Hierarchical multi-criteria decision making with group voting information: New Tanino’s additive consistency intuitionistic fuzzy translation and utility vector acquisition

References

• Amenta, P., Ishizaka, A., Lucadamo, A., Marcarelli, G., & Vyas, V. (2020). Computing a common preference vector in a complex multi-actor and multi-group decision system in analytic hierarchy process context. Annals of Operations Research, 284(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03258-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beliakov, G., Bustince, H., Goswami, D. P., Mukherjee, U. K., & Pal, N. R. (2011). On averaging operators for Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 181(6), 1116–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B., Ishizaka, A., Olivieri, M. G., & Squillante, M. (2019). Comparing inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrices depending on entries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1464427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. P., & Xu, G. Q. (2019). Group decision making with incomplete intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Li, H., & Tan, C. (2019). An intuitionstic fuzzy factorial analysis model for multi-attribute decision-making under random environment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2017.1421849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J., Liu, X., Wang, Y., & Chin, K. S. (2016). A group decision making model considering both the additive consistency and group consensus of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duleba, S. (2022). Introduction and comparative analysis of the multi-level parsimonious AHP methodology in a public transport development decision problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1824553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedrizzi, M., & Brunelli, M. (2010). On the priority vector associated with a reciprocal relation and a pairwise comparison matrix. Soft Computing, 14(6), 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0432-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., Tan, X., & Yang, Y. (2019). Optimal weighting models based on linear uncertain constraints in intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(8), 1296–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1489349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Z. W., Li, L. S., Forrest, J., & Zhao, Y. (2011). The optimal priority models of the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and their application in selecting industries with higher meteorological sensitivity. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4394–4402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, W., Gong, Z., Xu, X., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2021). Additive and multiplicative consistency modeling for incomplete linear uncertain preference relations and its weight acquisition. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(4), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2965909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., & Xu, Z. (2021). An overview on recent researches of uncertain group decision making: Methodology, framework and development. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 20(01), 165–198. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622021500048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Siraj, S. (2018). Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Martínez, L. (2020). Analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy sorting: An analytic hierarchy process-based method for fuzzy classification in sorting problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(6), 928–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1595188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorshidi, H. A., & Aickelin, U. (2021). Multicriteria group decision-making under uncertainty using interval data and cloud models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(11), 2542–2556. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1796541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K., Mazurek, J., & Strada, M. (2022). On the similarity between ranking vectors in the pairwise comparison method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(9), 2080–2089. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1947754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, K., & Chen, S. M. (2022). Group decision making based on advanced intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Heronian mean aggregation operator of intuitionistic fuzzy values. Information Sciences, 601, 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Mi, X., Xu, Z., Xu, J., & Herrera, F. (2018). Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic network process. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(5), 2578–2590. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2788881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Tan, X., Yang, H., & Zhao, H. (2020). Decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with additive approximate consistency. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39(3), 4041–4058. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-200200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, F., Pedrycz, W., & Tang, J. (2021). Research on the consistency of additive trapezoidal fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 186, 115837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi, X., Liao, H., & Zeng, X. J. (2022). Transitivity and approximate consistency threshold determination for reciprocal preference relations in group decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(7), 1649–1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1928560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedashkovskaya, N. I. (2018). Investigation of methods for improving consistency of a pairwise comparison matrix. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(12), 1947–1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2017.1415640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, H., Kim, H., Kim, H., & Kim, C. (2022). A method for improving the multiplicative inconsistency based on indeterminacy of an intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation. Information Sciences, 602, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.03.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, V., & Bamel, U. (2022). Charting the managerial and theoretical evolutionary path of AHP using thematic and systematic review: A decadal (2012–2021) study. Annals of Operations Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04540-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, D., & Garg, H. (2021). Complex intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their applications in individual and group decision-making problems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(4), 1800–1830. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J., Meng, F. Y., & Zhang, S. L. (2021). Consistency comparison analysis of decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(4), 926–940. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2919559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J., Meng, F. Y., & Zhang, Y. L. (2018). Decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency analysis. Information Sciences, 467, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanino, T. (1984). Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, X., & Wang, Z. J. (2022). New additive-consistency-driven methods for deriving two types of normalized utility vectors from additive reciprocal preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2096503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, J., Wu, Z., & Xu, J. (2022). Geometric consistency index for interval pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2075803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, S., Wang, F., & Dong, J. (2017). Additive consistent interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and likelihood comparison algorithm based group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(2), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2022). Uncertainty measures of complex preference relations for decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2102944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J. (2013). Derivation of intuitionistic fuzzy weights based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(9), 6377–6388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J. (2020). A representable uninorm-based intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 28(10), 2555–2569. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2941174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J., Liu, F. Q., Qin, S. T., & Jin, X. T. (2022). New additive consistency framework and utility derivation for interval fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(11), 2572–2590. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.2004947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Li, M., & Pedrycz, W. (2022). Verifying and managing additive consistency and deriving weights for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2096502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. (2007a). Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences, 177(11), 2363–2379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. (2007b). Approaches to multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. Systems Engineering – Theory & Practice, 27(11), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-8651(08)60069-1
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., & Liao, H. (2014). Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2272585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., Jhang, S. T., Fu, Z. W., Xu, Z. S., & Ma, Z. M. (2021). A novel method to derive the intuitionistic fuzzy priority vectors from intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Soft Computing, 25(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05472-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., Jhang, S. T., Shi, S. G., Xu, Z. S., & Ma, Z. M. (2020). A novel additive consistency for intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Applied Intelligence, 50(12), 4342–4356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01796-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Li, Y., & Wu, C. (2020). An extended TODIM method to rank products with online reviews under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(2), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1545519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar