492
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Gender Effects in Assessment of Economic Knowledge and Understanding: Differences Among Undergraduate Business and Economics Students in Germany, Japan, and the United States

, , , , , & show all

REFERENCES

  • Adams, R.J., Wu, M.L., & Wilson, M.R. (2012). ACER ConQuest 3.0.1. Camberwell, UK: ACER.
  • AERA, APA, & NCME (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Bacon, D.R. (2003). Assessing learning outcomes: A comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions in a marketing context. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 31–36.
  • Ballard, C.L., & Johnson, M.F. (2004). Basic math skills and performance in an introductory economics class. The Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 3–23.
  • Beck, K. (1993). Dimensionen der ökonomischen Bildung: Meßinstrumente und Befunde; Abschlußbericht zum DFG-Projekt (Az.II A 4 - Be 1077/3): Wirtschaftskundlicher Bildung-Test (WBT), Normierung und internationaler Vergleich [Dimensions of economic education: Measuring instruments and findings; final report on the DFG-funded project (Az.II A 4 - Be 1077/3): Wirtschaftskundlicher Bildung-Test (WBT), standardization and international comparison]. Nuremberg, Germany: University Erlangen-Nürnberg.
  • Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (2000). Can item format (multiple choice vs. open-ended) account for gender differences in mathematics achievement? Sex Roles, 42(1/2), 1–21.
  • Ben-Shakhar, G., & Sinai, Y. (1991). Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28(1), 23–35.
  • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham, England: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University.
  • Black, H.T., & Duhon, D.L. (2003). Evaluating and improving student achievement in business programs: The effective use of standardized assessment tests. Journal of Education for Business, 79(2), 90–98.
  • Bolger, N., & Cellaghan, T. (1990). Method of measurement and gender differences in scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(2), 165–174.
  • Bond, T.G., & Fox, C.M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Brückner, S., Förster, M., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Walstad, W.B. (2015). Effects of prior economic education, native language, and gender on economic knowledge of first-year students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(3), 437–453.
  • Butler, J.S., Finegan, T.A., & Siegfried, J.J. (1998). Does more calculus improve student learning in intermediate micro- and macroeconomic theory? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 13(2), 185–202.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Connell, R. (2009). Gender—In world perspective (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Davies, P., Mangan, J., & Telhaj, S. (2005). Bold, reckless and adaptable? Explaining gender differences in economic thinking and attitudes. British Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 29–48.
  • Davison, D.G., & Kilgore, J.H. (1971). A model for evaluating the effectiveness of economic education in primary grades. The Journal of Economic Education, 3, 17–25.
  • de Ayala, R.J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N.M., & Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum-likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–38.
  • Federal Statistical Office (2014). Statistik der Studierenden Deutschland —Studienanfänger WS 2012/2013 und 2013/2014. [Overview of higher education students in Germany—First years winter terms 2012/13 and 2013/14.] Wiesbaden, Germany: Federal Statistical Office.
  • Förster, M., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Brückner, S., Happ, R., Hambelton, R., Walstad, B.W., Asano, T., & Yamaoka, M. (2015). Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison: Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 14–23.
  • Frey, A., Hartig, J., & Rupp, A. (2009). Booklet designs in large-scale assessments of student achievement: Theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 39–53.
  • Goodwin, K.S., Ostrom, L., & Scott, K.W. (2009). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy and back substitution in multiple-choice assessment. Journal of Adult Education, 38(1), 22–42.
  • Graham, J.W., Cumsille, P.E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J.A. Schinka & W.F. Velicer (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2 of Handbook of psychology, pp. 87–114). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Happ, R., & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (2014). Assessing the quality of the bachelor degree courses: An analysis of their effects on students’ acquisition of economic content knowledge. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 9(2), 64–77.
  • Hassmén, P., & Hunt, D.P. (1994). Human self-assessment in multiple-choice testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(2), 149–160.
  • Hirschfeld, M., Moore, R.L., & Brown, E. (1995). Exploring the gender gap on the GRE subject test in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 26(1), 3–16.
  • International Test Commission (ITC). (2005). International guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Retrieved from http://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation.pdf
  • Jackstadt, S.L., & Grootaert, C. (1980). Gender, gender stereotyping, and socioeconomic background as determinants of economic knowledge and learning. Journal of Economic Education, 12, 34–40.
  • Jang, K., Hahn, K., & Kim, K. (2010). Comparative Korean results of TUCE with U.S. and Japan. In M. Yamaoka, W.B. Walstad, M. Watts, T. Asano, & S. Abe (Eds.), Comparative studies on economic education in Asia-Pacific region (pp. 53–78). Tokyo, Japan: Shumpusha.
  • King, V., & Flaake, K. (Eds.). (2005). Männliche Adoleszenz. Sozialisation und Bildungsprozesse zwischen Kindheit und Erwachsensein [Male adolescence. Socialization and formation processes between childhood and adulthood]. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
  • Ladd, H.F. (1977). Male-female differences in precollege economic education. In: D.R. Wentworth, W.L. Hansen, & S.H. Hawke (Eds.), Perspectives on economic education (pp. 145–155). New York, NY: Joint Council on Economic Education.
  • Liu, O.L., Wilson, M., & Paek, I. (2008). A multidimensional Rasch analysis of gender differences in PISA mathematics. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(1), 18–35.
  • Lüdecke-Plümer, S., & Sczesny, C. (1998). Ökonomische Bildung im internationalen Vergleich [International comparison of economic education](Working paper). Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz: business education, 11.
  • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2007). Umgang mit fehlenden Werten in der psychologischen Forschung [Handling missing values in psychological research]. Psychologische Rundschau, 58(2), 103–117.
  • Lumsden, K.G. and Scott, A. (1987). The economics student reexamined: Male-female differences in comprehension. The Journal of Economic Education, 18(4), 1365–1375.
  • Makridou-Bousiou, D. (2006). Gender differences in economic knowledge in Greece. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 5(11), 35–42.
  • Mankiw, N.G. (2012). Principles of economics (6th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • MEXT (2014). School basic survey 2014. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
  • Mislevy, R.J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56(2), 177–196.
  • OECD (2011). Tuning-AHELO conceptual framework of expected and desired learning outcomes in economics. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/tuning-ahelo-conceptual-framework-of-expected-and-desired-learning-outcomes-in-economics_5kghtchwb3nn-en
  • OECD (2013). Assessment of higher education learning outcomes: Feasibility study report, Volume 3—Further insights. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  • Owen, A.L. (2012). Student characteristics, behavior, and performance in economics classes. In G.M. Hoyt, & K. McGoldrick (Eds.), International handbook on teaching and learning economics (pp. 341–350). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Parker, K. (2006). The effect of students characteristics on achievement in introductory microeconomics in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 74(1), 137–149.
  • Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons.
  • Samuelson, P.A., & Nordhaus, W.D. (2010). Economics (19th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  • Schaeper, H. (2013). The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS): Assessing competencies over the life course and in higher education. In S. Blömeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn, & J. Fege (Eds.), Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education (pp. 147–158). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Schumann, S., Eberle, F., & Oepke, M. (2013). Ökonomisches Wissen und Können am Ende der Sekundarstufe II: Effekte der Bildungsgang-, Klassen- und Geschlechtszugehörigkeit [Economic knowledge and skills at the end of upper secondary education: Effects of educational course, school class, and gender]. In U. Faßhauer, B. Fürstenau, & E. Wuttke (Eds.), Jahrbuch der berufs- und wirtschaftspädagogischen Forschung 2013 (pp. 35–46). Opladen, Germany: Budrich (Schriftenreihe der Sektion Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (DGfE).
  • Siebens, J., & Ryan, C.L. (2012). Field of bachelor's degree in the United States: 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Siegfried, J.J. (1979). Male-female differences in economic education: A survey. The Journal of Economic Education, 10(2), 1–11.
  • Siegfried, J.J., & Walstad, W.B. (2014). Undergraduate coursework in economics: A survey perspective. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(2), 147–158.
  • Walstad, W.B., & Robson, D. (1997). Differential item functioning and male-female differences on multiple-choice tests in economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 28(2), 155–171.
  • Walstad, W.B., Watts, M., & Rebeck, K. (2007). Test of understanding in college economics: Examiner's manual (4th ed.). New York, NY: National Council on Economic Education.
  • Wang, W.-C., & Chen, C.-T. (2005). Item parameter recovery, standard error estimates, and fit statistics of the Winsteps program for the family of Rasch models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(3), 376–404.
  • Williams, M.L., Waldauer, C., & Duggal, V.G. (1992). Gender differences in economic knowledge: An extension of the analysis. The Journal of Economic Education, 23(3), 219–231.
  • Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Winther, E., & Achtenhagen, F. (2008). Kompetenzstrukturmodell für die kaufmännische Bildung: Adaptierte Forschungslinien und theoretische Ausgestaltung [Competence structure model for vocational education and training: Adapted lines of research and theoretical design]. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 104(4), 511–537.
  • Wu, M., & Adams, R. (2007). Applying the Rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne, Australia: Educational Measurement Solutions.
  • Yamaoka, M., Asano, T., & Abe, S. (2007). Economic literacy of Japanese high school and university students: An international comparison based on the TEL3. In M. Yamaoka, T. Asano, S. Abe, & K. Rebeck (Eds.), Comparative studies on economic education in Asia-Pacific region: Economic literacy in high school and university (pp. 51–79). Tokyo, Japan: Kokusai-Bunken Publishing.
  • Yamaoka, M., Asano, T., & Abe, S. (2010). Economic education for undergraduate students in Japan: The status quo and its problem. Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 14, 5–22.
  • Yamaoka, M., Asano, T., Abe, S., & Rebeck, K. (2007). Comparative studies on economic education in Asia-Pacific region: Economic literacy in high school and university. Tokyo, Japan: Kokussai-Bunken Publishing.
  • Yamaoka, M., Walstad, W.B., Watts, M.W., Asano, T., & Abe, S. (2010). Comparative studies on economic education in Asia-Pacific region. Tokyo, Japan: Shumpusha Publishing.
  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Förster, M., Brückner, S., & Happ, R. (2014). Insights from a German assessment of business and economics competence. In H. Coates (Ed.), Higher education learning outcomes assessment—International perspectives (pp. 175–197). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Förster, M., & Kuhn, C. (2013). Modeling and measurement of university students’ subject-specific competencies in the domain of business & economics—The ILLEV Project. In S. Blömeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn, & J. Fege (Eds.), Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education (pp. 159–170). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Förster, M., Schmidt, S., Brückner, S., & Beck, K. (2015). Erwerb wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachkompetenz im Studium—Eine mehrebenanalytische Betrachtung von hochschulischen und individuellen Einflussfaktoren [Acquisition of professional competence in business and economics over the course of studies in higher education—A multilevel analysis of institutional and personal influence factors]. In S. Blömeke & O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia (Eds.), Kompetenzen von Studierenden (pp. 116–134). Topical Issue of the Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Weinheim and Basel, Germany and Switzerland: Beltz.
  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Shavelson, R.J., & Kuhn, C. (2015). The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(3), 393–411.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.