Turkish translation and transcultural validity and reliability of an assessment tool for spasticity: Leg Activity Measure (Leg A)

References

• Royal College of Physicians, National Council for Palliative Care & British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Long-term neurological conditions: management at the interface between neurology, rehabilitation and palliative care (concise guidance to good practice series). London: Royal College of Physicians; 2008. 10.7861/clinmedicine.8-2-186
   Google Scholar
• Sheean GL. Botulinum treatment of spasticity: why is it so difficult to show a functional benefit? Curr Opin Neurol. 2001;14(6):771–776. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200112000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford S, Jackson D, Mahaffey P, et al. Conceptualization and development of the leg activity measure (LegA) for patient and carer reported assessment of activity in the Paretic leg. Physiother Res Int. 2017;22(2):e1660. doi: 10.1002/pri.1660
   Google Scholar
• Ashford SA, Siegert RJ, Williams H, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the leg activity measure (LegA) for outcome measurement in people with brain injury and spasticity. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(7):976–987. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1643933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–1432. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh C, Hsueh I, Mao H. Validity and responsiveness of the rivermead mobility index in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000;32(3):140–142. doi: 10.1080/003655000750045497
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kücükdeveci A, McKenna S, Kutlay S, et al. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham health profile. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000;23(1):31–38. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200023010-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AW, Therneau TM, Schultz BA, et al. Measure of functional independence dominates discharge outcome prediction after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Stroke. 2015;46(4):1038–1044. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashear A, Zafonte R, Corcoran M, et al. Inter-and intrarater reliability of the Ashworth scale and the disability assessment scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(10):1349–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb G, et al. The rivermead mobility index: a further development of the rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13(2):50–54. doi: 10.3109/03790799109166684
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green J, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel index, the rivermead mobility index, the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale and the frenchay activities Index in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23(15):670–676. doi: 10.1080/09638280110045382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh JM, Barrett A, Murray D, et al. The modified rivermead mobility Index: reliability and convergent validity in a mixed neurological population. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(14):1133–1139. doi: 10.3109/09638280903171576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(12):1226–1232. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90184-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson E, Cox T. Exploratory factor analysis: a users’ guide. Int J Sel Assess. 1993;1(2):84–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00092.x
   Google Scholar
• Howard MC. A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: what we are doing and how can we improve? Int J Hum Comput. 2016;32(1):51–62. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukaka MM. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257–268. doi: 10.1093/ptj/85.3.257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandyan A, Gregoric M, Barnes M, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disability And Rehabilitation. 2005;27(1–2):2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford SA, Nair A, Hancock D, et al. The leg activity measure, a new measure of passive and active function and impact on quality of life; informing goal setting and outcome evaluation in leg spasticity. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(16):2366–2374. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1697765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt TA. Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychoeducational Assess. 2011;29(4):304–321. doi: 10.1177/0734282911406653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck R. Exploratory factor analysis. In Handbook Of Applied Multivariate Statistics And Mathematical Modeling USA: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2000. p. 265–296.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C-Y, Miyoshi S, Chen C-H, et al. Walking ability and functional status after post-acute care for stroke rehabilitation in different age groups: a prospective study based on propensity score matching. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(11):10704. doi: 10.18632/aging.103288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han P, Zhang W, Kang L, et al. Clinical evidence of exercise benefits for stroke. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;131–151. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4304-8_9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Argyle M. The Nottingham health profile: an analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness groups. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(12):1411–1414. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90207-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar