The Rural School Leadership Dilemma

REFERENCES

• Berry, W. (1987). Home economics. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C.R., & West, M.R. (2010). Growing pains: The consolidation movement and student outcomes. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 26(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, R. (1999). School size, socioeconomic status and achievement: A Texas replication of inequity in education with a single-unit school addendum. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED433986)
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, R., & Howley, C. (2000). The influence of scale on student performance: A multi-level extension of the Matthew principle. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(22). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n22.html
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, R., & McDonough, M. (1997). Opportunity, community, and reckless lives: Social distress among adolescents in West Virginia. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 6(1), 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M.K., & Elder, G.H. , Jr. (2004). School size and the interpersonal side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational context. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1259–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubberley, E.P. (1914). Rural life and education: A study of the rural-school problem as a phase of the rural-life problem. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Dokoupil, T. (2010, November). Consolidation's failing grade in Indiana. Newsweek, 156(18
   Google Scholar
• Elder, G.H., & Conger, R.D. (2000). Children of the land: Adversity and success in rural America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, W. (1995). School size and student outcomes. Advances in Educational Productivity, 5, 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N.E., & Necochea, J. (1988). School system size and performance: A contingency perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(3), 237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, M. (1996). The ABC's of investing in student performance. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J.L., & Hammond, B. (1912). The village labourer, 1760–1832. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C. (1995). The Matthew principle: A West Virginia replication. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 3, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C. (1996). Compounding disadvantage: The effects of school and district size on student achievement in West Virginia. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(1), 25–32. Retrieved from http://www.acclaim-math.org/docs/jrre_archives/v12,n1,p25-32,Howley.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C. (1999). The Matthew project: State report for Montana. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED433173)
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G., & Howley, C. (1993). Mitigating disadvantage: Effects of small-scale schooling on student achievement in Alaska. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G.H. , Jr. (2001). Student academic achievement and academic engagement: The role of ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, B.K. (2006). For authentic accountability think small. The Journal of Education, 185(3), 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Spradlin, T. E., Carson, F. R., Hess, S. E., & Plucker, J. A. (2010). Revisiting school district consolidation issues. Education Policy Brief, 8(3). Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. (1964). Rebellion in high school. Chicago, IL: Quadrangle.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, P.G. (1995). Call school: Rural education in the Midwest to 1918. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thoreau, H. D. (2004). A Week on the Concord and Merrimack. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogeler, I. (1991). The myth of the family farm: Agribusiness dominance of United States agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar