You Get What You Pay For: Why We Need to Invest in Strategic Compensation Reform

References

• Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sanders, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in Chicago high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/508733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atteberry, A., & LaCour, S. (2019). Testing the Denver ProComp theory of action: Evidence on intended mechanisms for shaping the teacher workforce and student outcomes (Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Balch, R., & Springer, M. G. (2015). Performance pay, test scores, and student learning objectives. Economics of Education Review, 44, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, M., Imberman, S. A., & Lovenheim, M. F. (2015). Achievement effects of individual performance incentives in a teacher merit pay tournament. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Brownback, A., & Sadoff, S. (2020). Improving College Instruction through Incentives. The Journal of Political Economy, 128(8), 2925–2975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010366173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, R., Wragg, T., Haynes, G., & Wragg, C. (2002). Performance-related pay and the teaching profession: A review of the literature. Research Papers in Education, 17(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520110102534
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. The American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, H., Speroni, C., Hermann, M., Hallgren, K., Burkander, P., Wellington, A., & Warner, E. (2017). Evaluation of the teacher incentive fund: Final report on implementation and impacts of pay-for-performance across four years. Mathematica.
   Google Scholar
• Chingos, M. M., & Peterson, P. E. (2011). It’s easier to pick a good teacher than to train one: Familiar and new results on the correlates of teacher effectiveness. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778–820. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XLI.4.778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, S. (2019). What Do Classroom Observations Tell Us About Student Success? Capturing the Impact of Teachers Using At-Scale Classroom Observation Scores. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Institutional Repository.
   Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G. (2004). Prospects in the academic labor market for economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330041371312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, L., & Sass, T. R. (2017). Teacher quality and teacher mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 12(3), 396–418. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folland, S., Goodman, A. C., & Stano, M. (2006). The economics of health and health care (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, R. G. (2013). Teacher incentives and student achievement: Evidence from New York City public schools. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16850
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, R. G., Levitt, S. D., List, J., & Sadoff, S. (2018). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18237
   Google Scholar
• Fulbeck, E. S. (2014). Teacher mobility and financial incentives: A descriptive analysis of Denver’s ProComp. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713503185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2007). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? National Board certification as a signal of effective teaching. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.1.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Brewer, D., & Anderson, D. (1999). A three-way error components analyses of educational productivity. Education Economics, 7(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645299900000018
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15592622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2016). Inconvenient truth? Do CBAs help explain the mobility of teachers within school districts? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(4), 848–880. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Quince, V., & Theobald, R. (2017). Has it always been this way? Tracing the evolution of teacher quality gaps in U.S. public schools. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217733445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., & Walch, J. (2012). Strategic pay reform: A student outcomes-based evaluation of Denver’s ProComp teacher pay initiative. Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonring, P., Teske, P., & Jupp, B. (2007). Pay-for-performance teacher compensation: An inside view of Denver’s ProComp plan. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S., & Turner, L. (2011). Does whole-school performance pay improve student learning? Evidence from the New York City schools Education Next, 11(2), 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, P. (2019, February). Teacher merit pay is a bad idea. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/petergreene/2019/02/09/teacher-merit-pay-is-a-bad-idea/#5f3e210f4ffb
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input-based resource policies. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F64–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(95)90392-L
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J., O’Brien, D., & Rivkin, S. G. (2005). The market for teacher quality (NBER Working Paper 11154). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). How to improve the supply of high-quality teachers (Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 7-25). Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2008). The effects of NBPTS-certified teachers on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality, and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey-Beavis, O. (2003). Performance-based rewards for teachers: A literature review, UK. http://www.academia.edu/download/41008714/types_of_rewards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, T., & List, J. A. (2012). The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Management science, 58(12), 2151–2167. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houck, E. A. (2010). Teacher quality and school resegregation: A resource allocation case study. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760802630210
   Google Scholar
• Imazeki, J. (2005). Teacher salaries and teacher attrition. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imberman, S. A., & Lovenheim, M. F. (2015). Incentive strength and teacher productivity: Evidence from a group-based teacher incentive pay system. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. B. (2018). What do test scores miss? The importance of teacher effects on non-test score outcomes. The Journal of Political Economy, 126(5), 2072–2107. https://doi.org/10.1086/699018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, B., Lefgren, L., & Sims, D. P. (2010). The persistence of teacher-induced learning. The Journal of Human Resources, 45(4), 915–943. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2010.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaschik, S. (2016, March 28). What you teach is what you earn. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/03/28/study-finds-continued-large-gaps-faculty-salaries-based-discipline
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M. (1986). Incentives for teachers: What motivates, what matters? Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(23), 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X86022003003
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M., Berg, J. H., & Donaldson, M. L. (2005). Who stays in teaching and why: A review of the literature on teacher retention. NRTA Educator Support Network.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A. (2019). Teacher effects on complex cognitive skills and socio-emotional competencies. The Journal of Human Resources, 54(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.54.1.0916.8265R3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M., Blazer, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., Papay, J. P., Johnson, S. M., Charner Laird, M., Ng, M., & Reinhorn, S. (2015). Educating amid uncertainty: The organizational supports teachers need to serve students in high-poverty, urban schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 753–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15607617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F., & Sorenson, L. C. (2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024001037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., Neckermann, S., & Sadoff, S. (2016). The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(4), 183–219. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20130358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 44–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje8003_4
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., Kalogrides, D., & Beteille, T. (2012). Effective schools: Teacher hiring, assignment, development, and retention. Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 269–304. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Springer, M., McCaffrey, D., Yuan, K., & Epstein, J. (2011). A big apple for educators: New York City’s experiment with schoolwide performance bonuses: Final evaluation report. Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (2009). Collective bargaining and the performance of the public schools. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, C., & Wiswall, M. (2011). Risk aversion and support for merit pay: Theory and evidence from Minnesota’s Q-Comp program. Education Finance & Policy, 6(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Inspector General. (2011). Department’s implementation of the Teacher Incentive Fund Grant Program: Final audit report. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J., & Kraft, M. A. (2015). Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement. Journal of Public Economics, 130, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, L., Nguyen, T., & Springer, M. G. (2018). Teacher merit pay (Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Podgursky, M., & Springer, M. G. (2007). Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 909–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podgursky, M., & Springer, M. G. (2011). Teacher compensation systems in the United States K-12 public school system. National Tax Journal, 64(1), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2011.1.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding, C. R., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Leaving School Early: An Examination of Novice Teachers' Within- and End-of-Year Turnover. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 204–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218790542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G. (1998). Management professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, A. (2019, March 12). Teachers need more pay, not merit pay. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2019/03/12/teachers-need-more-pay-not-merit-pay.html
   Google Scholar
• Scafidi, B., Sjoquist, D. L., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2007). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 26(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, N. S., & Johnson, S. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojourner, A. J., Mykerezi, E., & West, K. L. (2014). Teacher pay reform and productivity panel data evidence from adoptions of Q-Comp in Minnesota. The Journal of Human Resources, 49(4), 945–981. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2014.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G. (2009). Performance incentives: Their growing impact on American K-12 education. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., & Balch, R. (2010). Design components of incentive pay programs in the education sector. In Teacher incentives and stimuli (pp. 65–101). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., Ballou, D., Hamilton, L., Le, V.-N., Lockwood, J. R., McCaffrey, D. F., Pepper, M., & Stecher, B. M. (2012a). Teacher pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the project on incentives in teaching (POINT). http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED518378
   Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., Lewis, J. L., Ehlert, M. W., Podgursky, M. J., Crader, G. D., Taylor, L. L., Gronberg, T. J., Jansen, D. W., Lopez, O. S., & Stuit, D. A. (2011). District Awards for Teacher Excellence (DATE) Program: Final evaluation report. National Center on Performance Incentives. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED538372
   Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., Lewis, J. L., Podgursky, M. J., Ehlert, M. W., Taylor, L. L., Lopez, O. S., & Peng, A. (2009a). Governor’s Educator Excellence Grant (GEEG) program: Year three evaluation report. National Center on Performance Incentives.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., Pane, J. F., Le, V.-N., McCaffrey, D. F., Burns, S. F., Hamilton, L. S., & Stecher, B. (2012b). Team pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the Round Rock Pilot Project on team incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712439094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., Podgursky, M. J., Springer, C., Hamilton, L. S., Lopez, O. S., Peng, A. X., & Stecher, B. M. (2009b). Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) program.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., Swain, W. A., & Rodriguez, L. A. (2016). Effective teacher retention bonuses: Evidence from Tennessee. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 38(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715609687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., & Taylor, L. L. (2016). Designing incentives for public school teachers: Evidence from a Texas incentive pay program. Journal of Education Finance, 41(3), 344–381. https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2016.0001
   Google Scholar
• Steele, J., Pepper, M. J., Springer, M. G., & Lockwood, J. R. (2015). The distribution and mobility of effective teachers. Economics of Education Review, 48, 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, V. (2019, February 12). Performance pay drove Denver teachers to strike—and it is failing in other districts, too. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/02/12/performance-pay-drove-denver-teachers-strike-it-is-failing-other-districts-too-north-carolina-teacher-explains-why-it-doesnt-work/?utm_term=.773e2e149628
   Google Scholar
• Swain, W. A., Rodriguez, L. A., & Springer, M. G. (2019). Selective retention bonuses for highly effective teachers in high poverty schools: Evidence from Tennessee. Economics of Education Review, 68, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umansky, I. (2005). A literature review of teacher quality and incentives: Theory and evidence. In Emiliana Vegas (Ed.), Incentives to improve teaching: Lessons from Latin America (Vol. 21). Washington DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7265
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2012). 2012 teacher incentive fund invites districts to pursue a new vision for human capital through stronger evaluations and greater professional opportunities. Author. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/2012-teacher-incentive-fund-invites-districts-pursue-new-vision-human-capital-through-stronger-evaluations-and-greater-professional-opportunities
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Viscardi, D. (2014). The teacher pay for performance phenomenon [ Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Seton Hall University.
   Google Scholar
• Volpp, K. G., Leslie, J. K., Troxel, A. B., Norton, L., Fassbender, J., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss. Journal of the American Medication Association, 300(22), 2631–2637. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2008.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, M. A., Dixon, B. L., & Greene, J. P. (2012). Observed characteristics and teacher quality: Impacts of sample selection on a value added model. Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K., Le, V., McCaffrey, D. F., Marsh, J. A., Hamilton, L., Stecher, B., & Springer, M. G. (2013). Incentive pay programs do not affect teacher motivation or reported practices: Results from three randomized studies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712462625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar