Approximations of the Optimal Importance Density Using Gaussian Particle Flow Importance Sampling

References

• Andrieu, C., Doucet, A., and Holenstein, R. (2010), “Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 72, 269–342.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Shalom, Y., and Li, X. R. (1995), Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques, Storrs, CT: Yaakov Bar-Shalom.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, R. H., and Stewart, G. W. (1972), “Solution of the Matrix Equation ax + xb = c,” Communications of the ACM, 15, 820–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, P., and Godsill, S. (2013), “Particle Filtering With Progressive Gaussian Approximations to the Optimal Importance Density,” in 5th IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP), pp. 360--363.
   Google Scholar
• Cappé, O., Godsill, S., and Moulines, E. (2007), “An Overview of Existing Methods and Recent Advances in Sequential Monte Carlo,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 95, 899–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daum, F., and Huang, J. (2008), “Particle Flow for Nonlinear Filters With Log-Homotopy,” Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering, 6969, 696918–696918-12.
   Google Scholar
• Daum, F. (2011), “Particle Degeneracy: Root Cause and Solution,” Proceedings of SPIE, 8050, 80500W--80500W-11.
   Google Scholar
• Daum, F. (2013), “Particle Flow With Non-Zero Diffusion for Nonlinear Filters,” in Proceedings of SPIE, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition XXII, 8745, 87450P--87450P-13.
   Google Scholar
• Daum, F., Huang, J., Krichman, M., and Kohen, T. (2009), “Seventeen Dubious Methods to Approximate the Gradient for Nonlinear Filters With Particle Flow,” in Proceedings of SPIE, eds. O. E. Drummond, and R. D. Teichgraeber, Bellingham, WA: SPIE, pp. 74450V–74450V-9.
   Google Scholar
• Del Moral, P., Doucet, A., and Jasra, A. (2006), “Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 68, 411–436.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher, J., Blake, A., and Reid, I. (2000), “Articulated Body Motion Capture by Annealed Particle Filtering,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2, 126–133.
   Google Scholar
• Douc, R., Cappe, O., and Moulines, E. (2005), “Comparison of Resampling Schemes for Particle Filtering,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium. Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, pp. 64--69.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, A., Godsill, S., and Andrieu, C. (2000), “On Sequential Monte Carlo Sampling Methods for Bayesian Filtering,” Statistics and Computing, 10, 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, A., and Johansen, A. M. (2009), “A Tutorial on Particle Filtering and Smoothing: Fifteen Years Later,” in The Oxford Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering, eds. D. Crisan, and B. Rozovsky, pp. 656--704, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, J., Potthoff, J., Schnörr, C., Rosenhahn, B., and Seidel, H. P. (2007), “Interacting and Annealing Particle Filters: Mathematics and a Recipe for Applications,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 28, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and Meng, X. L. (1998), “Simulating Normalizing Constants: From Importance Sampling to Bridge Sampling to Path Sampling,” Statistical Science, 13, 163–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geweke, J. (1989), “Bayesian Inference in Econometric Models Using Monte Carlo Integration,” Econometrica, 57, 1317–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilks, W. R., and Berzuini, C. (2001), “Following a Moving Target — Monte Carlo Inference for Dynamic Bayesian Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 63, 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Godsill, S., and Clapp, T. (2001), “Improvement Strategies for Monte Carlo Particle Filters,” in Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice, eds. A. Doucet, N. de Freitas, and N. Gordon, pp. 139--158, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, N. J., Salmond, D. J., and Smith, A. F.M. (1993), “Novel Approach to Nonlinear/Non-Gaussian Bayesian State Estimation,” IEE Proceedings F, Radar and Signal Processing, 140, 107–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagmar, J., Jirstrand, M., Svensson, L., and Morelande, M. (2011), “Optimal Parameterization of Posterior Densities Using Homotopy,” in 14th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), pp. 1--8.
   Google Scholar
• Hanebeck, U. D., and Feiermann, O. (2003), “Progressive Bayesian Estimation for Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems: The Filter Step for Scalar Measurements and Multidimensional States,” in 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Vol. 111), pp. 5366–5371.
   Google Scholar
• Hanebeck, U., and Steinbring, J. (2012), “Progressive Gaussian Filtering,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.0133.
   Google Scholar
• Hol, J. D., Schon, T. B., and Gustafsson, F. (2006), “On Resampling Algorithms for Particle Filters,” in IEEE Nonlinear Statistical Signal Processing Workshop, pp. 79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, G. (1996), “Monte Carlo Filter and Smoother for Non-Gaussian Nonlinear State Space Models,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, A., Liu, J. S., and Wong, W. H. (1994), “Sequential Imputations and Bayesian Missing Data Problems,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 278–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S. (2001), Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, R. M. (2001), “Annealed Importance Sampling,” Statistics and Computing, 11, 125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øksendal, B. (2003), Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction With Applications, New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Oudjane, N., and Musso, C. (2000), “Progressive Correction for Regularized Particle Filters,” in 3rd International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) (Vol. 111), pp. 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, S. (2011), “A Dynamical Systems Framework for Intermittent Data Assimilation,” BIT Numerical Mathematics, 51, 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, S. (2012), “A Gaussian-Mixture Ensemble Transform Filter,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 138, 222–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, S. (2013), “A Guided Sequential Monte Carlo Method for the Assimilation of Data Into Stochastic Dynamical Systems,” in Recent Trends in Dynamical Systems, New York: Springer, pp. 205–220.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, T., Gustafsson, F., and Nordlund, P. J. (2005), “Marginalized Particle Filters for Mixed Linear/Nonlinear State-Space Models,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53, 2279–2289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shampine, L., and Reichelt, M. (1997), “The MATLAB ODE Suite,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 18, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Merwe, R., Doucet, A., Freitas, N., and Wan, E. (2000), “The Unscented Particle Filter,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 13, 1--7.
   Google Scholar