If You Don’t Know Where You’re Going, You Might End Up Where You’re Headed! Teachers’ Visions Transforming Praxis Through Agency

References

• Akos, P. (2005). Advice and student agency in the transition to middle school. Research in Middle Level Education, 27(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2004.11658169
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1995). Education and power. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M. (2013). Rereading comprehension pedagogies: Toward a dialogic teaching ethic that honors student sensemaking. Dialogic Pedagogy, 1, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2013.9
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the life course: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
   Google Scholar
• Blume, J. (1972). Tales of a fourth grade nothing. Puffin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 61–100). American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Kappes, L., & Aspen Institute. (2012). Implementing the Common Core State Standards: A primer on “close reading of text.” Aspen Institute. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED541433.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. (2015). Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15621543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B. (2012). Methodological considerations for studying identities in school science: An anthropological approach. In M. Varelas (Ed.), Identity construction and science education research: Learning, teaching, and being in multiple contexts (pp. 9–26). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hilger, N., Saez, E., Whitmore Schanzenbach, D., & Yagan, D. (2011). How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from Project Star. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1593–1660. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. A. (1987). Instructional alignment: Searching for a magic bullet. Educational Researcher, 16(8), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175370
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. (2010). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, R. D. (2012). Deep engagement as a complex system: Identity, learning power, and authentic inquiry. In S. L. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 675–694). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G. (2005). Developing metacognitive teachers: Visioning and the expert’s changing role in teacher education and professional development. In S. Israel (Ed.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 299–314). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G., Miller, S. D., Parsons, S. A., & Meloth, M. (2009). Teachers as metacognitive professionals. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 240–256). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & D’Arcy, C. (2004). Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach. Educational Review, 56(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031910410001693236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B. B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flake, S. (2007). The Skin I’m In. Jump at the Sun/Hyperion Paperback for Children.
   Google Scholar
• Haberman, M. (1991). Pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K. (2003). Learning to hope, or hoping to learn: The role of vision in the early professional lives of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102238657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K. (2008). “If you don’t know where you are going, any path will do”: The role of teachers’ visions in teachers’ career paths. The New Educator, 4(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476880701829184
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, W. (2007). Crossing the Wire. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Agency and identity in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (2001). History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. School of American Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, G., & Johnston, P. (2015). Engaged reading as collaborative transformative practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(3), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X15619731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivey, G., & Johnston, P. H. (2013). Engagement with young adult literatures: Outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. B. (2003). Education reform as if student agency mattered: Academic microcultures and student identity. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(8), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308400807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H. (2012). Opening minds: Using language to change lives. Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H., Champeau, K., Hartwig, A., Helmer, S., Komar, M., Krueger, T., & McCarthy, L. (2020). Engaging literate minds: Developing children’s social, emotional, and intellectual Lives, K-3. Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H., Woodside-Jiron, H., & Day, J. (2001). Teaching and learning literate epistemologies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Learned, J. E. (2016). “The behavior kids”: Examining the conflation of youth reading difficulty and behavior problem positioning among school institutional contexts. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1271–1309. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216667545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Enciso, P., & Moje, E. B. (Eds.). (2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 812–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. D., & Miller, S. D. (2017). Self-regulation and reading comprehension: Moving beyond the individual’s cognition in regulated learning. In S. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 293–315). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D. (1995). Teachers’ responses to test-driven accountability pressures: “If I change, will my scores drop?” Reading Research and Instruction, 34(4), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079509558190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D. (2003). How high and low challenge tasks affect motivation and learning: Implications for struggling learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308209
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., Adkins, T., & Hooper, M. L. (1993). Why teachers select specific literacy assignments and students’ reactions to them. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969309547802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., & Duffy, G. G. (2006). Are we crazy to keep doing this?. Reading Today, 24(3), 18.
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. I. S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 213–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_6
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., Malloy, J. A., Vaughn, M., & La Croix, L. (2014). A Longitudinal study of literacy teacher visioning: Traditional program graduates and Teach For America Corps members. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(2), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2013.868561
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Hiebert, E. H. (2013). Understanding the Common Core State Standards. In L. M. Morrow, K. K. Wixson, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Teaching with the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts, Grades 3-5 (pp. 1–21). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the test? Helping all students achieve. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2007). On formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students’ independence reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 384–419. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sameroff, A. (2009). The transactional model. In A. Sameroff (Ed.), The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other (pp. 3–21). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11877-001
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199–201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. (2009). Teaching–learning and development as activist projects of historical Becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903406266
   Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. (2012). Personhood: An activist project of historical becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Tudge, J., & Scrimsher, S. (2003). Lev S. Vygotsky on education: A cultural-historical, interpersonal, and individual approach to development. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 207–228). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M. (2020). What is student agency and why is it needed now more than ever?. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., & Parsons, S. A. (2013). Adaptive teachers as innovators: Instructional adaptations opening spaces for enhanced literacy learning. Language Arts, 91(2), 81–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24575032
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Blackwell. ( Original work published 1935)
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2011). Motive and motivation in learning to teach. In D. M. McInnerny, R. A. Walker, G. A. Liem, D. M. McInnerny, R. A. Walker, & G. A. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward (Vol. 10, pp. 87–107). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P., & Binici, S. (2015). Dialogue-intensive pedagogies for promoting reading comprehension: What we know, what we need to know. In L. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 35–48). AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A., & Son, E. H. (2010). A dialogic turn in research on learning and teaching to comprehend. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Joje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 359–387). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, P. (1994). Collaborating in historical ethnography: Researching critical events in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(4), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839940070402
   Google Scholar