The Mapping of Contingencies in Mental Models Found in Organizations

References

• Agnew, J. L., & Redmon, W. K. (1992). Contingency specifying stimuli: The role of “rules” in organizational behavior management. In T. C. Mawhinney (Ed.), Organizational culture, rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management: Theoretical foundations and implications for research and practice (pp. 6774). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985-1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21, 3–29. doi:10.1300/J075v21n01_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, P., & Parker, S. (2012). Understanding individual compassion in organizations: The role of appraisals and psychological flexibility. Academy of Management Review, 37, 524–546. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K., & Mohammed, S. (2007). Mental models in design teams: A valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign, 3, 5–20. doi:10.1080/15710880601170768
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Schwenk, T., Piasecki, M., Smith, G. S., Reimer, D., Jacobs, N., … Houmanfar, R. A. (2015). Cultural change in a medical school: A data-driven management of entropy. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35, 95–122. doi:10.1080/01608061.2015.1035826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcazar, F., Hopkins, B. L., & Suarez, Y. (1985). A critical objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7, 65–89. doi:10.1300/J075v07n03_05
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders’ commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, W. M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior, and culture. New York, NYbk_AQCmts7b: HarperCollins College.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, W. M. (2011). Behaviorism, private events, and the molar view of behavior. Behavior Analyst, 34, 185–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. F., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. V., Richerson, P. J., & McElreath, R. (2009). Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 17671–17674. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903232106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, T. C. (1995). On the evolution of altruistic ethical rules for siblings. American Economic Review, 85, 58–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960–970. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieri, J. (1955). Cognitive complexity-simplicity and predictive behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(2), 263–268. doi:10.1037/h0043308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology, 34, 227–254. doi:10.1086/204166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm, C. (2001). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2003). The role of acceptance and job control in mental health, job satisfaction, and work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1057–1067. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, F. W., & Flaxman, P. E. (2006). The ability of psychological flexibility and job control to predict learning, job performance, and mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26(12), 113–130. doi:10.1300/J075v26n01_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2006). Psychological flexibility, ACT, and organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26(12), 25–54. doi:10.1300/J075v26n01_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P., & Pritchard, R. D. (1976). Cognitive complexity-simplicity and predictive behavior. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 63130). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (Eds.). (1998). Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Convertino, G., & Ganoe, C. H. (2006). Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interacting With Computers, 18, 21–36. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. London, UK: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Creel, R. (1980). Radical epiphenomenalism: B.F. Skinner’s account of private events. Behaviorism, 8, 31–53.
   Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L. (2003). Formal group decision-making: A social-cognitive approach. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Asociatia de Stiinte Cognitive din Romania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L. (2006). Emergent states in virtual teams: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 21, 249–261. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53. doi:10.1037/a0017328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. P. J. (2006). System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 576–589. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(4), 552–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. (1981). Social episodes and group milieu: A study in social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 77–87. doi:10.1111/bjso.1981.20.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1103–1113. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. K. (2012). Inequality and instability: A study of the world economy just before the great crisis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex. New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Poole, P. P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 449–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goltz, S. M. (2000). Escalation research: Providing new frontiers for applying behavior analysis to organizational behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goltz, S. M. (2011). Spiritual power: The internal, renewable social power source. Journal of Management Spirituality and Religion, 8, 341–363. doi:10.1080/14766086.2011.630171
   Google Scholar
• Goltz, S. M., & Poonamallee, L. C. (2014). Beyond egocentricity: Themes in tribal and transcendent mental models of profits and nonprofits (Unpublished manuscript). Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, C., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2000). The impact of collectivism and in-group/out-group membership on the evaluation generosity of team members. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1097–1106. doi:10.2307/1556338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowdy, J., Dollimore, D., Witt, U., & Wilson, D. S. (2013). Economic cosmology and the evolutionary challenge. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 90, 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 389435). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 663–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Contextual behavioral science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2012.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Haas, J. R., & Greenway, D. E. (1986). Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule-governed from schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46(2), 137–147. doi:10.1901/jeab.1986.046-137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45(3), 237–256. doi:10.1901/jeab.1986.45-237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Bunting, K., Herbst, S., Bond, F. W., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2006). Expanding the scope of organizational behavior management: Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of complex human behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 1–23. doi:10.1300/J075v26n01_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Melancon, S. M. (1989). Avoiding and altering rule control as a strategy of clinical treatment. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 359385). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., Plumb-Vilardaga, J., Villatte, J. L., & Pistorello, J. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: Examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behavior Therapy, 44, 180–198. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2009.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes, and outcomes. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80022-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., & Plumb, J. C. (2007). Mindfulness from the bottom up: Providing an inductive framework for understanding mindfulness processes and their application to human suffering. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 242–248. doi:10.1080/10478400701598314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic account of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 283–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. A., & Houmanfar, R. (2009). Psychological approaches to values in organizations and organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29, 47–68. doi:10.1080/01608060802714210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Houmanfar, R., & Rodrigues, N. (2006). The metacontingency and the behavior contingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 15(1), 13–30. doi:10.5210/bsi.v15i1.342
   Google Scholar
• Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., & Smith, G. S. (2009). Role of communication networks in behavioral systems analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29, 257–275. doi:10.1080/01608060903092102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 78–103. doi:10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3065
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, S. (2014). Associative concept learning, stimulus equivalence, and relational frame theory: Working out the similarities and differences between human and non-human behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 156–160. doi:10.1002/jeab.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2001). Telling what we know: Describing inner experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 400–403. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01724-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P., & Delehanty, H. (1995). Sacred hoops: Spiritual lessons of a hardwood warrior. New York, NY: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J. (2000). Problem solving about complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1421). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. (1983). Transaction costs, property rights, and organisational culture: An exchange perspective. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 28, 454–467. doi:10.2307/2392252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32, 137–155. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.23463924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kennett, D. J., Winterhalder, B., Bartruff, J., & Erlandson, J. M. (2009). An ecological model for the emergence of institutionalized social hierarchies on California’s Northern Channel Islands. In S. Shennan (Ed.), Pattern and process in cultural evolution (pp. 297314). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1984). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In L. Kohlberg (Ed.), Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (pp. 170–205). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Komaki, J. L. (1986). Applied behavior analysis and organizational behavior: Reciprocal influence of the two fields. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 297–334). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp. 240–292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leigland, S. (2003). Private events and the language of the mental: Comments on Moore. Behavior and Philosophy, 31, 159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M., & Wholey, D. R. (2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 135–144. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2), 159–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, B.-C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403–418. doi:10.1002/job.387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., Stamps, J., & Lipnack, J. (2004). Can absence make a team grow stronger? Harvard Business Review, 82, 131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malott, M. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15(1), 31–56. doi:10.5210/bsi.v15i1.344
   Google Scholar
• Malott, R. W., Shimamune, S., & Malott, M. E. (1992). Rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management: An analysis of interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 103–116. doi:10.1300/J075v12n02_09
   Google Scholar
• Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1981). Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, S. C., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 3–13. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattaini, M. A. (2007). Editorial: Technical language in cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 16, 1–4. doi:10.5210/bsi.v16i1.1811
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2013). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 95–105. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A metaanalytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, N. B., Dingsoyr, T., & Dyba, T. (2010). A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a scrum project. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 480–491. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910. doi:10.1177/0149206309356804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, C., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2014). “Just think about it”? Cognitive complexity and moral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 138–149. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2001). On psychological terms that appeal to the mental. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 167–186.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, A. (1977). Spinoza and ecology. Philosophia, 1, 45–54. doi:10.1007/BF02379991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, A. (2005). The basics of deep ecology. The Trumpeter, 21, 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D. (2005). The neo-Kohlbergian tradition and beyond: Schemas, expertise and character. In G. Carlo & C. Edwards (Eds.), Moral motivation through the life span (Vol. 51, pp. 119163). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira, C. V. (2009). Seleção de diferentes culturantes no dilema do prisioneiro: efeito da interação entre a consequência cultural, escolhas simultâneas ou sequenciais e a comunicação [Selection of different culturants in the Prisoner’s Dilemma: Effect of an interaction among cultural consequences, simultaneous or sequential choices, and communication.] ( Master’s thesis, Universidad de Brasilia). Retrieved from http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/7753
   Google Scholar
• O’Donahue, W., & Ferguson, K. (2001). The psychology of B.F. Skinner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poonamallee, L. (2011, August). Compassion to strangers: Examining the dynamics of public compassion in the case of the Asian tsunami in Indian. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, San Antonio, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Poonamallee, L., & Goltz, S. (2014). Beyond social exchange theory: An integrative look at transcendent mental models for engagement. Integral Review, 10(1), 63–90.
   Google Scholar
• Poppen, R. L. (1989). Some clinical implications of rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 325–257). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosales, R., Rehfeldt, R., & Lovett, S. (2011). Effects of multiple exemplar training on the emergence of derived relations in preschool children learning a second language. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 61–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (2001). The idiosyncratic deal: Flexibility versus fairness? Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 260–273. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00032-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampaio, A. A., Araujo, L. A., Goncalo, M. E., Ferraz, J. C., Filho, A. P., Brito, I. S., & Calado, J. I. (2013). Exploring the role of verbal behavior in a new experimental task for the study of metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 87–101. doi:10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4180
   Google Scholar
• Schlinger, H. D. (1993). Separating discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 9–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1981, July 31). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504. doi:10.1126/science.7244649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1990). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY: Bantam Books. (Original work published 1971)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. S., Houmanfar, R., & Louis, S. J. (2011). The participatory role of verbal behavior in an elaborated account of metacontingency: From conceptualization to investigation. Behavior and Social Issues, 20, 122–146.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Bond, F. W., & Hayes, S. C. (2006). Relational frame theory and industrial/organizational psychology. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 55–90. doi:10.1300/J075v26n01_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiner, M. C., Barkai, R., & Gopher, A. (2002). Cooperative hunting and meat sharing. Journal of Archeological Research, 10, 1–63. doi:10.1023/A:1014588307174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torneke, N., Luciano, C., & Valdivia Salas, S. (2008). Rule-governed behavior and psychological problems. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8, 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., Healey, A. N., Darzi, S. A., & Vincent, C. (2006). Teamwork in the operating theatre: Cohesion or confusion? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 182–189. doi:10.1111/jep.2006.12.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A. (2013). Exploring macrocontingencies and metacontingencies: Experimental and non-experimental contributions. Suma Psicológica, 20(1), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Vichi, C., Andery, M. A., & Glenn, S. S. (2009). A metacontingency experiment: The effects of contingent consequences on patterns of interlocking contingencies of reinforcement. Behavior and Social Issues, 18, 41–57. doi:10.5210/bsi.v18i1.2292
   Google Scholar
• Waller, M. J., Gupta, N., & Giambatista, R. C. (2004). Effects of adaptive behaviors and shared mental models on control crew performance. Management Science, 50, 1534–1544. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherly, N. L., & Malott, R. W. (2008). An analysis of organizational behavior management research in terms of the three-contingency model of performance management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 28(4), 260–285. doi:10.1080/01608060802454643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 81–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. (2014). Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 395–416. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13001593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. (2013). Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S21–S32. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348. doi:10.1086/522809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, U., & Schwesinger, G. (2013). Phylogenetic footprints in organizational behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S33–S44. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111(470), 295–321. doi:10.1111/ecoj.2001.111.issue-470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar