References
- Bird, S., E. Klein, and E. Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python – Analyzing text with the Natural Language Toolkit. www.nltk.org/book.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation. Cryptanalysts: Breaking codes to stop crime. Last modified March 21, 2011. Accessed December 11, 2019. https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/breaking-codes-to-stop-crime-part-1.
- Kahn, D. 1996. The codebreakers: The comprehensive history of secret communication from ancient times to the Internet. New York: Scribner.
- Mosteller, F., and D. L. Wallace. 1963. Inference in an authorship problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58 (302):275–309. doi:10.2307/2283270.
- Peng, R. D., and N. W. Hengartner. 2002. Quantitative analysis of literary styles. The American Statistician 56 (3):175–85. doi:10.1198/000313002100.
- Sarndal, C. 1967. On deciding cases of disputed authorship. (Applied Statistics) 16 (3):251–68. doi:10.2307/2985921.
- Savoy, J. 2016. Estimating the probability of authorship attribution. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (6):1462–72. doi:10.1002/asi.23455.
- Stamatatos, E. 2009. A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (3):538–56. doi:10.1002/asi.21001.
- Wrixton, F. 1998. Codes, ciphers, and other cryptic and clandestine communication: Making and breaking secret messages from hieroglyphics to the Internet. New York: Black Dog & Levanthal.