Connected Learning in the Public Library: An Evaluative Framework for Developing Virtual Learning Spaces for Youth

REFERENCES

• Austin, K., S. B. Ehrlich, C. Puckett, and J. Singleton. 2011. YOUmedia Chicago: Reimagining learning, literacies, and libraries—A snapshot of year 1. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago Urban Education Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. L., and F. W. Lancaster. 1991. The measurement and evaluation of library services. Washington, DC: Information Resources Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C. 1998. Public participation in environmental decisions: An evaluation framework using social goals. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., J. T. Snead, P. T. Jaeger, and C. R. McClure. 2006. “Functionality, usability, and accessibility: Iterative user-centered evaluation strategies for digital libraries .” Performance Measurement and Metrics 7 (1): 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Blixrud, J. C. 2003. Measures for electronic use: The ARL E-Metrics project. Occasional Paper, Loughborough University of Technology Department of Information and Library Studies Library and Information Statistics Unit, Loughborough, England.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S., S. Boyd, and K. Rapp. 1997. Taking stock: A practical guide to evaluating your own programs. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, L. W., M. L. Hartman, S. Hughes-Hassel, and K. Kumasi. 2014. The future of library services for and with teens: A call to action. Chicago: Young Adult Library Services Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., M. Resnick, and A. Monroy-Hernandez. 2010. Making projects, making friends: Online community as a catalyst for interactive media creation. New Directions for Youth Development 128: 75–83. http://web.media.mit.edu/∼mres/papers/NDYD-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, K. 2011. “Going social at Vancouver Public Library: What the virtual branch did next .” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 45 (3): 259–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and Strauss, A., eds. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, T. A., and I. C. Cobb. 2011. “Computer literacy needs in a traditional library literacy program: Results of a needs analysis .” TechTrends 55 (6): 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Das, R. 2011. “Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre .” European Journal of Communication 26 (4): 343–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearnley, C. 2005. “A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews .” Nurse Researcher 13 (1): 19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuhr, N., G. Tsakonas, T. Aalberg, M. Agosti, P. Hansen, S. Kapidakis, C.-P. Klas, L. Kovács, M. Landoni, A. Micsik, C. Papatheodorou, C. Peters, and I. Sølvberg. 2007. “Evaluation of digital libraries .” International Journal on Digital Libraries 8 (1): 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, S., and D. Fields. 2012. Kids online: A new research agenda for understanding social networking forums. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, H. A., B. Herr-Stephenson, and L. Robinson. 2010. Media ecologies. In Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media, ed. D. Sery, K. Helke, and M. Goldipe, 29–78. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hufford, J. R. 2013. “A review of the literature on assessment in academic and research libraries, 2005 to August 2011 .” Libraries and the Academy 13 (1): 5–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Museum and Library Services. 2013. Learning labs in libraries and museums: About us. http://www.imls.gov/about/learning_labs.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., K. Gutierrez, S. Livingston, B. Penuel, J. Rhodes, K. Salen, J. Schor, J. Sefton-Green, and S. C. Watkins. 2013. Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. http://dmlhub.net/sites/default/files/Connected_Learning_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., K. Clinton, R. Purushotma, A. J. Robison, and M. Weigel. 2006. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kinman, V. 2009. “E-Metrics and library assessment in action .” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 21 (1): 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, F. W. 2009. “The evaluation of library services: A concise review of the existing literature .” Investigación bibliotecológica 9 (18): 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, K., I. Mizuko, E. Brown, M. Hawkins, N. Pinkard, and P. Sebring. 2013. “Safe Space and Shared Interests: YOUmedia Chicago as a Laboratory for Connected Learning.” Digital Media + Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. 2008. “Engaging with media: A matter of literacy? ” Communication, Culture and Critique 1 (1): 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., E. Van Couvering, and N. Thumin. 2008. Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies: Disciplinary, critical, and methodological issues. In Handbook of research on new literacies, ed. J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. J. Leu, 103–32. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., and M. Ito. 2013. Kick-off: Teens and the future of libraries (webinar). Teens and the Future of Libraries Series. http://connectedlearning.tv/kick-teens-and-future-libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. 2004. “A conceptual framework for the holistic measurement and cumulative evaluation of library services.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 41 (1): 496–506.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., and Y. B. Kafai. 2007. What videogame making can teach us about literacy and learning: Alternative pathways into participatory culture. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association Conference, 369–76.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, M. 2010. Meeting learners where they are: A case study of media mashup libraries’ approaches to teaching 21st century literacy skills. St. Paul: Science Museum of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., J. Maloney, A. Monroy-Hernández, N. Rusk, E. Eastmond, K. Brennan, A. Millner, E. Rosenbaum, J. Silver, B. Silverman, and Y. Kafai. 2009. “Scratch: Programming for all .” Communications of the ACM 52 (11): 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracevic, T., and L. Covi. 2000. “Challenges for digital library evaluation .” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting: American Society for Information Science 37: 341–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sebring, P., and E. Brown. 2013. Teens, digital media, and the Chicago Public Library: A study of YOUmedia’s progress (webinar). http://connectedlearning.tv/penny-sebring-eric-brown-teens-digital-media-and-chicago-public-library-study-youmedias-progress.
   Google Scholar
• Sebring, P. B., E. R. Brown, K. M. Julian, S. B. Ehrlich, S. E. Sporte, E. Bradley, and L. Meyer. 2013. Teens, digital media, and the Chicago Public Library. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago Urban Education Institute. http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/teens-digital-media-and-chicago-public-library.
   Google Scholar
• Sery, D., K. Helke, and M. Goldipe, eds. 2010. Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., J. Ahn, A. Waugh, N. Greene Taylor, A. Druin, K. Fleischmann, and G. Walsh. 2013. “Crosswalk between the framework for K–12 science education and Standards for the 21st century learner: School librarians as the crucial link.” School Library Research 16. http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/aaslpubsandjournals/slr/vol16/SLR_CrosswalkbetweenFrameworkStandards_V16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. 2007. “Public service and motivation: Does mission matter?” Public Administration Review 67 (1): 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YALSA. 2012. “National teen space guidelines.” http://www.ala.org/yalsa/sites/ala.org.yalsa/files/content/guidelines/guidelines/teenspaces.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zickuhr, K., H. Rainie, and K. Purcell. 2013. Younger American’s library habits and expectations. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.
   Google Scholar