6,352
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Review of the Empirical Research on Private School Choice

&

REFERENCES

  • Abdulkadiroglu, A., Pathak, P.A., & Walters, C.R. (2015). School vouchers and student achievement: First-year evidence from the Louisiana Scholarship Program (NBER Working Paper No. 21839). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21839
  • Anrig, G. (2008, April). An idea whose time has gone: Conservatives abandon their support for school vouchers. Washington Monthly. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2008/0804.anrig.html
  • Barnard, J., Frangakis, C.E., Hill, J.L., & Rubin, D.B. (2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(462), 299–311.
  • Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H.F. (2006). School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina's charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(1), 31–56.
  • Bitler, M.P., Domina, T., Penner, E.K., & Hoynes, H.W. (2014). Distributional analysis in educational evaluation: A case study from the New York City voucher program. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 419–450.
  • Black, S.E. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577–599.
  • Burgess, S., Wilson, D. & Lupton, R. (2005). Parallel lives? Ethnic segregation in the playground and the neighborhood, Urban Studies, 42(7), 10–26.
  • Burke, L.M. (2013). The Education debit card: What Arizona parents purchase with education savings accounts. Indianapolis, IN: Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
  • Carnoy, M., Adamson, F., Chudgar, A., Luschei, T.F., & Witte, J.F. (2007). Vouchers and public school performance: A case study of the Milwaukee parental choice program. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Carr, M. (2011). The impact of Ohio's EdChoice on traditional public school performance. Cato Journal, 31(2), 257–284.
  • Chakrabarti, R. (2008). Can increasing private school participation and monetary loss in a voucher program affect public school performance? Evidence from Milwaukee. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5-6), 1371–1393.
  • Chakrabarti, R. (2013). Vouchers, public school response, and the role of incentives: Evidence from Florida. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 500–526.
  • Chingos, M.M., & Peterson, P.E. (2014). Experimentally estimated impacts of school vouchers on college enrollment and degree attainment. Journal of Public Economics, 122, 1–12.
  • Chubb, J.E., & Moe, T.M. (1990). Politics, markets, & America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Clotfelter, C.T. (1999). Public school segregation in metropolitan areas. Land Economics, 75(4), 487–504.
  • Cowen, J.M. (2008). School choice as a latent variable: Estimating the “complier average causal effect” of vouchers in Charlotte. Policy Studies Journal, 36(2), 301–315.
  • Cowen, J.M., Fleming, D.J., Witte, J.F., Wolf, P.J., & Kisida, B. (2013). School vouchers and student attainment: Evidence from a state-mandated study of Milwaukee's Parental Choice Program. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 147–167.
  • Egalite, A.J. (2013). Measuring competitive effects from school voucher programs: A systematic review. The Journal of School Choice, 7(4), 443–464.
  • Egalite, A.J. (2014a). Choice program design and school supply. In M.Q. McShane (Ed.), New and better schools: The supply side of school choice (pp. 163–184). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Egalite, A.J. (2014b). Competitive impacts of means-tested vouchers on public school performance: Evidence from Louisiana and Indiana (PEPG Working Paper No.14-05). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=660A91BD10C9532CC2021ABA5DA04F8D?doi=10.1.1.696.8049&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Egalite, A.J., & Mills, J.N. (2014). The Louisiana Scholarship Program: Contrary to Justice Department claims, student transfers improve racial integration. Education Next, 14(1), 66–69.
  • Figlio, D.N., & Hart, C.M. D. (2014). Competitive effects of means-tested school vouchers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 133–56.
  • Figlio, D., & Rouse, C.E. (2006). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1–2), 239–255.
  • Forster, G. (2006a). Segregation levels in Cleveland Public Schools and the Cleveland Voucher Program. Indianapolis, IN: The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation and the Buckeye Institute.
  • Forster, G. (2006b). Segregation levels in Milwaukee Public Schools and the Milwaukee Voucher Program. Indianapolis, IN: The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation.
  • Forster, G. (2008a). Lost opportunity: An empirical analysis of how vouchers affected Florida public schools. Indianapolis, IN: Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
  • Forster, G. (2008b). Promising start: An empirical analysis of how EdChoice vouchers affect Ohio public schools. Indianapolis, IN: The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
  • Frankenberg, E., & Lee, C. (2002). Race in American public schools: Rapidly resegregating school districts. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
  • Frendeway, M., Sawatka, K., Marcavage, W., Carney, K., Martinez, K., & Dauphin, P. (2015). School choice yearbook 2014–15: Breaking down barriers to school choice. Washington, DC: Alliance for School Choice.
  • Fuller, B., Elmore, R.F. (Eds.), with Orfield, G. (1996). Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effect of school choice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Garcia, D.R. (2008). Academic and racial segregation in charter schools: Do parents sort students into specialized charter schools? Education and Urban Society, 40(5), 590–612.
  • Godwin, R.K., & Kemerer, F.R. (2002). School choice tradeoffs: Liberty, equity, and diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Grady, S., & Bielick, S. (2010). Trends in the use of school choice: 1993 to 2007. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Gray, N.L., Merrifield, J.D., & Adzima, K.A. (2014). A private universal voucher program's effects on traditional public schools. Journal of Economics and Finance, 39(1), 1–26.
  • Greene, J.P. (2001a). An evaluation of the Florida A-Plus Accountability and School Choice Program. New York, NY: The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
  • Greene, J.P. (2001b). Vouchers in Charlotte. Education Next, 1(2), 55–60.
  • Greene, J.P., & Forster, G. (2002). Rising to the challenge: The effect of school choice on public schools in Milwaukee and San Antonio. New York, NY: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
  • Greene, J.P., & Marsh, R.H. (2009). The effect of Milwaukee's Parental Choice Program on student achievement in Milwaukee public schools. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas, School Choice Demonstration Project.
  • Greene, J.P., Mills, J.N., & Buck, S. (2010). The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program's effect on school integration. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas, School Choice Demonstration Project.
  • Greene, J.P., Peterson, P.E., & Du, J. (1998). School choice in Milwaukee: A randomized experiment. In P.E. Peterson & B. Hassel C. (Eds.), Learning from school choice (pp. 335–356). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Greene, J.P., & Winters, M.A. (2004). Competition passes the test. Education Next, 4(3), 66–71.
  • Greene, J.P., & Winters, M.A. (2007). An evaluation of the effect of DC's voucher program on public school achievement and racial integration after one year. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 11(1), 83–101.
  • Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Henig, J.R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Henig, J.R. (1996). The local dynamics of choice: Ethnic preferences and institutional responses. In B. Fuller & R.F. Elmore (Eds.), with G. Orfield, Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effect of school choice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Howell, W., Wolf, P.J., Campbell, D., & Peterson, P.E. (2002). School vouchers and academic performance: Results from three randomized field trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 191–217.
  • Hoxby, C.M. (2003). School choice and school productivity. In C.M. Hoxby (Ed.), The economics of school choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jin, H., Barnard, J., & Rubin, D.B. (2010). A modified general location model for noncompliance with missing data: Revisiting the New York City School Choice Scholarship Program using principal stratification. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 154–173.
  • Kotok, S., Frankenberg, E., Schafft, K.A., Mann, B.A., & Fuller, E.J. (2015). School choice, racial segregation, and poverty concentration: Evidence from Pennsylvania charter school transfers. Educational Policy. doi: 10.1177/0895904815604112
  • Krueger, A., & Zhu, P. (2004). Another look at the New York City voucher experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(5), 658–698.
  • Ladd, H.F., Clotfelter, C.T., & Holbein, J.B. (2015). The growing segmentation of the charter school sector in North Carolina (NBER Working Paper No. 21078). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21078.
  • Lauder, H., & Hughes, D. (1999). Trading in futures: Why markets in education don't work. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
  • Levin, H.M. (1998). Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17(3), 373–392.
  • Lubienski, C.A., & Lubienski, S.T. (2013). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Maddaus, J., & Mirochnik, D.A. (1992). Town tuitioning in Maine: Parental choice of secondary schools in rural communities. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 8(1), 27–40.
  • McClaughry, J. (1987). Educational choice in Vermont. Concord, VT: Institute for Liberty and Community.
  • McShane, M.Q. (Ed.). (2014). New and better schools: The supply side of school choice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2015). Data Dashboard. Retrieved from http://www.publiccharters.org/dashboard/schools/page/overview/year/2014.
  • Ravitch, D. (2011Miracle schools, vouchers and all that educational flim-flam. Nieman Watchdog. Retrieved from http://www.niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ask_this.view&askthisid=503
  • Ritter, G.W., Jensen, N.C., Kisida, B., & Bowen, D.H. (2014). Urban school choice and integration: The effect of charter schools in Little Rock. Education and Urban Society. doi: 10.1177/0013124514546219
  • Ritter, G., Jensen, N., Kisida, B., & McGee, J.B. (2010). A closer look at charter schools and segregation. Education Next, 10(3), 69–73.
  • Rouse, C.E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 553–602.
  • Rouse, C.E., Hannaway, J., Goldhaber, D., & Figlio, D.N. (2013). Feeling the Florida heat: How low performing schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(2), 251–281.
  • Snyder, T.D., & Dillow, S.A. (2015). Digest of Education Statistics 2013. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Stern, S. (2008). School choice isn't enough, City Journal, 18(1
  • Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.
  • Warren, J.R. (2011). Graduation rates for choice and public school students in Milwaukee, 2003–2009. Milwaukee, WI: School Choice Wisconsin.
  • West, M.R., & Peterson, P.E. (2006). The efficacy of choice threats within school accountability systems. The Economic Journal, 116(510), 48–62.
  • Winters, M.A., & Greene, J.P. (2011). Public school response to special education vouchers: The impact of Florida's McKay Scholarship Program on disability diagnosis and student achievement in public schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 138–158.
  • Wolf, P., Gutman, B., Puma, M., Kisida, B., Rizzo, L., Eissa, N., & Carr, M. (2010). Evaluation of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program: Final report. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Wolf, P.J., Kisida, B., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Eissa, N., & Rizzo, L. (2013). School vouchers and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from Washington, DC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(2), 246–270.
  • Zimmer, R., Gill, B., Booker, K., Lavertu, S., Sass, T., & Witte, J. (2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.