Comparison of nylon, vicryl, and fibrin glue for nerve grafting in rats

References

• Grinsell D, Keating CP. Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:698256. doi: 10.1155/2014/698256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundborg G. Nerve injury and repair – a challenge to the plastic brain. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2003;8(4):209–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2003.03027.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CA, Braza D, Rice JB, et al. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in extremity trauma. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;87(5):381–385. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815e6370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fg M, Khan WS, S H. Peripheral nerve injury: principles for repair and regeneration. Open Orthop J. 2014;8(1):199–203. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benfield C, Isaacs J, Mallu S, et al. Comparison of nylon suture versus 2 fibrin glue products for delayed nerve coaptation in an animal model. J Hand Surg Am. 2021;46(2):119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cham RB, Peimer CA, Howard CS, et al. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable suture for microneurorrhaphy. J Hand Surg. 1984;9(3):434–440. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80238-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donzelli R, Capone C, Sgulo FG, et al. Vascularized nerve grafts: an experimental study. Neurological res. 2016;38(8):669–677. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1198527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglia G, Rosatti F, Giannone AG, et al. Vascularized versus free nerve grafts: an experimental study on rats. J Pers Med. 2023;13(12):1682. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sames M, Blahos J Jr., Rokyta R, et al. Comparison of microsurgical suture with fibrin glue connection of the sciatic nerve in rabbits. Physiol Res. 1997;46(4):303–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu L, Adam C, Legagneux J, et al. Reduction of neural scarring after peripheral nerve suture: an experimental study about collagen membrane and autologous vein wrapping. Chir Main. 2012;31(6):311–317. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2012.10.167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers RR. Anatomy and microanatomy of peripheral nerve. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1991;2(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/S1042-3680(18)30753-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne M, Aly A. The surgical suture. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(Supplement_2):S67–S72. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz036
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molea G, Schonauer F, Bifulco G, et al. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (polydioxanone, poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631). Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53(2):137–141. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chow N, Miears H, Cox C, et al. Fibrin glue and its alternatives in peripheral nerve repair. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;86(1):103–108. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameem M, Wood TJ, Bain JR. A systematic review on the use of fibrin glue for peripheral nerve repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2381–2390. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131cf5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman JE, Duraku LS, de Jong T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of fibrin glue in peripheral nerve repair: can we just glue it? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(3):1018–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlock EL, Kasukurthi R, Yan Y, et al. Fibrin glue mitigates the learning curve of microneurosurgical repair. Microsurgery. 2010;30(3):218–222. doi: 10.1002/micr.20754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz NI, Debs N, Fiol RE. Evaluation of fibrin glue in rat sciatic nerve repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78(3):369–373. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198609000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple CL, Ross DC, Dunning CE, et al. Resistance to disruption and gapping of peripheral nerve repairs: an in vitro biomechanical assessment of techniques. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004;20(8):645–650. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-861525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellenbrand DJ, Kaeppler KE, Ehlers ME, et al. Immunohistochemical assessment of rat nerve isografts and immunosuppressed allografts. Neurological res. 2016;38(12):1094–1101. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1248626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Giusti G, Wang H, et al. Functional evaluation in the rat sciatic nerve defect model: a comparison of the sciatic functional index, ankle angles, and isometric tetanic force. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1173–1180. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3bfeb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varejao AS, Cabrita AM, Meek MF, et al. Motion of the foot and ankle during the stance phase in rats. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26(5):630–635. doi: 10.1002/mus.10242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuis JR, Dvorakova LS, Vetter I. Methods used to evaluate pain behaviors in rodents. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:284. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves K, Dubner R, Brown F, et al. A new and sensitive method for measuring thermal nociception in cutaneous hyperalgesia. Pain. 1988;32(1):77–88. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90026-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellenbrand DJ, Kaeppler KE, Hwang E, et al. Basic techniques for long distance axon tracing in the spinal cord. Microsc Res Tech. 2013;76(12):1240–1249. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellenbrand DJ, Haldeman CL, Lee JS, et al. Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury via sustained growth factor delivery from mineral-coated microparticles. Neural Regen Res. 2021;16(5):871–877. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.297786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Scipio F, Raimondo S, Tos P, et al. A simple protocol for paraffin-embedded myelin sheath staining with osmium tetroxide for light microscope observation. Microscopy Res Technique. 2008;71(7):497–502. doi: 10.1002/jemt.20577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abihaidar N, Thuret G, Gain P, et al. Treatment of mechanical corneal wounds emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: absorbable 10-0 vicryl (polyglactin 910) sutures as a suitable strategy. J Pers Med. 2022;12(6):866. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaydes JE. An evaluation of 8-0 polyglactin 910 synthetic absorbable suture in cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 1976;7(2):55–61. doi: 10.3928/1542-8877-19760701-11
   Google Scholar
• Cowden JW. The clinical evaluation of 9-0 and 10-0 monofilament Polyglactin 910 absorbable suture for corneal surgery. Ophthalmic Surg. 1979;10(1):50–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson & Johnson MedTech. Ethicon Coated VICRYL® (polyglactin 910) Suture. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Najibi S, Banglmeier R, Matta J, et al. Material properties of common suture materials in orthopaedic surgery. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:84–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan T, Lawrence N. Comparison of poliglecaprone-25 and polyglactin-910 in cutaneous surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(9):1340–1344. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G G. Wound closure materials and instruments. In: Bolognia J Rapini R, editors. Dermatology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, (UK): Mosby Elsevier; 2008. p. 2183–2193.
   Google Scholar
• Arroll Manato Tk J, Kobayashi I, Shima K, et al. The role of macrophages in the absorption process of suture materials: a histological and immunohistochemical study J-STAGE. Acta Histochem Cytochem. 1998;31(2):113–120. doi: 10.1267/ahc.31.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad VS, et al. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 1998;45(1):116–122. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ML, Rivlin M, Graham JG, et al. Peripheral nerve injury, scarring, and recovery. Connect Tissue Res. 2019;60(1):3–9. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2018.1489381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lolignier S, Eijkelkamp N, Wood JN. Mechanical allodynia. Pflugers Arch - Eur J Physiol. 2015;467(1):133–139. doi: 10.1007/s00424-014-1532-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel C, Rohde C, Brushart TM. Pathway sampling by regenerating peripheral axons. J Comp Neurol. 2005;485(3):183–190. doi: 10.1002/cne.20436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhout S, Kam J, Robert MC, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis: fibrin glue versus sutures for conjonctival fixation during pterygion surgery. Can J Ophthalmol. 2022;57(1):41–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egloff DV, Narakas A. Nerve anastomoses with human fibrin. Preliminary clinical report (56 cases). Ann Chir Main. 1983;2(2):101–115. doi: 10.1016/s0753-9053(83)80087-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narakas A. The use of fibrin glue in repair of peripheral nerves. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988;19(1):187–199. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30342-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla IA, Tecce MG, Broach RB, et al. Retromuscular mesh repair using fibrin glue: early outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an evolving technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(4):e2184. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maragh H, Meyer BS, Davenport D, et al. Morphofunctional evaluation of fibrin glue versus microsuture nerve repairs. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1990;6(4):331–337. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1006838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura MT, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH, et al. Mechanical resistance of peripheral nerve repair with biological glue and with conventional suture at different postoperative times. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008;24(5):327–332. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1080535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar