Effectiveness of environmental regulations: firm’s decisions and welfare implications

References

• Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Machado, V. C. (2011). The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 850–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Q., Chen, M., & Xu, L. (2017). Revenue and promotional cost-sharing contract versus two-part tariff contract in coordinating sustainable supply chain systems with deteriorating items. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Q., Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Emission reduction decision and coordination of a make-to-order supply chain with two products under cap-and-trade regulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Khosla, I., & Sinha, K. K. (1998). Quality and competition. Management Science, 44(9), 1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, B., Ma, J., & Goh, M. (2020). Short-and long-term repeated game behaviours of two parallel supply chains based on government subsidy in the vehicle market. International Journal of Production Research, 58(24), 7507–7530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1711988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran, S. R., & Krishnan, V. (2009). Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Science, 55(7), 1152–1169. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, K., He, P., & Liu, Z. (2020). Production and pricing decisions in a dual-channel supply chain under remanufacturing subsidy policy and carbon tax policy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(8), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1605471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, K., Xu, X., Wu, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Optimal production and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade and low carbon subsidy policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro, F., Corbett, C. J., Tan, T., & Zuidwijk, R. (2013). Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15(4), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2013.0443
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Chan, C. K., & Lee, Y. (2016). Responsible production policies with substitution and carbon emissions trading. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-Y., Dimitrov, S., & Pun, H. (2019). The impact of government subsidy on supply chains’ sustainability innovation. Omega, 86, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, F., Chen, T., & Chen, Q. (2022). Cost-reducing strategy or emission-reducing strategy? The choice of low-carbon decisions under price threshold subsidy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 157, 102560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P., Ji, G., Zhang, G., & Shi, Y. (2022). A closed-loop supply chain network considering consumer’s low carbon preference and carbon tax under the cap-and-trade regulation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Hao, G. (2015). Sustainable pricing and production policies for two competing firms with carbon emissions tax. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6408–6420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.932928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y-h., Wang, C., Nie, P-y., & Chen, Z-r (2020). A clean innovation comparison between carbon tax and cap-and-trade system. Energy Strategy Reviews, 29, 100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Wu, Y., Ji, A., & Xu, X. (2021). Offering subsidies to logistics providers and consignors. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1650622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. C., Lobel, R., & Perakis, G. (2016). The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Management Science, 62(5), 1235–1258. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan, B., Xu, G., & Liu, C. (2012). Pricing policies in a dual-channel supply chain with retail services. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, P. S. (2000). Multiple messages to retain retailers: Signaling new product demand. Marketing Science, 19(4), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.4.381.11793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, P., & Srinivasan, K. (1995). A franchise management issue: Demand signaling under unobservable service. Management Science, 41(10), 1608–1623. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.10.1608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, C., Shen, B., Chow, P.-S., Yang, L., & Ng, C. T. (2016). Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1514-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, S., Ma, F., Fu, Z., Zhu, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system. Annals of Operations Research, 228(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0964-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., Sim, J., & Kim, B. (2021). Pollution accumulation and abatement policies in two supply chains under vertical and horizontal competition and strategy types. Omega, 98, 102108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, C. (2014). Pricing carbon: A carbon tax or cap-and-trade. Brookings Institute, 12, 1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, D., & Shah, J. (2015). Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, D., Shah, J., & Swami, S. (2020). Product greening and pricing strategies of firms under green sensitive consumer demand and environmental regulations. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1–2), 491–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2903-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., & Schein, A. R. (2013). Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: A critical review. Climate Change Economics, 04(03), 1350010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007813500103
   Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., Schein, A. (2009). Carbon taxes vs. cap and trade. Stanford University Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Gugler, K., Haxhimusa, A., & Liebensteiner, M. (2021). Effectiveness of climate policies: Carbon pricing vs. subsidizing renewables. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 106, 102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezalkotob, A. (2015). Competition of two green and regular supply chains under environmental protection and revenue seeking policies of government. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammami, R., Nouira, I., & Frein, Y. (2018). Effects of customers’ environmental awareness and environmental regulations on the emission intensity and price of a product. Decision Sciences, 49(6), 1116–1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, P., Dou, G., & Zhang, W. (2017). Optimal production planning and cap setting under cap-and-trade regulation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(9), 1094–1105. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0123-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini-Motlagh, S.-M., Ebrahimi, S., & Jokar, A. (2021). Sustainable supply chain coordination under competition and green effort scheme. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(2), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1671152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, H., & Zhou, W. (2014). The impact of carbon tax policy on the carbon emission reduction and profit. International Journal of Smart Home, 8(5), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2014.8.5.16
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. W., & Subramanian, R. (2012). Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jena, S. K., Ghadge, A., & Sarmah, S. P. (2018). Managing channel profit and total surplus in a closed-loop supply chain network. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(9), 1345–1356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2017.1392408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, T., Xu, X., Yan, X., & Yu, Y. (2020). The production decisions and cap setting with wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts under cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1641239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, J., Zhang, Z., & Yang, L. (2017). Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-/dual-channel supply chain with consumers’ preference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 852–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, N. (2016). Carbon tax vs. cap-and-trade: What’s a better policy to cut emissions?
   Google Scholar
• Krass, D., Nedorezov, T., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2013). Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production and Operations Management, 22(5), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiti, M. R., Ghosh, D., Basu, P., & Bisi, A. (2020). Do cap-and-trade policies drive environmental and social goals in supply chains: Strategic decisions, collaboration, and contract choices. International Journal of Production Economics, 223, 107537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lade, G. E., & Lawell, C.-Y C. L. (2015). The design and economics of low carbon fuel standards. Research in Transportation Economics, 52, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebeau, P., Macharis, C., & Van Mierlo, J. (2016). Exploring the choice of battery electric vehicles in city logistics: A conjoint-based choice analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 91, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2019). Operational decision model with carbon cap allocation and carbon trading price. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5010011
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Du, W., Yang, F., & Hua, G. (2014). The carbon subsidy analysis in remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain. Sustainability, 6(6), 3861–3877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6063861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Li, L., & Sun, J. (2019). Pricing and service effort strategy in a dual-channel supply chain with showrooming effect. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 126, 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Holmbom, M., Segerstedt, A., & Chen, W. (2015). Effects of carbon emission regulations on remanufacturing decisions with limited information of demand distribution. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.957875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Xiao, T., & Qiu, Y. (2018). Price and carbon emission reduction decisions and revenue-sharing contract considering fairness concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luk, J. M., Saville, B. A., & MacLean, H. L. (2016). Vehicle attribute trade-offs to meet the 2025 cafe fuel economy target. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 49, 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W-m., Zhao, Z., & Ke, H. (2013). Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, R., Hafezalkotob, A., & Makui, A. (2014). Source selection problem of competitive power plants under government intervention: A game theory approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 10(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-014-0059-5
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G. E. (2009). Tax policies for low-carbon technologies. National Tax Journal, 62(3), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.3.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, S., Rabe, B. G., & Borick, C. P. (2015). Cap-and-trade support linked to revenue use. Issues in Energy and Environmental Policy, (23), June 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2651682.
   Google Scholar
• Nault, B. R. (1996). Equivalence of taxes and subsidies in the control of production externalities. Management Science, 42(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, R., & Saha, B. (2014). Mixed duopoly and environment. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 16(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, R., & Saha, B. (2015). Pollution tax, partial privatization and environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 40, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadis, E., & Tsatsaronis, G. (2020). Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy, 205, 118025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, S. T. (1995). The damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculations. Environmental & Resource Economics, 5(4), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691574
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., Rosado, P. (2022). Which countries have put a price on carbon? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/carbon-pricing.
   Google Scholar
• Saint Jean, M. (2008). Polluting emissions standards and clean technology trajectories under competitive selection and supply chain pressure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), S113–S123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Savaskan, R. C., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailers. Management Science, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, L., Yang, J., & Zhang, M. (2017). Subsidy scheme or price discount scheme? Mass adoption of electric vehicles under different market structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), 1181–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau, C.-S N., Michalek, J. J., & Hendrickson, C. T. (2009). A structural analysis of vehicle design responses to corporate average fuel economy policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(9–10), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinayi, M., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2018). A game theoretic approach for pricing, greening, and social welfare policies in a supply chain with government intervention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1443–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Paladino, A. (2010). Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., & Leng, M. (2012). Analysis of the single-period problem under carbon emissions policies. In Handbook of Newsvendor Problems (pp. 297–313). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spearing, J. (2021). We need to look beyond the market to beat climate change. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/bb92c7aa-aa1d-4797-9739-81ce1054ceaa
   Google Scholar
• Stavins, R. N. (2008). Cap-and-trade or a carbon tax? The Environmental Forum, 26, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Stavins, R. N. (2020). The future of US carbon-pricing policy. Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, 1, 8–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/706792
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change. American Economic Review, 98(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvonen, O. (1995). Dynamics of pollution control when damage is sensitive to the rate of pollution accumulation. Environmental & Resource Economics, 5(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691907
   Google Scholar
• Tang, C. S., & Zhou, S. (2012). Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(3), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay, A. A., & Agrawal, N. (2000). Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2(4), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2.4.372.12342
   Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, J., Castro, J., Drews, S., Exadaktylos, F., Foramitti, J., Klein, F., Konc, T., & Savin, I. (2021). Designing an effective climate-policy mix: Accounting for instrument synergy. Climate Policy, 21(6), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1907276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Brownlee, A. E., & Wu, Q. (2020). Production and joint emission reduction decisions based on two-way cost-sharing contract under cap-and-trade regulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 146, 106549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Wang, H., & Shang, J. (2019). Multi-sourcing and information sharing under competition and supply uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 278(2), 658–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.04.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., He, P., Xu, H., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., Xu, X., & He, P. (2016). Joint production and pricing decisions for multiple products with cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4093–4106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., & Chen, W. (2018). Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus cost-sharing. Omega, 78, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Luo, J., & Wang, H. (2017). The role of revenue sharing and first-mover advantage in emission abatement with carbon tax and consumer environmental awareness. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Xu, X. (2023). Production and carbon emission abatement decisions under different carbon policies: Supply chain network equilibrium models with consumers’ low-carbon awareness. International Transactions in Operational Research. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Zhang, Q., & Ji, J. (2017). Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Zheng, C., & Xu, M. (2014). Comparisons of low carbon policies in supply chain coordination. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 23(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-014-5249-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonghong, C., & Zhongkai, X. (2015). The optimal emission reduction and pricing strategies and coordination based on the perspective of supply chain under carbon tax policy. Science Research Management, 36(6), 81.
   Google Scholar
• Yuyin, Y., & Jinxi, L. (2018). The effect of governmental policies of carbon taxes and energy-saving subsidies on enterprise decisions in a two-echelon supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., & Xu, L. (2013). Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar