Selling Schools: Marketing and Recruitment Strategies in New Orleans

REFERENCES

• Bagley, C. (2006). School choice and competition: A public‐market in education revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 32(3), 347–362. doi: 10.1080/03054980600775656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S.J. (1993). Education markets, choice and social class: The market as a class strategy in the UK and the USA. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S.J. (2003). Class strategies and the education market: The middle classes and social advantage. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2003). Shopping for schools: How do marginal consumers gather information about schools? Policy Studies Journal, 31(2), 121–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling‐Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of “No Child Left Behind.” Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• DeBray, E., Scott, J., Lubienski, C., & Jabbar, H. (2014). Intermediary organizations in charter school policy coalitions: Evidence from New Orleans. Educational Policy, 28(2), 175–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMartino, C., & Jessen, S.B. (2014). School brand management: The policies, practices, and perceptions of branding and marketing in New York City's public high schools. Urban Education. doi: 10.1177/0042085914543112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreilinger, D. (2013Two New Orleans high schools said they were “full”—then enrolled more students. The Times Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/education/index.ssf/2013/11/two_new_orleans_high_schools_s.html
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D.N., & Getzler, L.S. (2006). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system? Improving School Accountability, 14, 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., Seigel-Hawley, G., & Wang, J. (2010). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation and the need for civil rights standards. Retrieved from http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/choice-without-equity-2009-report/frankenberg-choices-without-equity-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S. (2001). The managerial school: Post-welfarism and social justice in education. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., Ball, S.J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (2010). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Guin, K., Henig, J.R., Hess, F.M., & Weiss, J. (2005). How school choice affects students who do not choose. In J.R. Betts & T. Loveless (Eds.), Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy (pp. 101–129). Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, B.C., Brinson, D., Boast, L., & Kingsland, N. (2012). New Orleans-style education reform: A guide for cities. Lessons learned 2004–2010. New Orleans, LA: New Schools for New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, J.S., & Weinstein, J.M. (2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1373–1414. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilig, J.V., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75–110. doi: 10.3102/0162373708317689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henig, J.R., & MacDonald, J.A. (2002). Locational decisions of charter schools: Probing the market metaphor. Social Science Quarterly, 83(4), 962–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, L. E. (2016Race and racelessness in CMO marketing: Exploring charter management organizations’ racial construction and its implications. Peabody Journal of Education, 91, 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Holme, J.J., Carkhum, R., & Rangel, V.S. (2013). High pressure reform: Examining urban schools’ response to multiple school choice policies. The Urban Review, 45(2)1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J.G., & Miron, G. (2000). An evaluation of the Michigan charter school initiative: Performance, accountability, and impact. Retrieved from http://homepages.wmich.edu/∼miron/publics/michigan/Chapters_1-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howell, W. (2006). Switching schools? A closer look at parents’ initial interest in and knowledge about the choice provisions of No Child Left Behind. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 140–179. doi: 10.1207/S15327930pje8101_7
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.-T., & Urquiola, M. (2006). The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile's voucher program. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8-9), 1477–1503. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbar, H. (2015). “Every kid is money”: Market-like competition and school leader strategies in New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715577447
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. (2010). School choice or Schools’ choice?: Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, M., & Lindgren, J. (2010). “Great location, beautiful surroundings!” Making sense of information materials intended as guidance for school choice. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(2), 173–187. http://doi.org/10.1080/00313831003637956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasman, M., & Loeb, S. (2013). Principals’ perceptions of competition for students in Milwaukee schools. Education Finance and Policy, 8, 43–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H.F., & Fiske, E.B. (2003). Does competition improve teaching and learning? Evidence from New Zealand. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). Why are schools racially segregated? Implications for school choice policies. In J. Scott (Ed.), School Choice and Diversity: What the Evidence Says (pp. 9–26). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levacic, R. (2004). Competition and the performance of English secondary schools: Further evidence. Education Economics, 12(2), 177–193. doi: 10.1080/0964529042000239186
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2005). School choice as a civil right: District responses to competition and equal educational opportunity. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38, 331–341.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2007). Marketing schools. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2013). Privatising form or function? Equity, outcomes and influence in American charter schools. Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 498–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumby, J., & Foskett, N. (1999). Managing external relations in schools and colleges: International dimensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., & Olson, M. (2013). Democracy lessons in market-oriented schools: The case of Swedish upper secondary education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 8(2), 201–213. doi: 10.1177/1746197913483684
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neild, R.C. (2005). Parent management of school choice in a large urban district. Urban Education, 40(3), 270–297. doi: 10.1177/0042085905274538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I., Hemsley-Brown, J., & Foskett, N.H. (2002). The voice of teachers in marketing their school: Personal perspectives in competitive environments. School Leadership & Management, 22(2), 177–196. doi: 10.1080/1363243022000007746
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Porac, J.F., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Marschall, M., Teske, P., & Roch, C. (1998). School choice and culture wars in the classroom: What different parents seek from education. Social Science Quarterly, 79(3), 489–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (Ed.). (2005). School choice and diversity: What the evidence says. New York, NY: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., & Jabbar, H. (2014). The hub and the spokes: Foundations, intermediary organizations, incentivist reforms, and the politics of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28(2), 233–257. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813515327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welner, K.G. (2013). The dirty dozen: How charter schools influence student enrollment. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID = 17104
   Google Scholar
• West, A., Ingram, D., & Hind, A. (2006). “Skimming the cream”: Admissions to charter schools in the United States and to autonomous schools in England. Educational Policy, 20(4), 615–639. doi: 10.1177/0895904805284054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H.C. (1981). Where do markets come from? American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 517–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. (2012). School choice and the commodification of education: A visual approach to school brochures and websites. Critical Social Policy, 32(1), 69–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T.S., & Carlsen, R.L. (2016School marketing as a sorting mechanism: A critical discourse analysis of charter school websites. Peabody Journal of Education, 91, 24–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., Smith, J., & Farrell, C.C. (2013). Choices and challenges: Charter school performance in perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, P.A. (2000). Varieties and themes in producer engagement: Structure and agency in the schools public-market. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(2), 219–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, P.A., Bagley, C., & Glatter, R. (1998). School choice and competition markets in the public interest. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yettick, H. (2014). Information is bliss: Information use by school choice participants in Denver. Urban Education. doi: 10.1177/0042085914550414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar