A Competency Model for Process Dynamics and Control and Its Use for Test Construction at University Level

REFERENCES

• Adams, R., Wu, M.L., Haldane, S., & Sun, X. (2012). ACER ConQuest (Version 3.0.1) [Computer software]. Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, S.F., LeFevre, E.W., Steadman, J.W., Tietjen, J.S., White, K.R., & Whitman, D.L. (2010). Using the fundamentals of engineering (FE) examination as an outcomes assessment tool. Seneca, SC: National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, J.F., & Birney, D.P. (2012). What happens before and after it happens: Insights regarding antecedences and consequences of adult learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(5), 561–562. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (2013). The German funding initiative “Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education”: 23 research projects on engineering, economics and social sciences, education and generic skills of higher education students (KoKoHs Working Papers, 3). Retrieved from http://www.kompetenzen-im-hochschulsektor.de/617_ENG_HTML.php
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. London, UK: Kogan Page Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cedefop (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training). (2009). European guidelines for validating non-formal and informal learning. Retrieved from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/4054_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fang, N. (2012). Using computer simulation and animation to improve student learning of engineering dynamics. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 504–512. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.682
   Google Scholar
• Frey, A., Kroehne, U., Seitz, N.N., & Born, S. (in press). Multidimensional adaptive measurement of competences. In D. Leutner, J. Fleischer, J. Grünkorn, & E. Klieme (Eds.), Competence assessment in education: Research, models, and instruments. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, A., & Seitz, N.N. (2009). Multidimensional adaptive testing in educational and psychological measurement: Current state and future challenges. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (2003). The student evaluation standards: How to improve evaluations of students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapranos, P. (2013). Teaching and learning in engineering education—Are we moving with the times? Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.707
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practise, 41, 212–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kümmerer, B. (2001). Trying the impossible: Teaching mathematics to physicists and engineers. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 321–334). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, A., & DiPrete, T.A. (2013). Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1519–1541. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, I.D., & Andrich, D. (2008). Effects of varying magnitude and patterns of local dependence in the unidimensional Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 105–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterlind, S.J. (2002). Constructing test items: Multiple-choice, constructed-response, performance, and other formats (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Kulwer.
   Google Scholar
• Rensaa, R.J. (2014). The impact of lecture notes on an engineering student's understanding of mathematical concepts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 34, 33–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S.G., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1991). On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K. (2013). OECD assessment of higher education learning outcomes (AHELO): Rationale, challenges and initial insights from the feasibility study. In S. Blömeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn, & J. Fege (Eds.), Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education (pp. 113–126). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissenschaftsrat [Scientific Council]. (2008). Empfehlungen zur Qualitätsverbesserung von Lehre und Studium [Recommendations for improvement in quality of teaching and studies] (No. Drs. 8639-08). Retrieved from http://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/86 39-08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yen, W.M. (1993). Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 187–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00423.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar