1,739
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reflections on Neuroscience in Teacher Education

References

  • Alberts, B. (2009). Making a science of education. Science, 323(5910), 15. doi:10.1126/science.1169941
  • Alferink, L. A., & Farmer-Dougan, V. (2010). Brain-(not) based education: Dangers of misunderstanding and misapplication of neuroscience research. Exceptionality, 18(1), 42–52. doi:10.1080/09362830903462573
  • Amobi, F. A. (2006). Beyond the call: Preserving reflection in the preparation of “highly qualified” teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(2), 23–35.
  • Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 146–151. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007
  • Ansari, D., Coch, D., & De Smedt, B. (2011). Connecting education and cognitive neuroscience: Where will the journey take us? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 37–42. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00705.x
  • Ansari, D., De Smedt, B., & Grabner, R. H. (2012). Neuroeducation—A critical overview of an emerging field. Neuroethics, 5(2), 105–117. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3
  • Belfield, C. R., Nores, M., Barnett, S., & Schweinhart, L. (2006). The High/Scope Perry Preschool Program: Cost-benefit analysis using data from the age-40 followup. The Journal of Human Resources, 41(1), 162–190. doi:10.3368/jhr.XLI.1.162
  • Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won't work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study of an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
  • Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2012). Child development in the context of adversity: Experiential canalization of brain and behavior. American Psychologist, 67(4), 309–318. doi:10.1037/a0027493
  • Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2014). Closing the achievement gap through modification of neurocognitive and neuroendocrine function: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of an innovative approach to the education of children in Kindergarten. PLoS One, 9(11), e112393. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112393
  • Blakemore, S.-J., & Frith, U. (2005). The learning brain: Lessons for education. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X026008004
  • Bruer, J. T. (1999). In search of … brain-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 648–654.
  • Bryck, R. L., & Fisher, P. A. (2012). Training the brain: Practical applications of neural plasticity from the intersection of cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology, and prevention science. American Psychologist, 67(2), 87–100. doi:10.1037/a0024657
  • Byrnes, J. P., & Fox, N. A. (1998). The educational relevance of research in cognitive neuroscience. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 297–342. doi:10.1023/A:1022145812276
  • Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Burchinal, M., Kainz, K., Pan, Y., & Wasik, B. H., … Ramey, C. T. (2012). Adult outcomes as a function of an early childhood educational program: An Abecedarian Project follow-up. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1033–1043. doi:10.1037/a0026644
  • Carter, K., & Doyle, W. (1995). Teacher-researcher relationships in the study of teaching and teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(2), 162–174. doi:10.1080/01619569509538829
  • Christodoulou, J. A., & Gaab, N. (2009). Using and misusing neuroscience in education-related research. Cortex, 45(4), 555–557. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.004
  • Clarà, M. (2015). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261–271. doi:10.1177/0022487114552028
  • Clarke, A. (1995). Professional development in practicum settings: Reflective practice under scrutiny. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(3), 243–261. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)00028-5
  • Coch, D., & Ansari, D. (2009). Thinking about mechanisms is crucial to connecting neuroscience and education. Cortex, 45(4), 546–547. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.001
  • Coch, D., & Ansari, D. (2012). Constructing connection: The evolving field of mind, brain, and education. In S. Della Sala & M. Anderson (Eds.), Neuroscience in education: The good, the bad, and the ugly (pp. 33–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Coch, D., Michlovitz, S. A., Ansari, D., & Baird, A. (2009). Building mind, brain, and education connections: The view from the Upper Valley. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(1), 27–33. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.01050.x
  • Cochran, K. F. (1997). Pedagogical content knowledge: Teachers’ integration of subject matter, pedagogy, students, and learning environments. Research Matters—to the Science Teacher, 9702. https://www.narst.org/publications/research/pck.cfm
  • Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272. doi:10.1177/0022487193044004004
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & The Boston College Evidence Team. (2009). “Re-culturing” teacher education: Inquiry, evidence, and action. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 458–468. doi:10.1177/0022487109347206
  • Copeland, W. D., Birmingham, C., de la Cruz, E., & Lewin, B. (1993). The reflective practitioner in teaching: Toward a research agenda. Teaching & Teacher Education, 9(4), 347–359. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(93)90002-X
  • Cruickshank, W. M. (1981). A new perspective in teacher education: The neuroeducator. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(6), 337–341, 367. doi:10.1177/002221948101400613
  • Daniel, D. B. (2011). Promising principles: Translating the science of learning to educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 251–253. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.004
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.) (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York, NY: Viking.
  • Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(429), 1–8.
  • Diamond, A. (2007). Interrelated and interdependent. Developmental Science, 10(1), 152–158. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00578.x
  • Diamond, A., & Amso, D. (2008). Contributions of neuroscience to our understanding of cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 136–141. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00563.x
  • Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J. J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318(3855), 1387–1388. doi:10.1126/science.1151148
  • Donovan, M. S. (2013). Generating improvement through research and development in education systems. Science, 340(6130), 317–319. doi:10.1126/science.1236180
  • Dubinsky, J. M., Roehrig, G., & Varma, S. (2013). Infusing neuroscience into teacher professional development. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 317–329. doi:10.3102/0013189X13499403
  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
  • Dweck, C. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65(2), 34–39.
  • Dweck, C. S. (2008). Brainology: Transforming students’ motivation to learn. Independent School, 67(2), 110–119.
  • Eisenhart, M., & DeHaan, R. L. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X034004003
  • Etscheidt, S., Curran, C. M., & Sawyer, C. M. (2012). Promoting reflection in teacher preparation programs: A multilevel model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35(1), 7–26. doi:10.1177/0888406411420887
  • Farah, M. J., Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., … Hurt, H. (2006). Childhood poverty: Specific associations with neurocognitive development. Brain Research, 1110(1), 166–174. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.072
  • Ferrari, M. (2011). What can neuroscience bring to education? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 31–36. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00704.x
  • Fischer, K. W., Daniel, D. B., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Stern, E., Battro, A., & Koizumi, H. (2007). Why mind, brain, and education? Why now? Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 1–2. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00006.x
  • Fuller, J. K., & Glendening, J. G. (1985). The neuroeducator: Professional of the future. Theory into Practice, 24(2), 135–137. doi:10.1080/00405848509543161
  • Fusarelli, L. D., & Bass, L. (2015). The politics of inequality, social policy, and educational change. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(5), 597–600. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2015.1087762
  • Gardner, H. (2009). An education grounded in biology: Interdisciplinary and ethical considerations. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(2), 68–73. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01056.x
  • Geake, J. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50(2), 123–133. doi:10.1080/00131880802082518
  • Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 1–14.
  • Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(5), 406–413. doi:10.1038/nrn1907
  • Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534–537. doi:10.1038/nature01647
  • Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Developmental dyslexia: An update on genes, brains, and environments. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(1), 91–125. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00704
  • Gutshall, C. A. (2013). Teachers’ mindsets for students with and without disabilities. Psychology in Schools, 50(10), 1073–1083. doi:10.1002/pits.21725
  • Hackman, D. A., & Farah, M. J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 65–73. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003
  • Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and the brain: Mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(9), 651–659. doi:10.1038/nrn2897
  • Hardiman, M., Rinne, L., Gregory, E., & Yarmolinskaya, J. (2012). Neuroethics, neuroeducation, and classroom teaching: Where the brain sciences meet pedagogy. Neuroethics, 5(2), 135–143. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9116-6
  • Hart, L. A. (1983). Human brain and human learning. Oak Creek, AZ: Books for Educators.
  • Hinton, C., Fischer, K. W., & Glennon, C. (2012). Mind, brain, and education. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
  • Hook, C. J., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Look again: Effects of brain images and mind-brain dualism on lay evaluations of research. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(9), 1397–1405. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00407
  • Howard-Jones, P. A. (2011). From brain scan to lesson plan. The Psychologist, 24(2), 110–113.
  • Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817–824. doi:10.1038/nrn3817
  • Huttenlocher, P. R. (2002). Neural plasticity: The effects of environment on the development of the cerebral cortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jones, B. D., Bryant, L. H., Snyder, J. D., & Malone, D. (2012). Preservice and inservice teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(2), 87–101.
  • Jorgenson, O. (2003). Brain scam? Why educators should be careful about embracing “brain research.” The Educational Forum, 67(4), 364–369. doi:10.1080/00131720308984585
  • Kishiyama, M. M., Boyce, W. T., Jimenez, A. M., Perry, L. M., & Knight, R. T. (2009). Socioeconomic disparities affect prefrontal function in children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(6), 1106–1115. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21101
  • Klahr, D., & Li, J. (2005). Cognitive research and elementary science instruction: From the laboratory, to the classroom, and back. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(2), 217–238. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-4423-5
  • Knox, R. (2016). Mind, brain, and education: A transdisciplinary field. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(1), 4–9. doi:10.1111/mbe.12102
  • Kriss, I., & Evans, B. J. W. (2005). The relationship between dyslexia and Meares-Irlen Syndrome. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3), 350–364. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00274.x
  • Leibbrand, J. A., & Watson, B. H. (2010). The road less traveled: How the developmental sciences can prepare educators to improve student achievement: Policy recommendations. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
  • Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43. doi:10.1177/0022487102053001004
  • Lynott, D.-J., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1994). Teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence and their educational goals. The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(4), 253–264.
  • Mandinach, E. B., Friedman, J. M., & Gummer, E. S. (2015). How can schools of education help to build educators’ capacity to use data? A systematic review of the issue. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–50.
  • McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107(1), 343–352. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017
  • McDevitt, T. M., & Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Fostering conceptual change about child development in prospective teachers and other college students. Child Development Perspectives, 2(2), 85–91. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00045.x
  • McIntosh, R. D., & Ritchie, S. J. (2012). Rose-tinted? The use of coloured filters to treat reading difficulties. In S. Della Sala & M. Anderson (Eds.), Neuroscience in education: The good, the bad and the ugly (pp. 230–243). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. doi:10.1037/a0028228
  • Molfese, D. L. (2000). Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal brain responses. Brain and Language, 72(3), 238–245. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2287
  • Murray, B. (2000). From brain scan to lesson plan. Monitor on Psychology, 31(3). https://www.apa.org/monitor/mar00/brainscan.html
  • National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Nelson, C. S., & Sheridan, M. A. (2011). Lessons from neuroscience research for understanding causal links between family and neighborhood characteristics and educational outcomes. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murname (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances (pp. 27–46). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation & Spencer Foundation.
  • Neville, H. J., Stevens, C., Pakulak, E., Bell, T. A., Fanning, J., Klein, S., & Isbell, E. (2013). Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(29), 12138–12143. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304437110
  • Nolen, A., & Vander Putten, J. (2007). Action research in education: Addressing gaps in ethical principles and practices. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 401–407. doi:10.3102/0013189X07309629
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Understanding the brain: The birth of a learning science. Paris, France: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
  • Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
  • Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Bruening, P. S., & Duffin, L. C. (2011). The role of the educational psychologist in teacher education: Three challenges for educational psychologists. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 71–83. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538648
  • Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. doi:10.1177/0956797615571017
  • Pickering, S. J., & Howard-Jones, P. (2007). Educators’ views on the role of neuroscience in education: Findings from a study of UK and international perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 109–113. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00011.x
  • Pomerance, L., Greenberg, J., & Walsh, K. (2016). Learning about learning: What every new teacher needs to know. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
  • Postholm, M. B. (2009). Research and development work: Developing teachers as researchers or just teachers? Educational Action Research, 17(4), 551–565. doi:10.1080/09650790903309425
  • Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It's ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
  • Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: Policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 721–726. doi:10.1177/1745691615599383
  • Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. Duncan & R. Murname (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances (pp. 91–116). New York, NY: Sage Foundation Press: Russell.
  • Reardon, S. F. (2013). The widening income achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 70(8), 10–16.
  • Redmond, P. (2014). Reflection as an indicator of cognitive presence. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 46–58. doi:10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.46
  • Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00181
  • The Royal Society. (2011). Brain waves module 2: Neuroscience: Implications for education and lifelong learning. London, England: The Royal Society, Science Policy Centre.
  • Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(41), 14931–14936. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506897102
  • Sheridan, K., Zinchenko, E., & Gardner, H. (2006). Neuroethics in education. In J. Illes (Ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy (pp. 265–275). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Shonkoff, J. P., & Levitt, P. (2010). Neuroscience and the future of early childhood policy: Moving from why to what and how. Neuron, 67(5), 689–691. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.032
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Simos, P. G., Breier, J. I., Fletcher, J. M., Bergman, E., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2000). Cerebral mechanisms involved in word reading in dyslexic children: A magnetic source imaging approach. Cerebral Cortex, 10(8), 809–816. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.8.809
  • Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M., Bergman, E., Breier, J. I., Foorman, B. R., & Castillo, E. M., … Papanicolaou, A. C. (2002). Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology, 58(8), 1203–1213. doi:10.1212/WNL.58.8.1203
  • Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M., Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Castillo, E. M., & Davis, R. N., … Papanicolaou, A. C. (2002). Brain activation profiles during the early stages of reading acquisition. Journal of Child Neurology, 17(3), 159–163. doi:10.1177/088307380201700301
  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417
  • Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007015
  • Slavin, R. E. (2003). A reader's guide to scientifically based research. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 12–16.
  • Snow, C. E. (2015). 2014 Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture: Rigor and realism: Doing educational science in the real world. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 460–466. doi:10.3102/0013189X15619166
  • Society for Neuroscience. (2009). The promise of interdisciplinary partnerships between brain sciences and education. Irvine, CA: University of California at Irvine.
  • Stanovich, P. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular and instructional decisions. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
  • Stevens, C., Fanning, J., Coch, D., Sanders, L., & Neville, H. (2008). Neural mechanisms of selective attention are enhanced by computer training: Electrophysiological evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Brain Research, 1205, 55–69. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.108
  • Stevens, C., Lauinger, B., & Neville, H. (2009). Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: An event-related brain potential study. Developmental Science, 12(4), 634–646. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00807.x
  • Sylvan, L. J., & Christodoulou, J. A. (2010). Understanding the role of neuroscience in brain based products: A guide for educators and consumers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(1), 1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01077.x
  • Teitel, L. (2009). Improving teaching and learning through instructional rounds. Harvard Education Letter, 25(3), 1–3. Retrieved from https://wsra.memberclicks.net/assets/Convention/Handouts_2014/c19%20j_maki_improving_teaching_learning_through_instructional_rounds.pdf
  • Thomas, G., & Pring, R. (Eds.). (2004). Evidence-based practice in education. New York, NY: Open University Press.
  • Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, brain, and education science: A comprehensive guide to the new brain-based teaching. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). U.S. Department of Education Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2014–2018. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Ursache, A., & Noble, K. G. (2016). Neurocognitive development in socioeconomic context: Multiple mechanisms and implications for measuring socioeconomic status. Psychophysiology, 53(1), 71–82. doi:10.1111/psyp.12547
  • Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Journal of Educational Research, 36(2), 299–316. doi:10.1080/01411920902919257
  • Varma, S., McCandliss, B. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 140–152. doi:10.3102/0013189X08317687
  • Ward, J. R., & McCotter, S. S. (2004). Reflection as visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 243–257. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.004
  • Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470–477. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20040
  • Willingham, D. T. (2009). Three problems in the marriage of neuroscience and education. Cortex, 45(4), 544–545. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.009
  • Willingham, D. T. (2012). Why does family wealth affect learning? American Educator, 36(1), 33–39.
  • Willingham, D. T., & Lloyd, J. W. (2007). How educational theories can use neuroscientific data. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 140–149. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00014.x
  • Willinsky, J. (2002). Democracy and education: The missing link may be ours. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 367–392. doi:10.17763/haer.72.3.0nj018h638677r24

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.