Time uncertainty and random opinion based group decision making for demolition negotiations

References

• Akl, A. M., Sarker, R. A., & Essam, D. L. (2021). A two-stage simulation assisted differential evolution algorithm for reliable chance constrained programming with minimum risk level. Applied Soft Computing, 111(1), 107637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107637
   Google Scholar
• Chao, X., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Herrera-Viedma, E. E. (2021). Large-scale group decision-making with non-cooperative behaviours and heterogeneous preferences: An application in financial inclusion. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(1), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Wang, S.-G., Wang, P. P., & Ye, X. (2016). A new equivalent transformation for interval inequality constraints of interval linear programming. Fuzzy Optimisation and Decision Making, 15(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-015-9219-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conn, A. R., Gould, N., & Toint, P. L. (1997). A globally convergent Lagrangian barrier algorithm for optimisation with general inequality constraints and simple bounds. Mathematics of Computation, 66(217), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1137/0728030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucchiella, F., & Gastaldi, M. (2006). Risk management in supply chain: A real option approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(6), 700–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380610678756
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. R. (2006). House price uncertainty, timing of development, and vacant land prices: Evidence for real options in Seattle. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Luo, N., & Liang, H. (2015). Consensus building in multiperson decision making with heterogeneous preference representation structures: A perspective based on prospect theory. Applied Soft Computing, 35, 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Wu, S., Shi, X., Li, Y., & Chiclana, F. (2022). Clustering method with axiomatization to support failure mode and effect analysis. IISE Transactions, 6,1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2022.2068812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Zha, Q., Zhang, H., & Herrera, F. (2021). Consensus reaching and strategic manipulation in group decision making with trust relationships. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(10), 6304–6318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2019.2961752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Z.-P., Zhang, X., Chen, F.-D., & Liu, Y. (2013). Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels: A method based on prospect theory. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., Xu, C., Chiclana, F., & Xu, X. (2017). Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on China’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(2), 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9486-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., Xu, X., Guo, W., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cabrerizo, F. J. (2021). Minimum cost consensus modelling under various linear uncertain-constrained scenarios. Information Fusion, 66, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., Xu, X., Zhang, H., Aytun Ozturk, U., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Xu, C. (2015). The consensus models with interval preference opinions and their economic interpretation. Omega, 55, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guj, P., & Chandra, A. (2019). Comparing different real option valuation approaches as applied to a copper mine. Resources Policy, 61, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P., & Huang, G. H. (2009). Two-stage fuzzy chance-constrained programming: Application to water resources management under dual uncertainties. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0221-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Hooimeijer, P., Bolt, G., & Sun, D. (2015). Uneven compensation and relocation for displaced residents: The case of Nanjing. Habitat International, 47, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, E. C-m., Ng, I. M-h., & Lo, K.-k. (2011). Analysis of the viability of an urban renewal project under a risk-based option pricing framework. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, Q., Li, Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Modelling urban eco-environmental sustainability under uncertainty: Interval double-sided chance-constrained programming with spatial analysis. Ecological Indicators, 115, 106438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Olgu Akdeniz, Ö., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Fintech investments in European banks: A hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00256-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, N., Wang, L., & Zha, Q. (2022). Targeted allocation of marketing resource in networks based on opinion dynamics. Mathematics, 10(3), 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Kou, G., Li, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network. European Journal of Operational Research. 303(2), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2018). A group decision making model for integrating heterogeneous information. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48(6), 982–992. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2627050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2016). From victims to winners: Strategies of negotiation among relocated residents in demolition-compensation events in local China. China Journal of Social Work, 9(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2016.1141476
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Chen, S., & Gu, J. (2019). Urban renewal simulation with spatial, economic and policy dynamics: The rent-gap theory-based model and the case study of Chongqing. Land Use Policy, 86, 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Fan, Z.-P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Risk decision analysis in emergency response: A method based on cumulative prospect theory. Computers & Operations Research, 42, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Liu, C., & Ge, M. (2013). An order allocation model for the two-echelon logistics service supply chain based on cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Wei, L., Gu, J., Zhou, T., & Liu, Y. (2020). Benefit distribution in urban renewal from the perspectives of efficiency and fairness: A game theoretical model and the government’s role in China. Cities, 96, 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., & Xu, Z. (2018). Collaborative governance: A potential approach to preventing violent demolition in China. Cities, 79, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Zhou, T., & Forrest, J. Y.-L. (2020). A multivariate minimum cost consensus model for negotiations of holdout demolition. Group Decision and Negotiation, 29(5), 871–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09683-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Wang, X., Guo, H., & Ma, W. (2020). Multi-water resources optimal allocation based on multi-objective uncertain chance-constrained programming model. Water Resources Management, 34(15), 4881–4899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02697-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv, J., Li, Y., & Sun, J. (2018). Monte Carlo simulation based interval chance-constrained programming for regional ecosystem management–A case study of Zhuhai. China. Ecological Indicators, 85, 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigg, L. (1993). Empirical testing of real option‐pricing models. The Journal of Finance, 48(2), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04730.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, X., Gong, Z., Chiclana, F., & Zhang, N. (2018). Consensus modelling with cost chance constraint under uncertainty opinions. Applied Soft Computing, 67, 721–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titman, S. (1985). Urban land prices under uncertainty. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 505–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandoros, N., & Pantouvakis, J. (2006). Using real options in evaluating PPP/PFI projects. Symposium on sustainability and value through construction procurement. The Digital World Centre. Salford. United Kingdom
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Guo, P. (2021). The interval copula-measure Me based multi-objective multi-stage stochastic chance-constrained programming for seasonal water resources allocation under uncertainty. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35(7), 1463–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01913-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., Liu, B., Zhang, J., & Li, G. (2019). A real options‐based decision‐making model for infrastructure investment to prevent rainstorm disasters. Production and Operations Management, 28(11), 2699–2715. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Ning, Y. (2018). Uncertain chance-constrained programming model for project scheduling problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(3), 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0122-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Qin, Z. (2020). Chance constrained programming models for uncertain hub covering location problems. Soft Computing, 24(4), 2781–2791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04476-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Tang, W., & Jia, S. H. (2016). Uncertainty, competition and timing of land development: theory and empirical evidence from Hang Zhou, China. Social Science Electronic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-015-9517-0
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020). Prospect theory-based group decision-making with stochastic uncertainty and 2-tuple aspirations under linguistic assessments. Information Fusion, 56, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. T. (1991). Real estate development as an option. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. B., Huang, G. H., Li, W., Xie, Y. L., & Xu, Y. (2015). Multistage stochastic inexact chance-constraint programming for an integrated biomass-municipal solid waste power supply management under uncertainty. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1244–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Qin, X. S. (2010). Agricultural effluent control under uncertainty: An inexact double-sided fuzzy chance-constrained model. Advances in Water Resources, 33(9), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha, Q., Cai, J., Gu, J., & Liu, G. (2022). Information learning-driven consensus reaching process in group decision-making with bounded rationality and imperfect information: China’s urban renewal negotiation. Applied Intelligence, 32, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04019-9
   Google Scholar
• Zha, Q., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Consensus reaching in multiple attribute group decision making: A multi-stage optimisation feedback mechanism with individual bounded confidences. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(8), 3333–3346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3113571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., Gong, Z., & Chiclana, F. (2017). Minimum cost consensus models based on random opinions. Expert Systems with Applications, 89, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar