Consensus reaching for ordinal classification-based group decision making with heterogeneous preference information

References

• Angilella, S., & Mazzù, S. (2015). The financing of innovative SMEs: A multicriteria credit rating model. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(2), 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono, S. G., Corrente, S., & Greco, S. (2021). Robust stochastic sorting with interacting criteria hierarchically structured. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(2), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, X., Dong, Y., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). How to determine the consensus threshold in group decision making: A method based on efficiency benchmark using benefit and cost insight. Annals of Operations Research, 316(1), 143–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03927-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, X., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Viedma, E. H. (2021). Large-scale group decision-making with non-cooperative behaviors and heterogeneous preferences: An application in financial inclusion. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(1), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Xu, W., Liang, H., & Dong, Y. (2020). The classification-based consensus in multi-attribute group decision-making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(9), 1375–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1609888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (2007). Multiple-criteria sorting using case-based distance models with an application in water resources management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 37(5), 680–691. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2007.902629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Machine Learning, 93(2–3), 381–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-013-5365-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. S., Govindan, K., & Figueira, J. R. (2018). Supplier classification in emerging economies using the ELECTRE TRI-nC method: A case study considering sustainability aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 925–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damart, S., Dias, L. C., & Mousseau, V. (2007). Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS. Decision Support Systems, 43(4), 1464–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Morais Bezerra, F., Melo, P., & Costa, J. P. (2017). Reaching consensus with VICA-ELECTRE TRI: A case study. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(6), 1145–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-017-9539-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Wu, S., Shi, X., Li, Y., & Chiclana, F. (2022). Clustering method with axiomatization to support failure mode and effect analysis. IISE Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2022.2068812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douissa, M. R., & Jabeur, K. (2020). A non-compensatory classification approach for multi-criteria ABC analysis. Soft Computing, 24(13), 9525–9556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04462-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M., & Figueira, J. R. (2019). A multicriteria outranking approach for modeling corporate credit ratings: An application of the Electre Tri-nC method. Omega, 82, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2011). Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 209(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattoruso, G., Barbati, M., Ishizaka, A., & Squillante, M. (2023). A hybrid AHPSort II and multi-objective portfolio selection method to support quality control in the automotive industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(1), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2033140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gai, T., Cao, M., Chiclana, F., Zhang, Z., Dong, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Wu, J. (2023). Consensus-trust driven bidirectional feedback mechanism for improving consensus in social network large-group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 32(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-022-09798-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(11), 2518–2535. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1997654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2011). Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting. Computers & Operations Research, 38(11), 1620–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, M., Liao, X., & Liu, J. (2019). A progressive sorting approach for multiple criteria decision aiding in the presence of non-monotonic preferences. Expert Systems with Applications, 123, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Khan, S. A., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Naim, I. (2022). Sustainable warehouse evaluation with AHPSort traffic light visualisation and post-optimal analysis method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(3), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1848361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabeur, K., & Martel, J.-M. (2007). An ordinal sorting method for group decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(3), 1272–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacprzyk, J., & Fedrizzi, M. (1988). A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. European Journal of Operational Research, 34(3), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90152-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2013). DIS-CARD: A new method of multiple criteria sorting to classes with desired cardinality. Journal of Global Optimization, 56(3), 1143–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9945-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadziński, M., Ciomek, K., & Słowiński, R. (2015). Modeling assignment-based pairwise comparisons within integrated framework for value-driven multiple criteria sorting. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(3), 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labella, A., Ishizaka, A., & Martínez, L. (2021). Consensual Group-AHPSort: Applying consensus to GAHPSort in sustainable development and industrial engineering. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 152, 107013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.107013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labella, A., Liu, H., Rodríguez, R. M., & Martínez, L. (2020). A cost consensus metric for consensus reaching processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model. European Journal of Operational Research, 281(2), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., Liang, H., Pedrycz, W., & Herrera, F. (2022). Data-driven method to learning personalized individual semantics to support linguistic multi-attribute decision making. Omega, 111, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). Heterogeneous large-scale group decision making using fuzzy cluster analysis and its application to emergency response plan selection. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(6), 3391–3403. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.3068759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Kou, G., Li, G., & Peng, Y. (2022). Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network. European Journal of Operational Research, 303(2), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Zhang, Z., & Yu, W. (2022). Consensus reaching with consistency control in group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 170, 108311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Liao, X., & Yang, J.-B. (2015). A group decision-making approach based on evidential reasoning for multiple criteria sorting problem with uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(3), 858–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Liao, X., Huang, W., & Liao, X. (2019). Market segmentation: A multiple criteria approach combining preference analysis and segmentation decision. Omega, 83, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Liao, X., Huang, W., & Yang, J.-B. (2018). A new decision-making approach for multiple criteria sorting with an imbalanced set of assignment examples. European Journal of Operational Research, 265(2), 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Xu, Y., & Dong, Y. (2022). Classification-based strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 197, 116781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau, V., & Slowinski, R. (1998). Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Journal of Global Optimization, 12(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008210427517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, J., & Wu, Z. (2022). H-rank consensus models for fuzzy preference relations considering eliminating rank violations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(6), 2004–2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3073238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Wu, J., Chiclana, F., Sun, Q., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Two-stage feedback mechanism with different power structures for consensus in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(10), 4177–4189. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3144536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., Wang, X., & Zhang, H. (2020). Managing classification-based consensus in social network group decision making: An optimization-based approach with minimum information loss. Information Fusion, 63, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., Wang, X., & Zhang, H. (2022). Exploring the ordinal classifications of failure modes in the reliability management: An optimization-based consensus model with bounded confidences. Group Decision and Negotiation, 31(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09756-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Dong, Y., Xu, Y., & Li, H. (2011). Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 41(6), 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2113336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Palomares-Carrascosa, I., & Zhou, H. (2019). Failure mode and effect analysis in a linguistic context: A consensus-based multiattribute group decision-making approach. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 68(2), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2018.2869787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Wang, F., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Social trust driven consensus reaching model with a minimum adjustment feedback mechanism considering assessments-modifications willingness. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(6), 2019–2031. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3073251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Zhao, S., Kou, G., Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., & Herrera, F. (2020). An overview on feedback mechanisms with minimum adjustment or cost in consensus reaching in group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. Information Fusion, 60, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Zhu, W., Chen, X., Wu, Y., Liang, H., Li, C.-C., & Dong, Y. (2022). Managing flexible linguistic expression and ordinal classification-based consensus in large-scale multi-attribute group decision making. Annals of Operations Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04687-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Li, Z. (2022a). Consensus-based TOPSIS-Sort-B for multi-criteria sorting in the context of group decision-making. Annals of Operations Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04985-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Li, Z. (2022b). Personalized individual semantics-based consistency control and consensus reaching in linguistic group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(9), 5623–5635. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.3129510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Li, Z., & Gao, Y. (2021). Consensus reaching for group decision making with multi-granular unbalanced linguistic information: A bounded confidence and minimum adjustment-based approach. Information Fusion, 74, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar