379
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Prompted Journal Writing Supports Preservice History Teachers in Drawing on Multiple Knowledge Domains for Designing Learning Tasks

, , &

REFERENCES

  • Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
  • Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Hurley, M.M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001029
  • Bigot, L.L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students’ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 445–470. doi: 10.1080/10862960701675317
  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2011). Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 111–130. doi: 10.1007/s11409-011-9075-7
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. doi: 10.1177/0022487105285962
  • Glogger, I., Schwonke, R., Holzäpfel, L., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2012). Learning strategies assessed by journal writing: Prediction of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 452–468. doi: 10.1037/a0026683
  • Hagen, Å., Strømsø, H.I., & Bråten, I. (2009). Epistemic beliefs and external strategy use when learning from multiple documents. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Henke-Bockschatz, G. (2004). Der “Holocaust” als Thema im Geschichtsunterricht. Kritische Anmerkungen [The “Holocaust” in history education. Some critical remarks]. In W. Meseth, M. Proske, & F.-O. Radtke (Eds.), Schule und Nationalsozialismus: Anspruch und Grenzen des Geschichtsunterrichts (pp. 298322). .
  • Kurby, C.A., Britt, M.A., & Magliano, J.P. (2005). The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration. Reading Psychology, 26(4–5), 335–362. doi: 10.1080/02702710500285870
  • Loewenberg Ball, D.L., Hoover Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  • McCrindle, A.R., & Christensen, C.A. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 167–185. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00010-Z
  • Mommsen, H. (1983). Die Realisierung des Utopischen: Die “Endlösung der Judenfrage” im “Dritten Reich” [Implementing the utopic: The “final solution of the Jewish question” during the “Third Reich”]. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 3, 381–420.
  • Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 259–271. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002
  • Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2012). Fostering self-regulated learning by journal writing: How should instructional support be designed to promote high-quality learning? In J.R. Kirby & M.J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 178–200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reigeluth, C.M., & Stein, F.S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 335–382). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Renkl, A. (2008). Lernen und Lehren im Kontext der Schule [Learning and teaching in the context of schools]. In A. Renkl (Ed.), Lehrbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 109–154). Bern, Germany: Huber.
  • Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189×015002004
  • van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
  • Weinstein, C.E., & Mayer, R.E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In C.M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Wiley, J., Goldman, S.R., Graesser, A.C., Sanchez, C.A., Ash, I.K., & Hemmerich, J.A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060–1106. doi: 10.3102/0002831209333183
  • Wolfe, M.B. W., & Goldman, S.R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467–502. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.