Decision behaviour and performance in a paired newsvendor: The role of peer effects

References

• Alauddin, M., & Nghiem, H. S. (2010). Do instructional attributes pose multicollinearity problems? an empirical exploration. Economic Analysis and Policy, 40(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(10)50034-1
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., Harris, T., & Marschak, J. (1951). Optimal inventory policy. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 19(3), 250–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avc I, B., Loutfi, Z., Mihm, J., Belavina, E., & Keck, S. (2014). Comparison as incentive: Newsvendor decisions in a social context. Production and Operations Management, 23(2), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker-Peth, M., Thonemann, U. W., & Gully, T. (2018). A note on the risk aversion of informed newsvendors. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(7), 1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2017.1390525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, R., Rios, I., & Saban, D. (2021). Increased transparency in procurement: The role of peer effects. Management Science, 67(12), 7511–7534. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzion, U., Cohen, Y., Peled, R., & Shavit, T. (2008). Decision-making and the newsvendor problem: An experimental study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(9), 1281–1287. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzion, U., Cohen, Y., & Shavit, T. (2010). The newsvendor problem with unknown distribution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(6), 1022–1031. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. E., & Katok, E. (2008). Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(3), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1060.0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., & Thonemann, U. W. (2012). Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Science, 58(12), 2225–2233. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostian, A. A., Holt, C. A., & Smith, A. M. (2008). Newsvendor “pull-to-center” effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1080.0228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursztyn, L., Ederer, F., Ferman, B., & Yuchtman, N. (2014). Understanding mechanisms underlying peer effects: Evidence from a field experiment on financial decisions. Econometrica, 82(4), 1273–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., VanYperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda, J. A., & Gonçalves, P. (2015). Kicking the” mean” habit: Joint prepositioning in debiasing pull-to-center effects. The handbook of behavioral operations management: Social and psychological dynamics in production and service settings (pp. 238–250). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çelen, B., & Hyndman, K. (2012). Social learning through endogenous information acquisition: An experiment. Management Science, 58(8), 1525–1548. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. J., & Rege, M. (2011). Misery loves company: Social regret and social interaction effects in choices under risk and uncertainty. Games and Economic Behavior, 73(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, R., Gallino, S., Moreno, A., & Zhang, D. J. (2018). The operational value of social media information. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1749–1769. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, S., & Satten, G. A. (2005). Rank-sum tests for clustered data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(471), 908–915. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000001583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Véricourt, F., Jain, K., Bearden, J. N., & Filipowicz, A. (2013). Sex, risk and the newsvendor. Journal of Operations Management, 31(1-2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckerd, S., & Bendoly, E. (2015). The study of behavioral operations. In The handbook of behavioral operations management: Social and psychological dynamics in production and service settings (pp. 33–43).
   Google Scholar
• Feng, T., Keller, L. R., & Zheng, X. (2011). Decision making in the newsvendor problem: A cross-national laboratory study. Omega, 39(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U. (2007). Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 8(6), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Pearson Education India.
   Google Scholar
• Guimond, S., & Chatard, A. (2014). Basic principles of social comparison: Does gender matter. Communal Functions of Social Comparison, 205, 205–229.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, T. H., Lim, N., & Cui, T. H. (2010). Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Science, 56(11), 1891–1910. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, T. H., Su, X., & Wu, Y. (2014). Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design. Production and Operations Management, 23(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000040
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., He, X., Lee, M. L. T., Rosner, B., & Yan, J. (2017). Wilcoxon rank-based tests for clustered data with r package clusrank. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03409.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Attention: Theory and practice (Sage.).
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkancı, B., Chen, K., & Erhun, F. (2014). Complexity as a contract design factor: A human-to-human experimental study. Production and Operations Management, 23(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Gigerenzer, G. (2013). Behavioral operations management: A blind spot and a research program. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2012.03285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, S., & Tang, W. (2018). Gender composition and group confidence judgment: The perils of all-male groups. Management Science, 64(12), 5877–5898. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, M., Minner, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2010). Do random errors explain newsvendor behavior? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 12(4), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1100.0294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. L., & Lee, C. Y. (2007). Building supply chain excellence in emerging economies (Vol. 98). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. L., So, K. C., & Tang, C. S. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46(5), 626–643. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.5.626.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S., & Siemsen, E. (2017). Task decomposition and newsvendor decision making. Management Science, 63(10), 3226–3245. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, V., Michael, E., Balaguer, J., Herce Castañón, S., & Summerfield, C. (2018). Gain control explains the effect of distraction in human perceptual, cognitive, and economic decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(38), E8825–E8834. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805224115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. F., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, X., & Nasiry, J. (2015). Prospect theory explains newsvendor behavior: The role of reference points. Management Science, 61(12), 3009–3012. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurie, N. H., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2009). Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisión Processes, 108(2), 315–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8(6), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00455.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz, B. B., Hill, A. V., & Donohue, K. L. (2013). Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: Behavior and cognitive reflection. Journal of Operations Management, 31(1-2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockenfels, A., & Selten, R. (2014). Impulse balance in the newsvendor game. Games and Economic Behavior, 86, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozili, P. K. (2023). The acceptable r-square in empirical modelling for social science research. Social research methodology and publishing results: A guide to non-native English speakers (pp. 134–143). IGI global.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritschet, L., Powell, D., & Horne, Z. (2016). Marginally significant effects as evidence for hypotheses: Changing attitudes over four decades. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., C. Croson, D., & T.a. Croson, R. (2017). The overconfident newsvendor. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(5), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0103-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., & Croson, R. (2013). Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study. Management Science, 59(11), 2502–2517. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R., & Agrell, T. (1997). The effect of cognitive style and cognitive skills on school subject performance. Educational Studies, 23(2), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569970230213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roels, G., & Su, X. (2014). Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Science, 60(3), 606–627. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner, B., & Glynn, R. J. (2011). Power and sample size estimation for the clustered wilcoxon test. Biometrics, 67(2), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01488.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudi, N., & Drake, D. (2014). Observation bias: The impact of demand censoring on newsvendor level and adjustment behavior. Management Science, 60(5), 1334–1345. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffels, S., Fügener, A., Kolisch, R., & Brunner, O. J. (2014). On the assessment of costs in a newsvendor environment: Insights from an experimental study. Omega, 43, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., & Cachon, G. P. (2000). Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Science, 46(3), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.3.404.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokoohyar, S., & Katok, E. (2022). Incentivizing suppliers using scorecard: A behavioral study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(5), 1105–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1886615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, X. (2008). Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 566–589. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J., Lemos, K., & Stewart, H. L. (2002). Self-esteem, construal, and comparisons with the self, friends, and peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.252-261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, J., & Feiler, D. (2017). A behavioral model of forecasting: Naive statistics on mental samples. Management Science, 63(11), 3609–3627. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppari, B. S., & Hasija, S. (2019). Modeling newsvendor behavior: A prospect theory approach. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(3), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vipin, B., & Amit, R. (2019). Describing decision bias in the newsvendor problem: A prospect theory model. Omega, 82, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vörösmarty, G., & Dobos, I. (2020). Green purchasing frameworks considering firm size: A multicollinearity analysis using variance inflation factor. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21(4), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1776090
   Google Scholar
• Wayment, H. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1995). Self-evaluation processes: Motives, information use, and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 63(4), 729–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00315.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L., Kunc, M., Burger, K., & Malpass, J. (2020). Behavioral operational research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, D., Zhu, W., Zhao, X., & Xie, J. (2021). An experimental study on the sale of counterfeit products under monitoring policies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1650623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Zhao, X., & Max Shen, Z. J. (2016). On learning process of a newsvendor with censored demand information. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(9), 1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2016.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, S., Zhao, X., Zhu, W., & Xie, J. (2023). Ex-ante versus ex-post buyback pricing: An experimental study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(5), 1211–1228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2075802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar