Behavioral Perspectives on Variability in Human Behavior as Part of Process Safety

References

• Agnew, J. L., & Redmon, W. K. (1993). Contingency specify stimuli: The role of “rules” in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 67–76. doi:10.1300/J075v12n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Aoyama, K., & McSweeney, F. K. (2001). Habituation contributes to within- session changes in free wheel running. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 289–302. doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkan, R., Zohar, D., & Erev, I. (1998). Accidents and decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of four models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(2), 118–144. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S., Dymond, S., & O’Hora, D. (2001). Multiple stimulus relations and the transformation of stimulus functions. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 51–72). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, G., & Erev, I. (2003). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 215–233. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely, E., & Schlinger, H. (1987). Rules: Function-altering contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10(2), 183–187. doi:10.1007/BF03392428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogard, K., Ludwig, T. D., Staats, C., & Kretschmer, D. (2015). An industry’s call to understand the contingencies involved in process safety: Normalization of deviance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 70–80. doi:10.1080/01608061.2015.1031429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M., Huffstetler, S., & McGuire, J. T. (2009). Effort discounting in human nucleus accumbens. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 16–27. doi:10.3758/CABN.9.1.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choice. (1889). Oxford English dictionary online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. M. (2006). Exploratory analyses of the effects of managerial support and feedback consequences on behavioral safety maintenance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26(3), 1–41. doi:10.1300/J075v26n03_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, A. C., & Bailey, J. S. (2015). ‬Performance management: Changing behavior that drives organizational effectiveness‬. Atlanta, GA: Performance Management Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, T. L., & Benoit, S. C. (1998). Learning and eating. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Learning and behavior therapy (pp. 498–517). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Decision. (2015). Oxford English dictionary online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deepwater Horizon Study Group. (2011). Investigation of the Macondo well blowout disaster. Retrieved from http://ccrm.berkeley.edu/pdfs_papers/bea_pdfs/dhsgfinalreport-march2011-tag.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellard, C. G. (1996). Laboratory studies of antipredator behavior in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): Factors affecting response attenuation with repeated presentations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 155–163. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.110.2.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erev, I. (1998). Signal detection by human observers: A cutoff reinforcement learning model of categorization decisions under uncertainty. Psychological Review, 105, 280–298. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erev, I., Gopher, D., Itkin, R., & Greenshpan, Y. (1995). Toward a generalization of a signal detection theory to N person games: The example of two person safety problem. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 360–375. doi:10.1006/jmps.1995.1034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaudas, X., Winne, C. T., & Fedewa, L. A. (2006). Ontogeny of anti-predator behavioral habituation in cottonmouths (Agkistrodon piscivorus). Ethology, 112, 608–615. doi:10.1111/eth.2006.112.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 169–792. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. L., Bradshaw, J. W. S., & Robinson, I. H. (2002). Object play in adult domestic cats: The roles of habituation and disinhibition. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 79, 263–271. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00153-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1943). Habituatory response decrement in the intact organism. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 385–422. doi:10.1037/h0053918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemble, E. D., & Bolwahnn, B. L. (1997). Immediate and long-term effects of novel odors on risk assessment in mice. Physiology & Behavior, 61, 543–549. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00499-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, K., Miller, S. A., & Alavosius, M. P. (2016). A behavioral interpretation of situation awareness: Prospects for Organizational Behavior Management. Journal Of Organizational Behavior Management, 36, 301–321. doi:10.1080/01608061.2016.1236056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R. (1995). Information search during an election campaign: Introducing a process-tracing methodology for political scientists. In M. Lodge, & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951–971. doi:10.2307/2669334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, A. P., Larsen, J. T., & Kahneman, D. (2010). Comparing gains and losses. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1438–1445. doi:10.1177/0956797610381504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney, F. K. (2004). Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: Satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 171–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney, F. K., & Swindell, S. (1999). Behavioral economics and within-session changes in responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 355–371. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.72-355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney, F. K., & Swindell, S. (2002). Common processes may contribute to extinction and habituation. The Journal of General Psychology, 129, 364–400. doi:10.1080/00221300209602103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, A., Geva, N., Redd, S., & Carnes, A. (1997). The effect of dynamic and static choice sets on political decision making: An analysis using the decision board platform. The American Political Science Review, 91(3), 553–566. doi:10.2307/2952074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesse, R. M. (2005). Natural selection and regulation of defenses: A signal detection analysis of the smoke detector principle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 88–105. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2000). Process safety management; OSHA 3132 (reprinted). Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3132.html
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, D. P. (2004). What voters do: Information search during election campaigns. Political Psychology, 25(4), 595–610. doi:10.1111/pops.2004.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, D. P., & Lau, R. R. (2013). Behavioral decision-making. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson, S. O., Taylor, M. A., & Wirth, O. (2013). Discounting the value of safety: Effects of perceived risk and effort. Journal of Safety Research, 46, 127–134. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2013.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar