Towards a Competency Model for Teaching Computer Science

REFERENCES

• ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. 2013. Computer science curricula 2013: Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer science. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2534860.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., & Wilson, S. (1997). Critical incident technique. In D.L. Whetzel & G.R. Wheaton (Eds.), Applied measurement methods in industrial psychology (pp. 89–112). Palo Alto, CA: Davis-Black.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L., Thames, M.H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (2013). Professional competence of teachers, cognitively activating instruction, and the development of students’ mathematical literacy (COACTIV): A research program. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, E., Schaper, N., Caspersen, M.E., Margaritis, M., & Hubwieser, P. (2015). Identifying and formulating teachers’ beliefs and motivational orientations for computer science teacher education. Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1004233.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S. (2012). Does greater teacher knowledge lead to student orientation? The relationship between teacher knowledge and teacher beliefs. In J. König (Ed.), Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs (pp. 15–35). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (2008). Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer: Wissen, Überzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und—referendare—Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, W. (1999). Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 133–146). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• CSTA (The Computer Science Teachers Association Standards Task Force). (2011). K–12 computer science standards: Revised 2011. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2593249
   Google Scholar
• Diethelm, I., Hildebrandt, C., & Krekeler, L. (2009). Implementation of computer science in context—A research perspective regarding teacher-training. In Koli Calling ‘09, Proceedings of the 9th Koli Calling Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 97–100). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Diethelm, I., Hubwieser, P., & Klaus, R. (2012). Students, teachers and phenomena: Educational reconstruction for computer science education. In Koli Calling ‘12, Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 164–173). Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2401796.2401823
   Google Scholar
• Dubberke, T., Kunter, M., McElvany, N., Brunner, M., & Baumert, J. (2008). Lerntheoretische Überzeugungen von Mathematiklehrkräften: Einflüsse auf die Unterrichtsgestaltung und den Lernerfolg von Schülerinnen und Schülern. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22(3–4), 193–206. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., Carpenter T.P., & Loef, M. (1990). Teacher belief scale: Cognitively guided instruction project. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, L.T., Doerr, H.M., & Lewis, C.C. (2014). Mathematics teacher's learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 5–36. doi: 10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J.A. C. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B.K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383. doi: 10.1023_A_1011965/830686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubwieser, P., Armoni, M., Brinda, T., Dagiene, V., Diethelm, I., Giannakos, M.N., …  Schubert, S.E. (2011). Computer science/informatics in secondary education. In ITiCSE-WGR ‘11, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education—Working Group Reports (pp. 19–38). doi: 10.1145/2078856.2078859
   Google Scholar
• Hubwieser, P., Armoni, M., Giannakos, M.N., & Mittermeir, R.T. (2014). Perspectives and visions of computer science education in primary and secondary (K–12) schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(2), 7:1–7:9. doi: 10.1145/2602482.
   Google Scholar
• Hubwieser, P., Berges, M., Magenheim, J., Schaper, N., Bröker, K., Margaritis, M.,... Ohrndorf, L. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge for computer science in German teacher education curricula. In M. Caspersen, M. Knobelsdorf, & R. Romeike (Eds.), WiPSCE ‘13, Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 95–103). doi: 10.1145/2532748.2532753
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., Hartig, J., & Rauch, D. (2008). The concept of competence in educational contexts. In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Assessment of competencies in educational contexts (pp. 3–22). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, S. (2009). Fachdidaktisches Wissen und Fachwissen von Mathematiklehrkräften der Sekundarstufe: Konzeptualisierung, Testkonstruktion und Konstruktvalidierung im Rahmen der COACTIV-Studie. Kumulative Habilitationsschrift. Universität Kassel.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. New York, NY: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 289–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., & Pohlmann, B. (2009). Lehrer. In J. Möller & E. Wild (Eds.), Einführung in die Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 261–282). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leutner, D., Hartig, J., & Jude, N. (2008). Measuring competencies: Introduction to concepts and questions of assessment in education. In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Assessment of competencies in educational contexts (pp. 177–192). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J.F., & Hoy, A.W. (2006). Interested instructors: A composite portrait of individual differences and effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 303–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, L., Whiteford, G., Hill, B., Thomas, N., & Fitzgerald, M. (2006). Reflection in intercultural learning: Examining the international experience through a critical incident approach. Reflective Practice, 7(3), 367–381. doi: 10.1080/14623940600837624.
   Google Scholar
• Oser, F. (1997). Standards in der Lehrerbildung. Teil 1: Berufliche Kompetenzen, die hohen Qualitätsmerkmalen entsprechen. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 1, 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Reusser, K., Pauli, C., & Elmer, A. (2011). Berufsbezogene Überzeugungen von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern [Work-related beliefs of teachers]. In E. Terhart, H. Bennewitz, & M. Rothland (Eds.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf (pp. 478–479). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. (2012). Shutdown or restart: The way forward for computing in UK schools. Retrieved from http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/education/policy/computing-in-schools/2012-01-12-Computing-in-Schools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schaper, N. (2009). Aufgabenfelder und Perspektiven bei der Kompetenzmodellierung und -messung in der Lehrerbildung. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 2(1), 166–199.
   Google Scholar
• Schmelzing, S., Wüsten, S., Sandmann, A., & Neuhaus, B. (2008). Evaluation von zentralen Inhalten der Lehrerbildung: Ansätze zur Diagnostik fachdidaktischen Wissens von Biologielehrkräften. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 1(2), 641–661.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, S., & Schwill, A. (2011). Didaktik der Informatik (2nd ed.). Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, L.M., & Spencer, M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Eye, A. (2006). An alternative to Cohen's κ. European Psychologist, 11(1), 12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, F.E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D.S. Rychen & L. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–66). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Spero, R.B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343–356. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar