Incentivizing centrally regulated units to improve performance: Pitfalls and requirements

References

• Afsharian, M. (2022). Prescriptive analytics in benchmarking, incentive regulation and contract design, Habilitation, Univers.-Bibl. Braunschweig.
   Google Scholar
• Afsharian, M. (2020). A metafrontier-based yardstick competition mechanism for incentivising units in centrally managed multi-group organisations. Annals of Operations Research, 288(2), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03201-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsharian, M. (2021). A frontier-based facility location problem with a centralised view of measuring the performance of the network. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(5), 1058–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1639476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsharian, M., & Ahn, H. (2017). Multi-period productivity measurement under centralized management with an empirical illustration to German saving banks. Or Spectrum, 39(3), 881–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-016-0465-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsharian, M., Ahn, H., & Harms, S. G. (2021). A review of DEA approaches applying a common set of weights: The perspective of centralized management. European Journal of Operational Research, 294(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsharian, M., Ahn, H., & Kamali, S. (2022). Performance analytics in incentive regulation: A literature review of DEA publications. Decision Analytics Journal, 4, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100079)
   Google Scholar
• Afsharian, M., Ahn, H., & Thanassoulis, E. (2017). A DEA-based incentives system for centrally managed multi-unit organisations. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsharian, M., Ahn, H., & Thanassoulis, E. (2019). A frontier-based system of incentives for units in organisations with varying degrees of decentralisation. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(1), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsharian, M., & Bogetoft, P. (2020). Identifying production units with outstanding performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(3), 1191–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrell, P. J., & Bogetoft, P. (2017). Regulatory benchmarking: Models, analyses and applications. Data Envelopment Analysis Journal, 3(1-2), 49–91. https://doi.org/10.1561/103.00000017
   Google Scholar
• Agrell, P. J., & Bogetoft, P. (2018). Theory, techniques, and applications of regulatory benchmarking and productivity analysis. The Oxford handbook of productivity analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agrell, P. J., Bogetoft, P., & Tind, J. (2002). Incentive plans for productive efficiency, innovation and learning. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00097-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrell, P. J., Bogetoft, P., & Tind, J. (2005). DEA and dynamic yardstick competition in Scandinavian electricity distribution. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(2), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-005-1327-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q., Tao, X., Xiong, B., & Chen, X. (2022). Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 302(1), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N., Govindarajan, V., Hartmann, F. G. H., Kraus, K., & Nilsson, G. (2014). Management control systems. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Antle, R., & Bogetoft, P. (2019). Mix stickiness under asymmetric cost information. Management Science, 65(6), 2787–2812. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmild, M., Paradi, J. C., & Pastor, J. T. (2009). Centralized resource allocation BCC models. Omega, 37(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnberg, J. G., & Snodgrass, C. (1988). Culture and control: A field study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90016-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P. (1997). DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018985313272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P. (2000). DEA and activity planning under asymmetric information. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13(1), 7–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007812822633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P. (2013). Performance benchmarking: Measuring and managing performance. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P., & Eskesen, A. (2022). Balancing information rents and service differentiation in utility regulation. Energy Economics, 106, 105808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105808)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P., & Hougaard, J. L. (1999). Efficiency evaluations based on potential (non-proportional) improvements. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007848222681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: Theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4-5), 303–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottasso, A., & Conti, M. (2009). Price cap regulation and the ratchet effect: A generalized index approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 32(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-009-0140-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camanho, A. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2005). Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: A DEA application to bank branch assessments. European Journal of Operational Research, 161(2), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Q., Li, Y., Lei, X., & Wu, D. (2021). A DEA-based incentive approach for allocating common revenues or fixed costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(2), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davtalab-Olyaie, M., Mahmudi-Baram, H., & Asgharian, M. (2021). Incentivizing units in centralized systems: A slacks-based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(8), 1724–1741. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1932620.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1994.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. L. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, L. (2020). An incentive approach based on data envelopment analysis for intra-organization yardstick competition. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1527190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamholtz, E. G., Das, T. K., & Tsui, A. S. (1985). Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90030-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. G., & Welsh, M. A. (1988). Cybernetics and dependence: Reframing the control concept. The Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/258578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., Agrell, P. J., Lotfi, F. H., & Beigi, Z. G. (2015). A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 79, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C., & Hung, H. T. (2005). Data Envelopment Analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(10), 1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2004). Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22(1/2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000034748.22820.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package: Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar-Molinero, C., Prior, D., Segovia, M. M., & Portillo, F. (2014). On centralized resource utilization and its reallocation by using DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 221(1), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1083-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pernot, E., & Roodhooft, F. (2014). The impact of inter-organizational management control systems on performance: A retrospective case study of an automotive supplier relationship. International Journal of Production Economics, 158(C), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.029
   Google Scholar
• Portela, M. C. A. S., Borges, P. C., & Thanassoulis, E. (2003). Finding closest targets in non-oriented DEA models: The case of convex and non-convex technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2/3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022813702387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, Y., Cook, W. D., & Golany, B. (1991). Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis. IIE Transactions, 23(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179108963835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2016). Common benchmarking and ranking of units with DEA. Omega, 65, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. (1985). A theory of yardstick competition. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(3), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1987). Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(4), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E. (1999). Setting achievement targets for school children. Education Economics, 7(2), 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., Blake, C., & Parthasarathy, S. (2022). Implicit and explicit incentives within economic regulation. Decision Analytics Journal, 4, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100099
   Google Scholar
• Varmaz, A., Varwig, A., & Poddig, T. (2013). Centralized resource planning and yardstick competition. Omega, 41(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvinger, S. (2000). Industry performance and structural efficiency measures: Solutions to problems in firm models. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377‐2217(99)00014‐4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar