The Desegregation Aims and Demographic Contexts of Magnet Schools: How Parents Choose and Why Siting Policies Matter

REFERENCES

• Armor, D., & Peiser, B. (1998). Competition in education: A case study of interdistrict choice. Boston, MA: Pioneer Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. (2005). All choices created equal? How good parents select “failing” schools. (Working Papers, National Center for Study of Privatization in Education). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. (2007). Space and place: Urban parents’ geographical preferences for schools. The Urban Review, 39(4), 375–404.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R., Levine, R., & Steel, L. (1996). After fifteen years: Magnet schools in urban education. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 154–172). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundation (1992). School choice. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, M. (1990). Extending families: The social networks of parents and their children. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, M., & Brassard, J. (1979). Child development and personal social networks. Child Development, 50, 601–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1987). Families and schools. Educational Researcher, 16(6), 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Coons, J., & Sugarman, S. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. (1995). Other peoples’ children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1986). Rational choice. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2008). The forgotten choice. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S. (1997). A conditional logit model of elementary school choice: What do parents value? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Harris School of Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, C., McLaughlin, K., & Salganik, L. (1993). Parent information for school choice. Boston, MA: Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children's Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J., Howell, W., & Peterson, P. (1998). Lessons from the Cleveland scholarship program. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice (pp. 107–144). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Guin, K. (2005). Understanding how families choose schools. In J. Betts and T. Loveless (Eds.), Getting choice right (pp. 40–60). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, M., Colburn, K., & Lamberti, J. (1995). Private vouchers in Indianapolis: The golden rule program. In T.Moe (Ed.), Private vouchers (pp. 68–82). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henig, J. (1990). Choice in public schools: An analysis of transfer requests among magnet schools. Social Science Quarterly, 71(1), 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henig, J. (1996). The local dynamics of choice: Ethnic preferences and institutional responses. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 95–117). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The Black-White achievement gap. Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, V., Godwin, R., & Kemerer, F. (1996). Public school choice in San Antonio: Who chooses and with what effects. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 50–69). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, V., Thomas, K., & Kemerer, F. (1994). Who chooses and why: A look at five school choice plans. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(9), 678–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossell, C. (1976). School desegregation and White flight. Political Science Quarterly, 90, 675–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossell, C. (1990). The carrot or the stick for school desegregation policy: Magnet schools or forced busing. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1. (2007). 551 U.S. 701
   Google Scholar
• Saporito, S. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50(2), 181–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saporito, S., & Lareau, A. (1999). School selection as a process: The multiple dimensions of race in framing educational choice. Social Problems, 46(3), 418–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Teske, P., Roch, C., & Marschall, M. (1997). Networks to nowhere: Segregation and stratification in networks of information about schools. American Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 1201–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Hawley, G. (2013). City lines, county lines, color lines: The relationships between school and housing segregation in four southern metro areas. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Meier, K. (1995). The case against school choice: Politics, markets, and fools. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Smrekar, C. (1996). The impact of school choice and community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smrekar, C. (2009). Beyond the tipping point in magnet school enrollment: Issues of racial diversity after unitary status. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Smrekar, C., & Goldring, E. (1999). School choice in urban America: Magnet schools and the pursuit of equity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smrekar, C., & Goldring, E. (2009). Unitary status, neighborhood schools, and resegregation. In C. Smrekar & E. Goldring (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (pp. xiii– xxvii). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton-Salazar, R., & Dornbusch, S. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, W. (2008). Geography of opportunity: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teske, P., Fitzpatrick, J., & Kaplan, G. (2007). Open doors: How low-income parents search for the right school. Seattle: University of Washington, Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Useem, E. (1991). Student selection into course sequences in mathematics: The impact of parent involvement and school policies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1(3), 231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Weiher, G., & Tedin, K. (2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(1), 79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welner, K., & Spindler, E. (2009). The post-PICS picture: Examining school districts’ options for mitigating racial segregation. In C. Smrekar & E. Goldring (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom (pp. 49–68). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W.J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, J., Bailey, A., & Thorn, C. (1993). Third year report: The Milwaukee parental choice program. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
   Google Scholar