Problem Solving and Teaching How to Solve Problems in Technology-Rich Contexts

References

• Akcaoglu, M. (2016). Design and implementation of the game-design and learning program. TechTrends, 60(2), 114–123. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0022-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcaoglu, M., & Green, L. S. (2019). Teaching systems thinking through game design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9596-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcaoglu, M., Gutierrez, A. P., Hodges, C. B., & Sonnleitner, P. (2017). Game design as a complex problem solving process. In R. Zheng (Ed.), Handbook of research on serious games for educational applications (pp. 217–233). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0513-6.ch010
   Google Scholar
• Akcaoglu, M., & Koehler, M. J. (2014). Cognitive outcomes from the game-design and learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education, 75, 72–81. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading With Technology, 38(6), 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. doi:10.1145/1929887.1929905
   Google Scholar
• Castro, A. J., Kelly, J., & Shih, M. (2010). Resilience strategies for new teachers in high-needs areas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 622–629. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching-Huei, C., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2007). The effect of web-based question prompts on scaffolding knowledge integration and ill-structured problem-solving. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 359–375. doi:10.1080/15391523.2007.10782487
   Google Scholar
• De Simone, C. (2008). Problem-based learning: A framework for prospective teachers’ pedagogical problem solving. Teacher Development, 12(3), 179–191. doi:10.1080/13664530802259206
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M. (1980). The conditions of leaning. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. doi:10.1007/bf02504836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 393–416. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, D., & Richardson, C. (2017). Teachers are designers: Addressing problems of practice in education. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2), 60–64. doi:10.1177/0031721717734192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. doi:10.1007/bf02299613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. doi:10.1007/bf02300500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. E. (2016). Teaching as designing: Preparing pre-service teachers for adaptive teaching. Theory into Practice, 55(3), 197–206. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1176812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale, U., Akcaoglu, M., Cullen, T., Goh, D., Devine, L., Calvert, N., & Grise, K. (2018). Computational what? Relating computational thinking to teaching. TechTrends, 62(6), 574–584. doi:10.1007/s11528-018-0290-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale, U., & Whitehouse, P. (2012). Structuring video cases to support future teachers’ problem-solving. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3), 175–202. doi:10.1080/15391523.2012.10782586
   Google Scholar
• Koc, Y., Peker, D., & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: An assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 25(8), 1158–1168. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. In M. R. Panigrahi (Ed.), ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book (pp. 2–7). Vancouver, Canada: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of design dispositions, lesson design practices, and their relationships with technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 378–391. doi:10.1080/1359866x.2014.941280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Mathematics, teaching, and multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Maistre, C., & Paré, A. (2010). Whatever it takes: How beginning teachers learn to survive. Teaching & Teacher Education, 26(3), 559–564. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., … Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 32–37. doi:10.1145/1929887.1929902
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26(1), 49–63. doi:10.1023/A:1003088013286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (2006). Problem solving. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 287–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. doi:10.4324/9780203874790.ch13
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. (2018). Revised version of TPACK image. Retrieved from https://punyamishra.com/2018/09/10/the-tpack-diagram-gets-an-upgrade/
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2007 (pp. 2214–2226). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Too cool for school? No way! Using the TPACK framework: You can have your hot tools and teach with them, too. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36, 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13398
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in preservice education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299. doi:10.1080/09500690802186993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2015). In search of a teacher education curriculum: Appropriating a design lens to solve problems of practice. Educational Technology, 55(6), 3–14. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430419
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pitton, D. (2010). Developing preservice problem-solving skills through case studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub. Group.
   Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies for assessing and improving preservice teachers’ instructional decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52–67. doi:10.1177/0022487108328486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shambaugh, R. N., & Magliaro, S. (1997). Mastering the possibilities: A process approach to instructional design. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. doi:10.1002/9781119176589
   Google Scholar
• Shambaugh, R. N., & Magliaro, S. (2006). Instructional design: A systematic approach for reflective practice. Boston, MA: Pearson College Division.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., Barry, A., & Mahlios, M. (2008). Preservice teachers’ metaphors of teaching in relation to literacy beliefs. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 35–50. doi:10.1080/13540600701837632
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. (2001). Principled pluralism for adaptive flexibility in teaching and learning to read. In R. F. Flippo (Ed.), Reading researchers in search of common ground (pp. 92–97). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Szesztay, M. (2004). Teachers’ ways of knowing. ELT Journal: English Language Teachers Journal, 58(2), 129–136. doi:10.1093/elt/58.2.129
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. (2006). How different video club designs support teachers in “learning to notice”. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(4), 125–135. doi:10.1080/10402454.2006.10784548
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Hartley, K. (2003). Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 105–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, M. C., & Alesandrini, K. (1990). Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 489–502. doi:10.2307/1162933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar