Preferences, Proximity, and Controlled Choice: Examining Families’ School Choices and Enrollment Decisions in Louisville, Kentucky

References

• Betts, J., Rice, L. A., Zau, A. C., Tang, Y. E., & Koedel, C. R. (2006). Does school choice work? Effects on student integration and achievement. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. (2017 March 15). Push to dismantle school desegregation plan in Louisville appears dead — for now. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2017/03/15/push-to-dismantle-school-desegregation-plan-in-louisville-appears-dead-for-now/
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, B., Eaton, M., Garet, M., S., Miller, L., C., Hikawa, H., & DuBois, P. (2003). Evaluation of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program, 1998 grantees. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary.
   Google Scholar
• DeBray, E., McDermott, K., Frankenberg, E., & Blankenship, A. (2015). Lessons from a federal grant for school diversity: Tracing a theory of change and implementation of local policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 83. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1999
   Google Scholar
• Diem, S., Frankenberg, E., & Cleary, C. (2015). Factors that influence school board policymaking: The political context of diversity in urban-suburban districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 712–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E. (2011). Integration after Parents Involved: What does research suggest about available options? In E. Frankenberg, & E. DeBray (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 53–74). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E. (2013). The role of residential segregation in contemporary school segregation. Education and Urban Society, 45(5), 548–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E. (2017). Assessing segregation under a new generation of controlled choice policies. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1_suppl), 219S–2250.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., Kotok, S., Schafft, K. A., & Mann, B. (2017). Exploring school choice and the consequences for student racial segregation within Pennsylvania’s charter school transfers. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(22), 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., & Le, C. Q. (2009). The post-Seattle/Louisville challenge: Extra-legal obstacles to integration. Ohio State Law Journal, 69(5), 1015–1072.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., McDermott, K., DeBray, E., & Blankenship, A. (2015). The new politics of diversity: Lessons from a federal technical assistance grant. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 440–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, B., Elmore, R. F., & Orfield, G. (Eds.). (1996). Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, H. (2017). November 27). Confused by your public school choices? Hire a coach. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2017/11/27/551853951/confused-by-your-public-schoolchoices-hire-a-coach
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Accountability Office (GAO) (2016). Better use of information could help agencies identify disparities and address racial discrimination. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, S., & Bielick, S. (2010). Trends in the Use of School Choice: 1993 to 2007 (NCES 2010-004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, J., Kane, T., & Staiger, D. (2010). Heterogeneous preferences and the efficacy of public school choice. Accessed on October 24, 2013 at http://justinehastings.com/research/jh-papers/item/108-hastings-kane-staiger-rev2010
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. C. (2012). The grandchildren of Brown: The long legacy of school desegregation. Unpublished manuscript, Berkeley: Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, D. D., & Page, L. C. (2015). Unitary status and residential choice: Evidence from Charlotte-Mecklenburg. In R. A. Mickelson, S. S. Smith & A. H. Nelson (Eds.), Yesterday, today and tomorrow. School desegregation and resegregation in Charlotte (pp. 101–118). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L., & Welner, K. G. (Eds.). (2007). Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K., DeBray, E., & Frankenberg, E. (2012). How does Parents Involved in Community Schools matter? Legal and political influence in education politics and policy. Teachers College Record, 114(12), 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, K., Frankenberg, E., & Diem, S. (2015). The “post-racial” politics of race: Student assignment policy in three urban school districts. Educational Policy, 29(3), 504–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickelson, R. A., & Nkomo, M. (2012). Integrated schooling, life course outcomes, and social cohesion in multiethnic democratic societies. Review of Research in Education, 36(1), 197–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orfield, G. (2013). Choice theories and the schools. In G. Orfield and E. Frankenberg, Educational Delusions? Why Choice can Deepen Inequality and How to Make Schools Fair (pp. 37–66). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, G., & Frankenberg, E. (2011). Experiencing integration in Louisville: How parents and students see the gains and challenges. Los Angeles: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, G., & Frankenberg, E. (2013). Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make it fair. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. (1980). Breaking down the barriers: New evidence on the impact of metropolitan school desegregation on housing patterns. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pearman, F., II., & Swain, W. (2017). School choice, gentrification, and the variable significance of racial stratification in urban neighborhoods. Sociology of Education, 90(3), 213–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phi Delta Kappan (2017). 2017 Poll. Accessed on December 21, 2017 at http://pdkpoll.org/assets/downloads/PDK-2017-Topline_National_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., Grewal, E. T., Kalogrides, D., & Greenberg, E. (2012). Brown Fades: The end of court-ordered desegregation and the resegregation of American schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(4), 876–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, S., F., & Rhodes, L. (2011). The effects of socioeconomic school integration policies on racial school desegregation. In E. Frankenberg & E. DeBray (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society (pp. 187–207). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., & Yun, J. T. (2005). Integrating neighborhoods, segregating schools: The retreat from school desegregation in the South, 1990-2000. In J. C. Boger and G. Orfield (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 51–69). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M., Stroub, K., Heilig, J., & Volonnino, M. (2012). Achieving diversity in the Parents Involved era: Evidence for geographic integration plans in metropolitan school districts. Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy, 14(1), 65–95.
   Google Scholar
• Roda, A., & Wells, A. S. (2013). School choice policies and racial segregation: Where White parents’ good intentions, anxiety, and privilege collide. American Journal of Education, 119(2), 261–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saporito, S., & Sohoni, D. (2007). Mapping educational inequality: concentrations of poverty among poor and minority students in public schools. Social Forces, 85(3), 1227–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2001). Information and choice in educational privatization. In H. M. Levin (Ed.), Privatizing education: Can the marketplace deliver choice, efficiency, equity, and social cohesion? (pp. 72–103). Cambridge: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2011). School choice as a civil right: The political construction of a claim and implications for school desegregation. In E. Frankenberg & E. DeBray (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 32–51). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Hawley, G. (2016). When the fences come down: Twenty-first-century lessons from metropolitan school desegregation. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, A. S., & Crain, R. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 531–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, A. S., Warner, M., & Grzesikowski, C. (2013). The story of meaningful school choice: Lessons from interdistrict transfer plans. In G. Orfield and E. Frankenberg, In Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair (pp. 187–218). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, T. (1996). Student assignment survey: Summary of findings. Louisville, KY: Wilkerson Associates.
   Google Scholar