A Systematic Review of Research Evaluating the Use of Preference Assessment Methodology in the Workplace

References

• Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985-1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(1), 3–29. doi:10.1300/J075v21n01_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojak, S. L., & Carr, J. E. (1999). On the displacement of leisure items by food during multiple-stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(4), 515–518. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, L. G., Hardesty, S. L., Sigurdsson, S. O., McIvor, M., Orchowitz, P. M., Wagner, L. L., & Hagopian, L. P. (2019). Utilizing group-based contingencies to increase hand washing in a large human service setting. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 600–611. doi:10.1007/s40617-018-00328-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodhead, M. T., Durán, L., & Bloom, S. E. (2014). Cultural and linguistic diversity in recent verbal behavior research on individuals with disabilities: A review and implications for research and practice. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30(1), 75–86. doi:10.1007/s40616-014-0009-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buckley, J., Fountain, J., Meuse, S., Whelan, C., Maguire, H., Harper, J. M., & Luiselli, J. K. (2020). Performance improvement of care providers in a child services setting: Effects of an incentive-based negative reinforcement intervention on data recording. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 125–133. doi:10.1080/07317107.2020.1738733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, A. C. (1989). Performance management: Improving quality productivity through positive reinforcement (3rd ed.). Tucker: GA, Performance Management Publications.
   Google Scholar
• DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519–533. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 491–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, R. B., & Karsten, A. M. (2012). Assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities: A survey of current practices. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(2), 37–48. doi:10.1007/BF03391822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., Passante, S., & Canipe, V. (2008). *Changing less-preferred duties to more-preferred: A potential strategy for improving supervisor work enjoyment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 28(2), 90–109. doi:10.1080/01608060802100899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagopian, L. P., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2004). Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 28(5), 668–677. doi:10.1177/0145445503459836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, P. H., Iwata, B. A., & Roscoe, E. M. (2006). Some determinants of changes in preference over time. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(2), 189–202. doi:10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinicke, M. R., Carr, J. E., & Copsey, C. J. (2019). Assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities using alternative stimulus modalities: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(3), 847–869. doi:10.1002/jaba.565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. H., St. Peter, C. C., & Ruckle, M. M. (2020). Reporting of demographic variables in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1304–1315. doi:10.1002/jaba.722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A., Wallace, L., Ehrhardt, K. E., & Poling, A. (2017). Reporting participant characteristics in intervention articles published in five behavior-analytic journals, 2013–2015. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(1), 84–91. doi:10.1037/bar0000071
   Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16(2), 191–198. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, T. P. R. I. S. M. A. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000095. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. D., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., Campisano, N., Lacourse, K., & Azulay, R. L. (2012). *Assessing and increasing staff preference for job tasks using concurrent-chains schedules and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 32(3), 253–262. doi:10.1080/01608061.2012.698121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D. H., & Parsons, M. B. (1995). *Comparing choice and questionnaire measures of the acceptability of a staff training procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(1), 95–96. doi:org10.1901/jaba.1995.28-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouse, M. C., Carroll-Hernandez, T. A., Sherman, J. A., & Sheldon, J. B. (2004). Turning over turnover: The evaluation of a staff scheduling system in a community-based program for adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23(2–3), 45–63. doi:10.1300/J075v23n02_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullis, C. A., Cannella-Malone, H. I., Basbigill, A. R., Yeager, A., Fleming, C. V., Payne, D., & Wu, P. (2011). Review of the choice and preference assessment literature for individuals with severe to profound disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(4), 576–595. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24232368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldvogel, J. M., & Dixon, M. R. (2008). *Exploring the utility of preference assessments in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 28(1), 76–87. doi:10.1080/01608060802006831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, D. A., Harris, C., Casella, S., Wine, B., & Postma, N. (2011). *Further evaluation of the accuracy of managerial prediction of employee preference. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 31(2), 130–139. doi:10.1080/01608061.2011.569202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, D. A., Rost, K., & McMahon, M. (2007). *The accuracy of managerial prediction of employee preference. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 27(2), 1–14. doi:10.1300/J075v27n02_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, D. A., Therrien, K., & Wine, B. (2006). *A comparison between survey and verbal choice methods of identifying potential reinforcers among employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 25(4), 1–13. doi:10.1300/J075v25n04_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, D. A., Wilson, P., Ellsworth, C., & Heering, P. W. (2003). A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessment methods in adults with schizophrenia. Behavioral Interventions, 18(3), 191–198. doi:10.1002/bin.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wine, B., & Axelrod, S. (2014). *The effects of progressively thinning high-preference item delivery on responding in employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 34(4), 291–299. doi:10.1080/01608061.2014.973629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wine, B., Gilroy, S., & Hantula, D. A. (2012). *Temporal (in)stability of employee preferences for rewards. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 32(1), 58–64. doi:10.1080/01608061.2012.646854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wine, B., Gugliemella, C., & Axelrod, S. (2013). *An examination of generalized-conditioned reinforcers in stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 33(4), 244–251. doi:10.1080/01608061.2013.843433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wine, B., Kelley, D. P., III, & Wilder, D. A. (2014a). *An initial assessment of effective preference assessment intervals among employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 34(3), 188–195. doi:10.1080/01608061.2014.944747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wine, B., Reis, M., & Hantula, D. (2014b). *An evaluation of stimulus preference assessment methodology in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 34(1), 7–15. doi:10.1080/01608061.2013.873379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wine, B., & Wilder, D. A. (2009). The effects of varied versus constant high-, medium-, and low-preference stimuli on performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 321–326. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar