Carbonaceous materials modified catalysts for simultaneous SO₂/NO_x removal from flue gas: A review

References

• Bwatanglang, I. B.; Faruq, M.; Gupta, A. K.; Yusof, N. A. Algae-Derived Biomass for Sustainable and Renewable Biofuel Production in Agricultural Biomass Based Potential Materials. In Agricultural Biomass Based Potential Materials; Khalid, R.H., Mohammad, J., Othman, Y.A., Eds.; Springer: Switzerland, 2015, pp 341–373.
   Google Scholar
• Kampa, M.; Castanas, E. Human Health Effects of Air Pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 2, 362–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalska, K.; Miller, J. S.; Ledakowicz, S. Trends in NOx Abatement: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 19, 3976–3989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angel, M.; Pasidis, I.; Viladecans, E. The Fundamental Law of Highway Congestion and Air Pollution in Europe’s Cities. J. Regi. Sci. 2017, 2, 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.; Bisson, T. M.; Yang, H.; Xu, Z. Recent Developments in Novel Sorbents for Flue Gas Clean Up. Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 10, 1175–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhansu, M. K.; Karmakar, P.; Chatterjee, P. K. Review on the Fuel Gas Cleaning Technologies in Gasification Process. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 2, 689–702.
   Google Scholar
• Matralis, H.; Fiasse, S.; Castillo, R.; Bastians, P.; Ruwet, M. A. Way to Inhibit SO2 Poisoning of SCR Catalysts by Fine Tuning of the Composition and the Preparation Method of the Support. Catal. Tod. 1993, 17, 141–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y.; Zwolińska, E.; Chmielewski, A. G. Abatement Technologies for High Concentration of NOx and SO2 Removal from Exhaust Gases: A Review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 29, 5467–5487.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, F.; Rownaghi, A.; Monjezi, S.; Lively, R. P.; Jones, C. W. SOx/NOx Removal from Flue Gas Streams by Solid Adsorbents: A Review of Current Challenges and Future Directions. Energy Fuels. 2015, 29, 5467–5486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Guo, S.; Huang, Z.; Xiao, Y. SO2 and NO Removal from Flue Gas over V2O5/AC at Lower Temperatures- Role of V2O5 on SO2 Removal. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89, 242–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. A.; Alexis, N.; Barnes, C. Health Effects of Air Pollution. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 5, 1116–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irfan, M. F.; Goo, J. H.; Kim, S. D. Co3O4 Based Catalysts for NO Oxidation and NOx Reduction in Fast SCR Process. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 78, 267–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lázaro, M. J.; Ascaso, S.; Pérez-Rodríguez, S. Carbon-Based Catalysts: Synthesis and Applications. Comptes. Rendus. Chim. 2015, 11, 1229–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z.; Tang, N.; Xiao, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H. MnOx/TiO2 Composite Nanoxides Synthesized by Deposition-Precipitation Method as a Superior Catalyst for NO Oxidation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 1, 143–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarnieri, M.; Balmes, J. R. Outdoor Air Pollution and Asthma. Lancet. 2014, 9928, 1581–1592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, M. P.; Kaur, B. J.; Sharma, A.; Mishra, S. Seasonal Variation of Air Pollutants of Delhi and Its Health Effects. NeBio. 2013, 4, 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rokni, E.; Panahi, A.; Ren, X.; Levendis, Y. A. Curtailing the Generation of Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide Emissions by Blending and Oxy-Combustion of Coals. Fuel. 2016, 181, 772–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardencki, W. Problems with the Determination of Environmental Sulphur Compounds. J. Chromatogr. 1998, 513, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghunath, C. V.; Mondal, M. K. Experimental Scale Multi Component Absorption of SO2 and NO by NH3/NaClO Scrubbing. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 314, 537–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera, P.; Hegde, M. S. NO Reduction Over Noble Metal Ionic Catalysts. Catal. Surv. From Asia. 2011, 150, 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignon, J.; Hameed, S. Global Emissions of Nitrogen and Sulfur Oxides from 1860 to 1980. JAPCA. 1989, 2, 180–186.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, S. K.; Khoder, M. I. Chemical Characteristics of Atmospheric PM2.5 Loads during Air Pollution Episodes in Giza, Egypt. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 150, 346–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S.; Wu, X.; Weng, D.; Ran, R. Ceria-Based Catalysts for Soot Oxidation: A Review. J. Rare Earths. 2015, 6, 567–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artun, G. K.; Polat, N.; Yay, O. D.; Üzmez, O. O.; Ari, A. An Integrative Approach for Determination of Air Pollution and Its Health Effetcs in a Coal Fired Power Plant Area by Passive Sampling. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 150, 331–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, F. A.; Aziz, M. A.; Saidur, R.; Bakar, W. Pollution to Solution: Capture and Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and Its Utilization as a Renewable Energy Source for a Sustainable Future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 7, 112–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, P.; Li, Y.; Hu, Z.; Lou, D. Investigation of Nitrogen Oxides, Particle Number, and Size Distribution on a Light-Duty Diesel Car with B10 and G10 Fuels. Fuel. 2017, 197, 373–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neathery, J. K.; Rubel, M.; Stencel, J. M. Uptake of NOx by Activated Carbons: Bench-Scale and Pilot-Plant Testing. Carbon. 1997, 9, 1321–1327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignon, J. NOx and SOx Emissions from Fossil Fuels: A Global Distribution. Atmos. Environ. Part A. Gen. Top. 1992, 6, 1157–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juntgen, H.; Richter, E.; Kuhl, H. Catalytic Activity of Carbon Catalysts Reaction of NO, with NH3. Fuels. 1988, 67, 775–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.; Chiang, K.; Burke, N. Porous Carbon-Supported Catalysts for Energy and Environmental Applications: A Short Review. Catal. Tod. 2011, 1, 197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdedayem, A.; Guiza, M.; Ouederni, A. Copper Supported on Porous Activated Carbon Obtained by Wetness Impregnation: Effect of Preparation Conditions on the Ozonation Catalyst’s Characteristics. Comptes. Rendus. Chim. 2015, 1, 100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q.; Liu, Z. Carbon Supported Vanadia for Multi-Pollutants Removal from Flue Gas. Fuel. 2013, 4, 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J.; Chang, H.; Ma, L.; Hao, J.; Yang, R. T. Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 over Metal Oxide and Zeolite Catalysts- A Review. Catal. Tod. 2011, 1, 147–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przepiórski, J. Activated Carbon Surfaces in Environmental Remediation. Interface Sci. Technol. 2006, 7, 421–474.
   Google Scholar
• Vergunst, T.; Linders, M. J. G.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J. A. Carbon-Based Monolithic Structures. Catal. Rev. 2001, 3, 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centi, G.; Ciambelli, P.; Perathoner, S.; Russo, P. Environmental Catalysis: Trends and Outlook. Catal. Tod. 2002, 1–4, 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z.; Srinivasan, M. P.; Ni, Y. Novel Activation Process for Preparing Highly Microporous and Mesoporous Activated Carbons Novel Activation Process for Preparing Highly Microporous and Mesoporous Activated Carbons. Carbon. 2015, 39, 877–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujishige, M.; Yoshida, I.; Toya, Y.; Banba, Y. Preparation of Activated Carbon from Bamboo-Cellulose Fiber and Its Use for EDLC Electrode Material. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 2, 1801–1808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meryemoglu, B.; Irmak, S.; Hasanoglu, A. Production of Activated Carbon Materials from Kenaf Biomass to Be Used as Catalyst Support in Aqueous-Phase Reforming Process. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 151, 59–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza-Recobert, M.; Trautwein, G.; Pérez-Cadenas, M.; Alcañiz-Monge, J. Preparation of Binderless Activated Carbon Monoliths from Cocoa Bean Husk. Micro. Mesop. Mater. 2017, 243, 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, A.; Thu, K.; Mitra, S.; El-Sharkawy, I.; Saha, B. B. Study on Biomass Derived Activated Carboation. Int. J. Heat Mass. Transf. 2017, 110, 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botomé, M. L.; Poletto, P.; Junges, J.; Perondi, D.; Dettmer, A.; Godinho, M. Preparation and Characterization of a Metal-Rich Activated Carbon from CCA-Treated Wood for (CO2) Capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 321, 614–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji, K.; Shiraishi, I. Combined Desulfurization, Denitrification and Reduction of Air Toxics Using Activated Coke: Activity of Activated Coke. Fuel. 1997, 6, 549–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orfanoudaki, T.; Skodras, G.; Dolios, I.; Sakellaropoulos, G. P. Production of Carbon Molecular Sieves by Plasma Treated Activated Carbon Fibers. Fuel. 2003, 15–17, 2045–2049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cermakova, L.; Kopecka, I.; Pivokonsky, M.; Janda, L. V. Removal of Cyanobacterial Amino Acids in Water Treatment by Activated Carbon Adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 173, 330–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Cen, K. Physicochemical Properties of Metal-Doped Activated Carbons and Relationship with Their Performance in the Removal of SO2 and NO. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 188, 58–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, B. C.; Lee, C. W.; Lee, Y. S.; Im, J. S. Metal Impregnate on Activated Carbon Fiber for SO2 Gas Removal: Assessment of Pore Structure, Cu Supporter, Breakthrough, and Bed Utilization. Colloids Surfaces Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 509, 73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Reinoso, F.; Sepúlveda-Escribano, A. Porous Carbons in Adsorption and Catalysis. Surf.Interf. Mater. 2005, 36, 309–355.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, E.;. Carbon Catalyst for Pollution Control. Catal. Today. 1990, 7, 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Cheng, X.; Wang, Z.; Ma, C.; Qin, Y. Investigation on Fe-CO Binary Metal Oxides Supported on Activated Semi-Coke for NO Reduction by CO. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 201, 636–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, I.; Bernardo, M.; Silva, I. F. Porous Carbon : A Versatile Material for Catalysis. Catalysis Tod. 2017, 285, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, Y.; Tzanis, L.; Soulard, M.; Patarin, J.; Vierling, M.; Moli, M. Adsorption of SOx by Oxide Materials: A Review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 114, 81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri, S.; Julkapli, N. M. Effect of Hybridization on the Value-Added Activated Carbon Materials. Int. J. Ind. Chem. 2016, 3, 249–264.
   Google Scholar
• Vergunst, T.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J. A. Preparation of Carbon-Coated Monolithic Supports. Carbon. 2002, 40, 1891–1902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghili, F.; Ghoreyshi, A. A.; Rahimpour, A.; Rahimnejad, M. Coating of Mixed-Matrix Membranes with Powdered Activated Carbon for Fouling Control and Treatment of Dairy Effluent. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 107, 528–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangupomu, R. H.; Sattler, M. L.; Ramirez, D. Comparative Study of Carbon Nanotubes and Granular Activated Carbon: Physicochemical Properties and Adsorption Capacities. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 302, 362–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, S.; Ikeda, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Miyoshi, M. N. NO(x) Storage-Reduction Catalyst for Automotive Exhaust with Improved Tolerance against Sulfur Poisoning. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2000, 2–3, 115–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila, P.; Montes, M.; Miró, E. E. Monolithic Reactors for Environmental Applications: A Review on Preparation Technologies. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 109, 11–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomašić, V.; Jović, F. State-Of-The-Art in the Monolithic Catalysts/Reactors. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2006, 311, 112–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergunst, T.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J. A. Monolithic Catalysts Non-Uniform Active Phase Distribution by Impregnation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2001, 2, 179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S.; Bauer, T.; Al-Dahhan, M.; Lehner, P.; Turek, T. Monoliths as Multiphase Reactors: A Review. AIChE J. 2004, 11, 2918–2938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. M.; Gulati, S.; Farrauto, R. J. The Application of Monoliths for Gas Phase Catalytic Reactions. Chem. Eng. J. 2001, 82, 149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhuis, T. A.; Beers, A. E. W.; Vergunst, T.; Hoek, I.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J. Preparation of Monolithic Catalysts. Catal. Rev. 2001, 4, 345–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cybulski, A.; Moulijn, J. A. Monoliths in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 1994, 2, 179–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S.; Rashid, S. A.; Abbasi, A.; Babadi, F. E.; Abdullah, L. C.; Choong, T. S. Y. Effect of Catalyst and Substrate on Growth Characteristics of Carbon Nanofiber onto Honeycomb Monolith. Rev. Mex. Urol. 2016, 59, 440–449.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C. P.; Kraleva, E.; Ehrich, H.; Noronha, F. L. Structured Reactors as an Alternative to Fixed-Bed Reactors: Influence of Catalyst Preparation Methodology on the Partial Oxidation of Ethanol. Catal. Tod. 2016, 273, 12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiotto, M.; Pacella, M.; Perin, G.; Iovino, A. Washcoating Vs. Direct Synthesis of LaCoO3 on Monoliths for Environmental Applications. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 499, 146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simescu-Lazar, F.; Chaieb, T.; Pallier, S.; Veyre, L.; Philippe, R.; Meille, V. Direct Coating of Carbon-Supported Catalysts on Monoliths and Foams-Singular Behaviour of Pd/MWCNT. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 508, 45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz, O.; Velasco, I.; Reyero, I.; Legorburu, G. Effect of the Thermal Conductivity of Metallic Monoliths on Methanol Steam Reforming. Catal. Tod. 2016, 273, 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, F.; Webley, P. Structured Adsorbents in Gas Separation Processes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 3, 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender, S.; Friedrich, H. Monoliths: A Review of the Basics, Preparation Methods and Their Relevance to Oxidation. Catalysts. 2017, 7, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samojeden, B.; Motak, M.; Grzybek, T. The Influence of the Modification of Carbonaceous Materials on Their Catalytic Properties in SCR-NH3. A Short Review. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2015, 10, 1049–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiruvenkatachari, R.; Su, S.; An, H.; Yu, X. Post Combustion CO2 Capture by Carbon Fibre Monolithic Adsorbents. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2009, 5, 438–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meille, V.;. Review on Methods to Deposit Catalysts on Structured Surfaces. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2006, 315, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfe, M.; Kulkarni, K.; Kulkarni, A. Review Article on Industrial Application of Monolith Catalysts. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Stud. 2011, 1, 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fechete, I.; Wang, Y.; Vadrine, J. C. The Past, Present and Future of Heterogeneous Catalysis. Catal. Today. 2012, 189, 2–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, M. T.; Du, P.; Heiszwolf, J. J.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J. A. Mass Transfer Characteristics of Three-Phase Monolith Reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 21–22, 6015–6023.
   Google Scholar
• Nova, I.; Beretta, A.; Groppi, G.; Lietti, L.; Tronconi, E.; Forzatti, P. Monolithic Catalysts for NOx Removal from Stationary Sources. In Structured Catalysts and Reactors, 2nd ed.; Cybulski, A., Moulijn, J. A., Eds.; Taylor and Francis, 2006; pp 171–214.
   Google Scholar
• Vald, T.; Marb, G.; Fuertes, B. Preparation of Microporous Carbon ± Ceramic Cellular Monoliths. Micro. Mesop. Mater. 2001, 43, 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento, L. F.; Serra, O. A. Washcoating of Cordierite Honeycomb with Ceria-Copper Mixed Oxides for Catalytic Diesel Soot Combustion. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2016, 101, 134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. W.; Yoo, B. R. Advanced Metal Oxide (Supported) Catalysts: Synthesis and Applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 6, 3947–3959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidi, N. A.; Yusup, S. An Overview of Activated Carbons Utilization for the Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture. J. CO2 Util. 2016, 13, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. L.; Hameed, B. H. Insight into the Adsorption Kinetics Models for the Removal of Contaminants from Aqueous Solutions. J. Tai. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 74, 25–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo, Y.; Yi, H.; Tang, X. Metal-Modified Active Coke for Simultaneous Removal of SO2 and NOx from Sintering Flue Gas. Energy Fuels. 2015, 29, 377–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Z.; Liu, T.; Zhang, J. Regeneration of Al2O3-Coated Cordierite Supported CuO for Simultaneous SO2 and NO Removal. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2005, 44, 651–657.
   Google Scholar
• García-Bordejé, E.; Pinilla, J. L.; Lázaro, M. J.; Moliner, R.; Fierro, J. L. G. Vanadium Supported on Carbon Coated Honeycomb Monoliths for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO at Low Temperatures: Influence of the Oxidation Pre-Treatment. Carbon. 2006, 3, 407–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyano, A.; Herrera, C.; Larrubia, M. A.; Alemany, L. J.; Moliner, R.; Lázaro, M. J. Vanadium Loaded Carbon-Based Monoliths for the On-Board NO Reduction: Influence of Temperature and Period of the Oxidation Treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 160, 623–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, T. M.; Howes, T.; Bhandari, B. R. Encapsulation of Gases in Powder Solid Matrices and Their Applications: A Review. Powder Technol. 2014, 259, 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halit, E. F.; Sema, Z. B. Effect of Ruthenium Addition on Molybdenum Catalysts for Syngas Production via Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane in a Monolithic Reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2018, 43, 1129–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenjie, Q.; Jingyu, R.; Zhien, Z.; Juntian, N.; Peng, Z.; Lijuan, F.; Bo, H.; Qilai, L. Key Laboratory of low-Grade Methane Combustion Reactivity during the Metal-Metallic Oxide Transformation of Pd-Pt Catalysts: Effect of Oxygen Pressure. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 776–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.; Deng, J.; Xie, S.; Wang, Z.; Dai, H. Catalytic Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds Using Ordered Porous Transition Metal Oxide and Supported Noble Metal Catalysts. Chinese J. Catal. 2016, 8, 1193–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, S.; Chen, J. S.; Lou, X. W.; Zeng, H. C. Mesoporous Co3O4 and CoO Topotactically Transformed from Chrysanthemum-Like Co(CO3) 0.5(OH)0.11H2O and Their Lithium-Storage Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 4, 861–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portela, R.; García-Sánchez, V. E.; Villarroel, M.; Rasmussen, S. B.; Ávila, P. Influence of the Pore Generation Method on the Metal Dispersion and Oxidation Activity of Supported Pt in Monolithic Catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 510, 49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa, M.; Petit, C.; Brillard, A.; Brilhac, J. F. Oxidation of Carbon by CeO2: Effect of the Contact between Carbon and Catalyst Particles. Fuel. 2008, 68, 740–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D.; Cooper, S.; Dodgson, I.; Harrison, B.; Jenkins, J. Carbons as Supports for Precious Metal Catalysts. Catalyst Tod. 1990, 7, 113–137.
   Google Scholar
• Qiao, L.; Swihart, M. T. Solution-Phase Synthesis of Transition Metal Oxide Nanocrystals: Morphologies, Formulae, and Mechanisms. Adv.Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 244, 199–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollier, B. M.; Gómez, L. E.; Boix, A. V.; Miró, E. E. Oxidative Coupling of Methane on Sr/La2O3 Catalysts: Improving the Catalytic Performance Using Cordierite Monoliths and Ceramic Foams as Structured Substrates. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2017, 235, 65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Jie, J. I. A.; Jian-Chun, J.; Kang, S. U.; Chao, C. Oxidation of Formic Acid over Palladium Catalyst Supported on Activated Carbon Derived from Polyaniline and Modified Lignosulfonate Composite. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2017, 45, 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, I. Apparatus and Method for Growth of a Thin Film. United States Patent Patent No.: US 6,511,539 B1, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Trovarelli, A.; De Leitenburg, C.; Boaro, M.; Dolcetti, G. The Utilization of Ceria in Industrial Catalysis. Catal. Today. 1999, 50, 353–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athappan, A.; Sattler, M. L.; Sethupathi, S. Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide over Cerium-Doped Activated Carbons. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2005, 3, 2502–2513.
   Google Scholar
• Sumathi, S.; Bhatia, S.; Lee, K. T.; Mohamed, A. R. Cerium Impregnated Palm Shell Activated Carbon (Ce/Psac) Sorbent for Simultaneous Removal of SO2 and NO-Process Study. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 1, 51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q.; Zhang, P.; Xiong, F.; Wei, Q.; Sheng, J.; Wang, Q. Three-Dimensional Porous V2O5 Hierarchical Octahedrons with Adjustable Pore Architectures for Long-Life Lithium Batteries. Nano. Res. 2015, 2, 481–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. A.;. Environmental Catalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1992, 95, 221–256.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, J.; Ya-Qin, H. O.; Qian-Qian, G. U.; Zhang-Gen, H.; Xiao-Jin, H. A. Using Vanadyl Sulfate to Prepare Carbon-Supported Vanadium Catalyst for Flue Gas Desulfurization. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2013, 41, 1223–1233.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, C. Y.; Rau, J. Y.; Chen, J. C.; Huang, S. T.; Wey, M. Y. Removal of NO and Fly Ash over a Carbon Supported Catalyst: Effects of Fly Ash Concentration and Operating Time. Powder Technol. 2013, 239, 239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.; Xu, J. Structure and Visible Light Luminescence of 3D Flower-Like Co3O4 Hierarchical Microstructures Assembled by Hexagonal Porous Nanoplates. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015, 7, 415–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvim-Ferraz, M. D.; Gaspar, C. M. Catalytic Activity of Active Carbons Impregnated before Activation of Pinewood Sawdust and Nutshells to Be Used on the Control of Atmospheric Emissions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 119, 135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, P.; Long, M.; Bai, X.; Wang, C.; Cai, C.; Fu, J. Monolithic Cobalt-Doped Carbon Aerogel for Efficient Catalytic Activation of Peroxymonosulfate in Water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 332, 195–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piumetti, M.; Bensaid, S.; Andana, T.; Russo, N.; Pirone, R.; Fino, D. Cerium-Copper Oxides Prepared by Solution Combustion Synthesis for Total Oxidation Reactions: From Powder Catalysts to Structured Reactors. Appl. Catal. B, Environ. 2016, 205, 455–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J.; Lu, G.; Guo, Y.; Guo, Y.; Gong, Q. A. Highly Effective Catalyst of Co-CeO2 for the Oxidation of Diesel Soot: The Excellent NO Oxidation Activity and NOx Storage Capacity. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2017, 535, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Q.; Nie, Y.; Yang, R.; Cui, Y.; Hare, D. O.; Wang, Q. Highly Dispersed CuyAlOx Mixed Oxides as Superior Low-Temperature Alkali Metal and SO2 Resistant NH3-SCR Catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2017, 538, 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitsch-Larsen, A.; Degenstein, N. J.; Schmidt, L. D. Effect of Sulfur in Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane over Rh-Ce Coated Foam Monoliths. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 78, 364–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, X.; Liu, Z.; Yang, J. Mo and Co Doped V2O5/AC Catalyst-Sorbents for Flue Gas SO2 Removal and Elemental Sulfur Production. Fuel. 2008, 8–9, 1705–1710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assebban, M.; Tian, Z. Y.; El Kasmi, A.; Bahlawane, N.; Harti, S.; Chafik, T. Catalytic Complete Oxidation of Acetylene and Propene over Clay versus Cordierite Honeycomb Monoliths without and with Chemical Vapor Deposited Cobalt Oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 262, 1252–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzybek, G.; Wójcik, S.; Ciura, K.; Gryboś, J.; Indyka, P. Influence of Preparation Method on Dispersion of Cobalt Spinel over Alumina Extrudates and the Catalyst DeNO2 Activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 44, 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, W. J. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Advanced Ceramic Powders. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 1988, 10, 1673–1678.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas, L.; Masset, F.; Guilhaume, N. Wet Impregnation of Alumina-Washcoated Monoliths: Effect of the Drying Procedure on Ni Distribution and on Autothermal Reforming Activity. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2007, 320, 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X.; Khinast, J. G.; Glasser, B. J. A Parametric Investigation of Impregnation and Drying of Supported Catalysts. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 4517–4530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wey, M. Y.; Fu, C. H.; Tseng, H. H.; Chen, K. H. Catalytic Oxidization of SO2 from Incineration Flue Gas over Bimetallic Cu-Ce Catalysts Supported on Pre-Oxidized Activated Carbon. Fuel. 2003, 82, 2285–2290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boissel, V.; Tahir, S.; Koh, C. A. Catalytic Decomposition of N2O over Monolithic Supported Noble Metal-Transition Metal Oxides. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2006, 64, 234–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo-Jun, D.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, Y. F. Preparation and Performance of V-Wreparation and Performance of V-W/x(Mn-Ce-Ti)/y(Cu-Ce-Ti)/Cordierite Catalyst by Impregnation Method in Sequence for SCR Reaction with Urea. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2004, 429, 1093–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Banús, E. D.; Milt, V. G.; Miró, E. E.; Ulla, M. A. Catalytic Coating Synthesized onto Cordierite Monolith Walls. Its Application to Diesel Soot Combustion. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 132–133, 479–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Bordejé, E.; Pinilla, J. L.; Lázaro, M. J.; Moliner, R.; Fierro, J. L. G. Vanadium Supported on Carbon-Coated Monoliths for the SCR of NO at Low Temperature: Effect of Pore Structure. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 50, 235–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japke, E.; Casapu, M.; Trouillet, V.; Deutschmann, O.; Grunwaldt, J. Soot and Hydrocarbon Oxidation over Vanadia-Based SCR Catalysts. Catal. Tod. 2005, 258, 461–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzarotti, R.; Italiano, C.; Pino, L.; Cristiani, C.; Vita, A. Ni/CeO2-Thin Ceramic Layer Depositions on Ceramic Monoliths for Syngas Production by Oxy Steam Reforming of Biogas. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 149, 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedyagin, A. A.; Volodin, A. M.; Kenzhin, R. M. Effect of Metal-Metal and Metal-Support Interaction on Activity and Stability of Pd-Rh/Alumina in CO Oxidation. Catal. Tod. 2016, 6, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Putluru, S. S.; Schill, L.; Godiksen, A.; Poreddy, R. Promoted V2O5/TiO2 Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 at Low Temperatures. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 183, 282–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, S.; Harold, M. P.; Kamasamudram, K. Experimental and Modeling Study of Selective Ammonia Oxidation on Multi-Functional Washcoated Monolith Catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 278, 24–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colussi, S.; Boaro, M.; De Rogatis, L.; Pappacena, A. Room Temperature Oxidation of Formaldehyde on Pt-Based Catalysts: A Comparison between Ceria and Other Supports (Tio2, Al2O3 and ZrO2). Catal. Today 2015, 253, 163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, W. Y.; Hadjar, A.; Klotz, M.; Leloup, J. Environmental NOx Storage Capacity of Ceria-Stabilized Zirconia-Based Catalysts. Appl. Catal. B, Environ. 2013, 130–131, 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, L.; Zhang, Y. A Simple Method for Preparing the Highly Dispersed Supported Co3O4 on Silica Support. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 4212–4215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burattin, P.; Che, M.; Louis, C. Ni/SiO2 Materials Prepared by Deposition-Precipitation: Influence of the Reduction Conditions and Mechanism of Formation of Metal Particles. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000, 45, 10482–40489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitter, J. H.; Van, D. L.; Slotboom, G. T.; Van Dillen, J.; De Jong, K. P. Synthesis of Highly Loaded Highly Dispersed Nickel on Carbon Nanofibers by Homogeneous Deposition – Precipitation. Catal. Lett. 2003, 89, 139–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nares, R.; Ramírez, J.; Gutiérrez, A.; Cuevas, R. Characterization and Hydrogenation Activity of Ni/Si (Al) - MCM-41 Catalysts. Ind.Eng. Chem.Res. 2009, 48, 1154–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, D. T.; Du, L. Development of Nano-NiO/Al2O3 Catalyst to Be Used for Tar Removal in Biomass Gasification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 16, 6224–6229.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Lee, M. K.; Van Dillen, J.; Bitter, J. H.; De Jong, K. P. Deposition Precipitation for the Preparation of Carbon Nanofiber Supported Nickel Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 39, 13573–13582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrandon, M.; Carnö, J.; Järås, S. G.; Björnbom, E. Total Oxidation Catalysts Based on Manganese or Copper Oxides and Platinum or Palladium I: Characterisation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1999, 1–2, 141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.; Zeng, H. C. Manipulative Synthesis of Multipod Frameworks for Self-Organization and Self-Amplification of Cu2O Microcrystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 2004, 2, 273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, X.; Tu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Mai, Y.; Wang, X.; Gu, C.; Zhao, X. Free Standing Co3O4 Nanowire Array for High Performance Supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 1835–1841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.; Zeng, H. C. Controlled Synthesis and Self-Assembly of Single-Crystalline CuO Nanorods and Nanoribbons. Cryst. Growth Design. 2004, 2, 397–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondej, F.; Bück, A.; Tsotsas, E. Comparative Analysis of the Coating Thickness on Single Particles Using X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography and Confocal Laser-Scanning Microscopy. Powder Technol. 2016, 287, 330–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, S.; Lowe, C.; Lewis, O.; Greenfield, D. Development and Optimisation of Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscopy as a Technique to Investigate Cross-Sections of Organic Coatings. Prog. Org. Coatings. 2017, 106, 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F.; Gong, M.; Zhang, G.; Li, J. Effect of the Loading Content of CuO on the Activity and Structure of CuO/Ce-Mn-O Catalysts for CO Oxidation. J. Rare Earths. 2015, 6, 604–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, J. L.; Pereira, M. F.; Freitas, M. M.; Orfao, J. J. Modification of the Surface Chemistry of Activated Carbons. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 1999, 37, 1379–1389.
   Google Scholar
• Stakheev, A. Y.; Kustov, L. Effects of the Support on the Morphology and Electronic Properties of Supported Metal Clusters: Modern Concepts and Progress in 1990s. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1999, 188, 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, H. K.; Baird, R. J.; Hammerle, R. H.; Adamczyk, A. A.; Pakko, J. D. Measurement of Automotive Catalyst Washcoat Loading Parameters by Microscopy Techniques. Microsc. Microanal. 2003, 5, 267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, T.; Wu, X.; Gao, Y.; Lin, Q.; Hu, J.; Weng, D. Comparative Study on Sulfur Poisoning of V2O5-Sb2O3/TiO2 and V2O5-WO3/TiO2 Monolithic Catalysts for Low-Temperature NH3-SCR. Catal. Commun. 2017, 93, 33–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzehlouyan, T.; Sampara, C. S.; Li, J.; Kumar, A.; Epling, W. S. Kinetic Study of Adsorption and Desorption of SO2 over γ -Al2o3 and Pt/γ-Al2o3. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 181, 587–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, A.; Ferri, D.; Aguirre, M. The Influence of Chemical and Thermal Aging on the Catalytic Activity of a Monolithic Diesel Oxidation Catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 93, 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Garrido, J. C.; Gaona, D.; Gómez, D. M. Combined (S) TEM-FIB Insight into the Influence of the Preparation Method on the Final Surface Structure of a Co3O4/La-Modified-CeO2 Washcoated Monolithic Catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013, 25, 13028–13036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonova, S.; Tamm, S.; Montreuil, C.; Lambert, C.; Olsson, L. The Effect of Iron Loading and Hydrothermal Aging on One-Pot Synthesized Fe/SAPO-34 for Ammonia SCR. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 180, 775–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Garrido, J. C.; Gaona, D.; Gómez, D. M. Comparative Study of the Catalytic Performance and Final Surface Structure of Co3O4/La-Ceo2Washcoated Ceramic and Metallic Honeycomb Monoliths. Catal. Tod. 2015, 253, 190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Bordeje, E.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J. A. Preparation and Characterisation of Carbon-Coated Monoliths for Catalyst Supports. Carbon. 2002, 7, 1079–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Bordejé, E.; Lázaro, M. J.; Moliner, R.; Galindo, J. F.; Sotres, J.; Baró, A. M. Structure of Vanadium Oxide Supported on Mesoporous Carbon-Coated Monoliths and Relationship with Its Catalytic Performance in the SCR of NO at Low Temperatures. J. Catal. 2004, 2, 395–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ola, O.; Maroto-Valer, M. M. Synthesis, Characterization and Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of Metal Based TiO2 Monoliths for CO2 Reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 283, 1244–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hendawy, A. N.;. Influence of HNO3 Oxidation on the Structure and Adsorptive Properties of Corncob-Based Activated Carbon. Carbon. 2003, 41, 713–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M.; Wang, X.; Zou, X.; Ding, W.; Lu, X. Influence of Calcination Temperature on Textural and Structural Properties, Reducibility, and Catalytic Behavior of Mesoporous γ-Alumina-Supported Ni–Mg Oxides by One-Pot Template-Free Route. J. Catal. 2015, 329, 151–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, S.; Dhal, G. C.; Prasad, R.; Mohan, D. Effect of Nitrate Metal (Ce, Cu, Mn and Co) Precursors for the Total Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide. Resour. Technol. 2017, 3, 293–302.
   Google Scholar
• Kiełtyka, M.; Soares, A. P.; Kubiczek, H.; Sarapata, B.; Grzybek, T. The Influence of Poisoning on the Deactivation of DeNOx Catalysts. Comptes. Rendus. Chim. 2015, 10, 1036–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.; Gao, D.; Tong, Z.; Zhang, J.; Luo, H. Oxidation of NO over Cobalt Oxide Supported on Mesoporous Silica. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2009, 18, 421–428.
   Google Scholar
• Phil, H. H.; Reddy, M. P.; Kumar, P. A.; Ju, L. K.; Hyo, J. S. SO2 Resistant Antimony Promoted V2O5/TiO2 Catalyst for NH3-SCR of NOx at Low Temperatures. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 3–4, 301–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasaoka, S.; Sasaoka, E.; Iwasaki, H. Vanadium Oxides (V2ox) Catalysts for Dry-Type and Simultaneous Removal of Sulfur Oxides and Nitrogen Oxides with Ammonia at Low Temperature. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan. 1989, 62, 1226–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singoredjo, L.; Slagt, M.; Wees, J.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, A. Selective Catalyst Reduction of NO with NH3 over Carbon Supported Copper Catalysts. Catal. Tod. 1990, 7, 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Hajari, A.; Marktus, A.; Jeremy, L. H.; Ali, A. R.; Fateme, R. Combined Flue Gas Cleanup Process for Simultaneous Removal of SOx, NOx, and CO2-A Techno-Economic Analysis. Energ. Fuels 2017, 31, 4165–4172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, Z.; Long, A.; Jia, M.; Liu, X. Experimental and Kinetic Study of Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 over CuO/Al2O3/Cordierite Catalyst. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 18, 721–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar