Prompted Journal Writing Supports Preservice History Teachers in Drawing on Multiple Knowledge Domains for Designing Learning Tasks

REFERENCES

• Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Hurley, M.M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigot, L.L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students’ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 445–470. doi: 10.1080/10862960701675317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2011). Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 111–130. doi: 10.1007/s11409-011-9075-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. doi: 10.1177/0022487105285962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glogger, I., Schwonke, R., Holzäpfel, L., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2012). Learning strategies assessed by journal writing: Prediction of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 452–468. doi: 10.1037/a0026683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, Å., Strømsø, H.I., & Bråten, I. (2009). Epistemic beliefs and external strategy use when learning from multiple documents. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Henke-Bockschatz, G. (2004). Der “Holocaust” als Thema im Geschichtsunterricht. Kritische Anmerkungen [The “Holocaust” in history education. Some critical remarks]. In W. Meseth, M. Proske, & F.-O. Radtke (Eds.), Schule und Nationalsozialismus: Anspruch und Grenzen des Geschichtsunterrichts (pp. 298322). .
   Google Scholar
• Kurby, C.A., Britt, M.A., & Magliano, J.P. (2005). The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration. Reading Psychology, 26(4–5), 335–362. doi: 10.1080/02702710500285870
   Google Scholar
• Loewenberg Ball, D.L., Hoover Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrindle, A.R., & Christensen, C.A. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 167–185. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00010-Z
   Google Scholar
• Mommsen, H. (1983). Die Realisierung des Utopischen: Die “Endlösung der Judenfrage” im “Dritten Reich” [Implementing the utopic: The “final solution of the Jewish question” during the “Third Reich”]. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 3, 381–420.
   Google Scholar
• Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 259–271. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2012). Fostering self-regulated learning by journal writing: How should instructional support be designed to promote high-quality learning? In J.R. Kirby & M.J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 178–200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C.M., & Stein, F.S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 335–382). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. (2008). Lernen und Lehren im Kontext der Schule [Learning and teaching in the context of schools]. In A. Renkl (Ed.), Lehrbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 109–154). Bern, Germany: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189×015002004
   Google Scholar
• van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C.E., & Mayer, R.E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In C.M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., Goldman, S.R., Graesser, A.C., Sanchez, C.A., Ash, I.K., & Hemmerich, J.A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060–1106. doi: 10.3102/0002831209333183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M.B. W., & Goldman, S.R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467–502. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar