Examining Rates of Engagement over Time with Court-Ordered Men in a Domestic Abuse Treatment Program

References

• Adams, D. (2003). Certified batterer intervention programs: History, philosophies, techniques, innovations and challenges. Clinics in Family Practice, 5(1), 159–176. doi:10.1016/S1522-5720(02)00079-X
   Google Scholar
• Asay, T., & Lambert, M. (1999). The empirical case for the common factors. In M. Hubbles, B. Duncan, & S. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 23–55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, J. C., & Steiner, R. (1999, March). The relationship between treatment, incarceration, and recidivism of battering: A program evaluation of Seattle’s coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(1), 46–59. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.1.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begun, A. L., Shelley, G., Strodthoff, T., & Short, L. (2001). Nonconventional approaches for intervention in cases of spouse/partner abuse. In R. A. Geffner & A. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Domestic violence offenders: Current interventions, research and implications for policies and standards (pp. 105–127). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cadsky, O., Hanson, R. K., Crawford, M., & Lalonde, C. (1996). Attrition from a male batterer treatment program: Client-treatment congruence and lifestyle instability. Violence and Victims, 11(1), 51–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chovanec, M. (2014). Group member engagement in domestic abuse treatment: A mixed-methods study of two urban programs. In Proceedings, XXXIII International Symposium on Social Work with Groups, June, 2011. London, UK: Whiting & Birch Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chovanec, M. G. (2012). Examining engagement of men in a domestic abuse program from three perspectives: An exploratory multi-method study. Social Work with Groups, 35(4), 362–378. doi:10.1080/01609513.2012.669351
   Google Scholar
• Feder, L., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can court affect abusers’ behavior? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 239–262. doi:10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0
   Google Scholar
• Gondolf, E. W. (1988). The effects of batterer counseling on shelter outcome. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3(3), 275–289. doi:10.1177/088626088003003002
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, B., Werner, T., Shipway, L., & Turinetti, G. J. (2006). Recidivism among spousal abusers, predictions and program evaluation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(6), 703–716. doi:10.1177/0886260506287310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, E., Bowen, E., Brown, S., & Howat, D. (2014). Offender engagement in group programs and associations with offender characteristics and treatment factors: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 102–121. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, L. M., & Wormith, J. S. (2010). Variables associated with attrition from domestic violence treatment programs targeting male batterers: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1086–1113. doi:10.1177/0093854810376815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistenmacher, B. R., & Weiss, R. L. (2008). Motivational interviewing as a mechanism for change in men who batter: A randomized controlled study. Violence and Victims, 23(5), 558–570. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.5.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., & Macgowan, M. J. (2004). Engagement, denial, and treatment progress among sex offenders in group therapy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(1), 49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, D. A., Gelles, R. J., & Velicer, W. F. (2000). Development and validation of a stages of change measure for men in batterer treatment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(2), 175–199. doi:10.1023/A:1005446025201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, K. G. (2006). Involuntary clients are different: Strategies for group engagement using individual theories in synergy with group development theories. Groupwork, 16(2), 61–84. doi:10.1921/0951824X.16.2.61
   Google Scholar
• Macgowan, M. J. (2006a). The Group Engagement Measure: A review of its conceptual and empirical properties. Journal of Group in Addiction and Recovery, 1(2), 33–52. doi:10.1300/J384v01n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Macgowan, M. (2006b). Measuring and increasing engagement in substance abuse treatment groups: Advancing evidence-based group work. Journal of Groups in Addiction and Recovery, 1(2), 53–67. doi:10.1300/J384v01n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Macgowan, M. J. (1997). A measure of engagement for social group work: The Groupwork Engagement Measure (GEM). Journal of Social Service Research, 23(2), 17–37. doi:10.1300/J079v23n02_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgowan, M. J. (2000). Evaluation of a measure of engagement for group work. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(3), 348–361. Retrieved from http://rsw.sagepub.com/content/10/3/348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. M., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing, preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musser, P. H., Semiatin, J. N., Taft, C. T., & Murphy, C. M. (2008). Motivational interviewing as a pregroup intervention for partner-violent men. Violence and Victims, 23(5), 539–557. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.5.539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, J., Norcross, J., & DiClemente, C. (1994). Changing for good. New York, NY: Avon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, T. N., Jennings, W. G., Tomsich, E. A., & Gover, A. R. (2013). A longitudinal examination of offending and specialization among a sample of Massachusetts domestic violence offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(3), 643–663. doi:10.1177/0886260512455519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney, R., & Chovanec, M. (2004). Group work in involuntary settings. In C. D. Garvin, M. J. Galinsky, & L. M. Gutierrez (Eds.), Handbook of social work with groups (pp. 212–226). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. (2006). Statistics for evidence-based practice and evaluation. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Sartin, R. M., Hansen, D. J., & Huss, M. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 425–440. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K. L. (2004, February). Stage of change as a predictor of attrition among men in a batterer treatment program. Journal of Family Violence, 19(1), 37–47. doi:10.1023/B:JOFV.0000011581.01231.1e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvergleid, C. S., & Mankowski, E. S. (2006). How batterer intervention programs work. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(1), 139–159. doi:10.1177/0886260505282103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetley, A., Jinks, M., Huband, N., & Howells, K. (2011). A systematic review of therapeutic engagement in psychosocial and psychological treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(9), 927–941. doi:10.1002/jclp.20811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar