Eliciting personalized AHP scale from verbal pairwise comparisons

References

• Abastante, F., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., & Lami, I. M. (2019). A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects. Expert Systems with Applications, 127, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, F., & Kilic, K. (2023). A basic algorithm for generating an individualized numerical scale. Expert Systems with Applications, 233, 120915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120915
   Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Roy, B. (2018). On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application. European Journal of Operational Research, 271(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2019). Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, B., & Ishizaka, A. (2023). Evaluating scales for pairwise comparisons. Annals of Operations Research, 325(2), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04682-8
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Hong, W.-C., Xu, Y., & Yu, S. (2013). Numerical scales generated individually for analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(3), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 33(11), 1383–1403. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizingh, E. K., & Vrolijk, H. C. (1997). A comparison of verbal and numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Balkenborg, D., & Kaplan, T. (2011). Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(4), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2009). Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: Benefits and limitations. Or Insight, 22(4), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2009.10
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Nguyen, N. H. (2013). Calibrated fuzzy AHP for current bank account selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3775–3783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Martínez, L. (2017). Personalized individual semantics in computing with words for supporting linguistic group decision making. An application on consensus reaching. Information Fusion, 33, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, L., Wang, G., Hua, Z., & Zhang, B. (2008). Mapping verbal responses to numerical scales in the analytic hierarchy process. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2005.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Liberatore, M. J., & Nydick, R. L. (2008). The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lootsma, F. (1989). Conflict resolution via pairwise comparison of concessions. European Journal of Operational Research, 40(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(89)90278-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meesariganda, B. R., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). Mapping verbal AHP scale to numerical scale for cloud computing strategy selection. Applied Soft Computing, 53, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohekar, S., & Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning-a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8(4), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokou, E., & Kirytopoulos, K. (2014). A calibrated group decision process. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23(6), 1369–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-013-9374-2
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, N., & Ramanathan, R. (2012). A review of applications of analytic hierarchy process in operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., & Zioło, M. (2018). Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega, 86, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, K. K. F. (2012). Pairwise opposite matrix and its cognitive prioritization operators: Comparisons with pairwise reciprocal matrix and analytic prioritization operators. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017). A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar