You, P., Zou, Y., Xu, Z., & Guo, S. (2021). Risk evaluation of electric power grid enterprise related to electricity transmission and distribution tariff regulation employing a hybrid MCDM model. Mathematics, 9(9), 989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, X., Chen, T., Ye, M., Lin, H., & Li, Z. (2021). A hybrid fuzzy BWM-VIKOR MCDM to evaluate the service level of bike-sharing companies: A case study from Chengdu, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, R., Liu, Y., Ren, J., Lee, C. K. M., Ji, P., Zhang, L., & Man, Y. (2022). An innovative sustainability-oriented multi-criteria decision making framework for prioritization of industrial systems with interdependent factors: Method and a case study of electricity generation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., Ayed, H., Bouallegue, B., Tomaskova, H., Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S., & Haseli, G. (2021). An integrated mathematical attitude utilizing fully fuzzy BWM and fuzzy WASPAS for risk evaluation in a SOFC. Mathematics, 9(18), 2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, J. J. H., Chang, M. H., Lo, H. W., & Hsu, M. H. (2021). Application of an MCDM model with data mining techniques for green supplier evaluation and selection. Applied Soft Computing, 109, 107534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Hendalianpour, A., Fakhrabadi, M., & Feylizadeh, M. (2022). Integrating IVFRN-BWM and goal programming to allocate the order quantity considering discount for green supplier. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(2), 989–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01181-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Lin, R., & Ren, J. (2021). Developing a life cycle composite footprint index for sustainability prioritization of sludge-to-energy alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Ren, J., Man, Y., Lin, R., Lee, C. K. M., & Ji, P. (2020). Prioritization of sludge-to-energy technologies under multi-data condition based on multi-criteria decision-making analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, C., & Ishizaka, A. (2019). A hybrid FCM-AHP approach to predict impacts of offshore outsourcing location decisions on supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Research, 103(June), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, L., & Shuai, K. (2022). Surrogate-assisted optimization of a five-phase SPM machine with quasi-trapezoidal PMs. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 69(1), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2020.3048279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdiyar, A., Mohandes, S. R., Durdyev, S., Tabatabaee, S., & Ismail, S. (2020). Barriers to green roof installation: An integrated fuzzy-based MCDM approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud, P., Paul, S. K., Azeem, A., & Chowdhury, P. (2021). Evaluating supply chain collaboration barriers in small and medium-sized enterprises. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(13), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, A., Shaw, M., & Sinha, S. K. (2020). COVID-19 debunks the myth of socially sustainable supply chain: A case of the clothing industry in South Asian countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malakoutikhah, M., Alimohammadlou, M., Jahangiri, M., Rabiei, H., Faghihi, S. A., & Kamalinia, M. (2022). Modeling the factors affecting unsafe behaviors using the fuzzy best–worst method and fuzzy cognitive map. Applied Soft Computing, 114, 108119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghsoodi, A. I., Mosavat, M., Hafezalkotob, A., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2019). Hybrid hierarchical fuzzy group decision-making based on information axioms and BWM: Prototype design selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127(March), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.018
   Google Scholar
• Mathiyazhagan, K., Agarwal, V., Appolloni, A., Saikouk, T., & Gnanavelbabu, A. (2021). Integrating lean and agile practices for achieving global sustainability goals in Indian manufacturing industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171(May), 120982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, M., Nettleton, C., Tom, C., Xu, B., Cao, C., & Qiao, P. (2020). Risk management: Rethinking fashion supply chain management for multinational corporations in light of the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(8), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13080173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, M., & Chen, Z. (2021). Evaluation and selection of sustainable hydrogen production technology with hybrid uncertain sustainability indicators based on rough-fuzzy BWM-DEA. Renewable Energy. 165, 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi, X., Tang, M., Liao, H., Shen, W., & Lev, B. (2019). The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what’s next? Omega (UK), 87, 205–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, R., Singh, R. K., & Subramanian, N. (2022). Impact of disruptions in agri-food supply chain due to COVID-19 pandemic: Contextualised resilience framework to achieve operational excellence. International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(3), 926–954.p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modgil, S., Singh, R. K., & Hannibal, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence for supply chain resilience: Learning from Covid-19. International Journal of Logistics Management.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A., Jabbour, A. B. L., de, S., & Diabat, A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic disruption: A matter of building companies’ internal and external resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moharrami, M., Naboureh, A., Nachappa, T. G., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Guan, X., & Blaschke, T. (2020). National-scale landslide susceptibility mapping in Austria using fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(6), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9060393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohtashami, A. (2021). A novel modified fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Expert Systems with Applications, 181(December), 115196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moslem, S., Gul, M., Farooq, D., Celik, E., Ghorbanzadeh, O., & Blaschke, T. (2020). An integrated approach of best-worst method (BWM) and triangular fuzzy sets for evaluating driver behavior factors related to road safety. Mathematics, 8(3), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8030414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafaeipour, A., Alvandimanesh, M., Najafi, F., & Issakhov, A. (2021). Identifying challenges and barriers for development of solar energy by using fuzzy best-worst method: A case study. Energy, 226, 120355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos, K., Tsinopoulos, C., & Vasilakis, C. (2021). Operational research in the time of COVID-19: The ‘science for better’ or worse in the absence of hard data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Barrios, M., Silvera-Natera, E., Petrillo, A., Gul, M., & Yucesan, M. (2022). A multicriteria approach to integrating occupational safety & health performance and industry systems productivity in the context of aging workforce: A case study. Safety Science, 152(November), 105764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamucar, D., Iordache, M., Deveci, M., Schitea, D., & Iordache, I. (2021). A new hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision methodology model for prioritizing the alternatives of the hydrogen bus development: A case study from Romania. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(57), 29616–29637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, A., Shardeo, V., Dwivedi, A., & Madaan, J. (2021a). An integrated approach to model the blockchain implementation barriers in humanitarian supply chain. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 14(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-07-2020-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, A., Shardeo, V., Dwivedi, A., Madaan, J., & Varma, N. (2021b). Barriers to sustainability in humanitarian medical supply chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1794–1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, T. J. (2008). Supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework, an assessment tool and an implementation process. The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., & Fiksel, J. (2013). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development and implementation of an assessment tool. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(1), 46–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., & Fiksel, J. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: A retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimenta, M. L., Cezarino, L. O., Piato, E. L., da Silva, C. H. P., Oliveira, B. G., & Liboni, L. B. (2022). Supply chain resilience in a Covid-19 scenario: Mapping capabilities in a systemic framework. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomarov, S. Y. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of supply chain resilience: A dynamic capabilities perspective [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz, M. M., Fosso Wamba, S., & Branski, R. M. (2021). Supply chain resilience during the COVID-19: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Benchmarking: An international Journal, 26(9), 1999–2018.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, S., Hafezalkotob, A., Monavari, S. M., Hafezalkotob, A., & Rahimi, R. (2020). Sustainable landfill site selection for municipal solid waste based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Fuzzy group BWM-MULTIMOORA-GIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj, A., & Srivastava, S. K. (2018). Sustainability performance assessment of an aircraft manufacturing firm. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(5), 1500–1527. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2017-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajesh, R. (2016). Forecasting supply chain resilience performance using grey prediction. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 20, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranney, M. L., Griffeth, V., & Jha, A. K. (2020). Critical supply shortages—The need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(18), e41–3. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2006141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, J. (2020). Fuzzy best-worst method and interpretive structural modelling for complex system analysis: Enablers analysis for aviation maintenance safety. In Advanced operations management for complex systems analysis (pp. 57–78). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, X., Dong, L., & Ren, J. (2021). Multi-criteria decision analysis methods for sustainability assessment and improvement of energy systems under uncertainties. Green Energy and Technology, 2, 161–193.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, X., Li, W., Ding, S., & Dong, L. (2020). Sustainability assessment and decision making of hydrogen production technologies: A novel two-stage multi-criteria decision making method. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(59), 34371–34384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega (UK), 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega (UK), 64, 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2020). A concentration ratio for nonlinear best worst method. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 19(03), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020500170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, P. K., & Shaw, K. (2022). Developing a multi-criteria sustainable credit score system using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(4), 5368–5399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01662-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruel, S., & El Baz, J. (2021). Disaster readiness’ influence on the impact of supply chain resilience and robustness on firms’ financial performance: A COVID-19 empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1962559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruel, S., El Baz, J., Ivanov, D., & Das, A. (2021). Supply chain viability: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validation. Annals of Operations Research, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03974-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation (Decision making series). McGraw-Hill International Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Salarnezhad, A. A., & Shoar, M. (2020). Identification and prioritization of factors contributing in cloud service selection using fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM). Journal of Information Technology Management, 12(4), 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Sarabi, E. P., & Darestani, S. A. (2021). Developing a decision support system for logistics service provider selection employing fuzzy MULTIMOORA & BWM in mining equipment manufacturing. Applied Soft Computing, 98, 106849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleper, M. C., Gold, S., Trautrims, A., & Baldock, D. (2021). Pandemic-induced knowledge gaps in operations and supply chain management: COVID-19’s impacts on retailing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2020-0837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selerio, E. F., Arcadio, R. D., Medio, G. J., Nacua, M. A., & Pedregosa, G. A. (2020). An application of a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach in managing equipment hazards in woodworking. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 10(4), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.100411
   Google Scholar
• Sen, M. K., Dutta, S., & Kabir, G. (2021). Development of flood resilience framework for housing infrastructure system: Integration of best-worst method with evidence theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakeri, H., Khalilzadeh, M., Raslanas, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2021). What do project managers need to know to succeed in face-to-face communication? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 1094–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1819851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, Q., Weng, S. S., Liou, J. J. H., Lo, H. W., & Jiang, H. (2019). Developing a sustainable urban-environmental quality evaluation system in China based on a hybrid model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. B., Jr. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41–48. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=18837361&site=ehost-live
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, B., Li, Q., Dong, C., & Quan, V. (2016). Design outsourcing in the fashion supply chain: OEM versus ODM. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, C. S., Soni, G., & Badhotiya, G. K. (2019). Performance indicators for supply chain resilience: Review and conceptual framework. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(s1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-019-00322-2
   Google Scholar
• Song, K., Zeng, X., Zhang, Y., De Jonckheere, J., Yuan, X., & Koehl, L. (2021). An interpretable knowledge-based decision support system and its applications in pregnancy diagnosis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 221, 106835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni, U., & Jain, V. (2011). Minimizing the vulnerabilities of supply chain: A new framework for enhancing the resilience. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 933–939.
   Google Scholar
• Soni, U., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). Measuring supply chain resilience using a deterministic modeling approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 74(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana, M., Mousavi, S. M. H., Mina, H., & Salehian, F. (2020). A dynamic decision support system for evaluating peer-to-peer rental accommodations in the sharing economy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91(August), 102653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Z. P., Wang, J. Q., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. Y. (2018). A multi-phase QFD-based hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for performance evaluation: A case of smart bike-sharing programs in Changsha. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1068–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, Y., Chen, K., Wang, H., & Li, Z. (2020). Regional water resources security evaluation based on a hybrid fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4987–4924. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valipour, M., Yousefi, S., Jahangoshai Rezaee, M., & Saberi, M. (2022). A clustering-based approach for prioritizing health, safety and environment risks integrating fuzzy C-means and hybrid decision-making methods. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36, 919-938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanany, I., Ali, M. H., Tan, K. H., Kumar, A., & Siswanto, N. (2021). A supply chain resilience capability framework and process for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic disruption. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3116068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. N., Nhieu, N. L., Nguyen, H. P., & Wang, J. W. (2021). Simulation-based optimization integrated multiple criteria decision-making framework for wave energy site selection: A case study of Australia. IEEE Access, 9, 167458–167476. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3134656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Yan, F., Jia, F., & Chen, L. (2021). Building supply chain resilience through ambidexterity: An information processing perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, M. J. E., Yamada, A. P. L., Domingos, E. G. N., Leite, L. R., & Pereira, C. R. (2021). Exploring organizational resilience through key performance indicators. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 38(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2020.1839582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, L., Zhong, S., Liu, S., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2020). An approach for resilient-green supplier selection based on WASPAS, BWM, and TOPSIS under intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1761893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D. (2020). Sustainability prioritization of energy systems by developing an integrated decision support framework with hybrid-data consideration. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 39(April), 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Chan, C. Y. P., Chin, K. S., & Li, Y. l. (2021). A three-phase QFD-based framework for identifying key passenger needs to improve satisfaction with the seat of high-speed rail in China. Transportation, 48(5), 2627–2662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10142-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study design and methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zainal Abidin, A. N., & Ingirige, B. (2018). The dynamics of vulnerabilities and capabilities in improving resilience within Malaysian construction supply chain. Construction Innovation, 18(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-09-2017-0079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare, A., Malakoutikhah, M., & Alimohammadlou, M. (2020). Selecting lighting system based on workers’ cognitive performance using fuzzy best–worst method and QUALIFLEX. Cognition, Technology & Work, 22(3), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00593-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarjou, M., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2022). Optimal project portfolio selection with reinvestment strategy considering sustainability in an uncertain environment: A multi-objective optimization approach. Kybernetes, 51(8), 2437–2460. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2020-0737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenouz, R. Y., Rad, F. H., Centobelli, P., & Cerchione, R. (2022). Knowledge management systems evaluation in food industry: A multicriteria decision-making approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3118667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Wu, Y., Wang, K., Peng, Y., Wang, D., Yao, S., & Wang, J. (2020). Materials selection of 3D-printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites considering multiple criteria. Materials & Design, 196, 109140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Srivastava, P. R., Eachempati, P., & Yu, Y. (2021). An intelligent framework for analyzing supply chain resilience of firms in China: A hybrid multicriteria approach. International Journal of Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2020-0452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar