References
- Aaronson, N., Alonso, J., Burnam, A., Lohr, K. N., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E., & Stein, R. E. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015291021312
- American Psychological Association. (2021). Depression assessment instruments. Retrieved August 2021, from https://www.apa.org/depression-guideline/assessment
- Baumann, N. (2016). How to use the medical subject headings (MeSH). International Journal of Clinical Practice, 70(2), 171–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12767
- Briscoe, S., Bethel, A., & Rogers, M. (2020). Conduct and reporting of citation searching in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1355
- Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S. E., Ellis, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Ryan, R., Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., & Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ, 368, l6890 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
- Caulley, L., Catalá-López, F., Whelan, J., Khoury, M., Ferraro, J., Cheng, W., Husereau, D., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2020). Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 122, 87–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.006
- Cleary, M., Hunt, G. E., & Horsfall, J. (2009). Conducting efficient literature searches. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 47(11), 34–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20090930-03
- Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). (2021). COSMIN tools. Retrieved June 20, 2021, from https://www.cosmin.nl/tools/pubmed-search-filters/
- Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251.
- Francis, D. O., McPheeters, M. L., Noud, M., Penson, D. F., & Feurer, I. D. (2016). Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 129–111.
- Jenkins, M. (2004). Evaluation of methodological search filters-A review. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 21(3), 148–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2004.00511.x
- Li, H., Ding, N., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., & Wen, D. (2017). Assessing medical professionalism: A systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties. PLOS One, 12(5), e0177321https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177321
- Lisy, K., & Porritt, K. (2016). Narrative synthesis: Considerations and challenges. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 14(4), 201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XEB.0000511348.97198.8c
- Lorente, S., Viladrich, C., Vives, J., & Losilla, J. M. (2020). Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: A meta-review. BMJ Open, 10(8), e036038https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036038
- McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 75, 40–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
- Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2006). Protocol of the COSMIN study: Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 2 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-2
- Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
- Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Riphagen, I., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2009). Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9451-9
- O’Connor, M., Casey, L., & Clough, B. (2014). Measuring mental health literacy-a review of scale-based measures. Journal of Mental Health, 23(4), 197–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2014.910646
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Prinsen, C. A., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., De Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147–1157.
- Rosenkoetter, U., & Tate, R. L. (2018). Assessing features of psychometric assessment instruments: A comparison of the COSMIN checklist with other critical appraisal tools. Brain Impairment, 19(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2017.29
- Sampson, M., McGowan, J., Cogo, E., Grimshaw, J., Moher, D., & Lefebvre, C. (2009). An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(9), 944–952. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.012
- Stephenson, M., Riitano, D., Wilson, S., Leonardi-Bee, J., Mabire, C., Cooper, K. A. E., & Munn, Z. (2020). Chapter 12: Systematic reviews of measurement properties. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
- Stewart, L., Moher, D., & Shekelle, P. (2012). Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense. Systematic Reviews, 1, 7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-7
- Straus, S., & Moher, D. (2010). Registering systematic reviews. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182(1), 13–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081849
- Tawfik, G. M., Giang, H. T. N., Ghozy, S., Altibi, A. M., Kandil, H., Le, H.-H., Eid, P. S., Radwan, I., Makram, O. M., Hien, T. T. T., Sherif, M., Hossain, A.-S., Thang, T. L. L., Puljak, L., Salem, H., Numair, T., Moji, K., & Huy, N. T. (2020). Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: A survey of global researchers. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01094-9
- Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115–1123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5
- Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A., Ricci Garotti, M. G., Suman, A., de Vet, H. C., & Mokkink, L. B. (2016). The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 25(4), 767–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1122-4
- Thapa, D. K., Visentin, D. C., Hunt, G. E., Watson, R., & Cleary, M. (2020). Being honest with causal language in writing for publication. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(6), 1285–1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14311
- Waffenschmidt, S., Knelangen, M., Sieben, W., Bühn, S., & Pieper, D. (2019). Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: A methodological systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0782-0