Design and Analysis of the Randomized Response Technique

REFERENCES

• Abernathy, J.R., Greenberg, B.G., and Horvitz, D.G. (1970), “Estimates of Induced Abortion in Urban North Carolina,” Demography, 7, 19–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abul-Ela, A.-L. A., Greenberg, G.G., and Horvitz, D.G. (1967), “A Multi-Proportions Randomized Response Model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 990–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, G. (2014), “Who Informs on their Neighbors in Civil War? Evidence from Nigeria.” Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, G., Imai, K., and Zhou, Y.-Y. (2015a), “Replication Data for: Design and Analysis of the Randomized Response Technique. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AIO5BR. The Dataverse Network.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, G., Zhou, Y.-Y., and Imai, K. (2015b), “rr: Statistical Methods for the Randomized Response,” Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rr.
   Google Scholar
• Boruch, R.F. (1971), “Assuring Confidentiality of Responses in Social Research: A Note on Strategies,” American Sociologist, 6, 308–311.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, P.D., and Moran, M.A. (1988), “Estimating Proportions From Randomized Response Data Using the em Algorithm,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 964–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaloupka, M.Y. (1985), “Application of the Randomized Response Technique to Marine Park Management: An Assessment of Permit Compliance,” Environmental Management, 9, 393–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A. (2001), “Using Randomized Response From a Complex Survey to Estimate a Sensitive Proportion in a Dichotomous Finite Population,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 94, 37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A. (2011), Randomized Response and Indirect Questioning Techniques in Surveys, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A., and Saha, A. (2005), “Optional Versus Compulsory Randomized Response Techniques in Complex Surveys,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 135, 516–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, I.-C., Chow, L., and Rider, R.V. (1972), “The Randomized Response Technique as Used in the Taiwan Outcome of Pregnancy Study,” Studies in Family Planning, 3, 265–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofides, T.C. (2005), “Randomized Response Technique for Two Sensitive Characteristics at the Same Time,” Metrika, 62, 53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S.J., and Desharnais, R.A. (1998), “Honest Answers to Embarrassing Questions: Detecting Cheating in the Randomized Response Model,” Psychological Methods, 3, 160–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts, E., and Jann, B. (2011), “Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: Experimental Results for the Randomized Response Technique (RRT) and the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT),” Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 169–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts, E., Jann, B., Krumpal, I., and Näher, A.-F. (2011), “Plagiarism in Student Papers: Prevalence Estimates Using Special Techniques for Sensitive Questions,” Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik), 231, 749–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruyff, M.J., Hout, A., van der Heijden, P.G., and Böckenholt, U. (2007), “Log-Linear Randomized-Response Models Taking Self-Protective Response Behavior Into Account,” Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 266–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, M.G., Pieters, R., and Fox, J.-P. (2010), “Reducing Social Desirability Bias Through Item Randomized Response: An Application to Measure Underreported Desires,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 14–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B. (1977), “Maximum Likelihood From Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J.J., Dwight, S.A., and Hurtz, G.M. (2003), “An Assessment of the Prevalence, Severity, and Verifiability of Entry-Level Applicant Faking Using the Randomized Response Technique,” Human Performance, 16, 81–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, T.A., and Shachtman, R.H. (1975), “On the Relative Efficiency of Randomized Response Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 84–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgell, S.E., Himmelfarb, S., and Duchan, K.L. (1982), “Validity of Forced Responses in a Randomized Response Model,” Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichhorn, B.H., and Hayre, L.S. (1983), “Scrambled Randomized Response Methods for Obtaining Sensitive Quantitative Data,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 7, 307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elffers, H., Van Der Heijden, P., and Hezemans, M. (2003), “Explaining Regulatory Non-Compliance: A Survey Study of Rule Transgression for Two Dutch Instrumental Laws, Applying the Randomized Response Method,” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 409–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler, D.S., and Kleinknecht, R.E. (1977), “Randomized Response Versus Direct Questioning: Two Data-Collection Methods for Sensitive Information,” Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1045–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J.A., and Tracy, P.E. (1984), “Measuring Associations With Randomized Response,” Social Science Research, 13, 188–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J.A. (1986), Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gingerich, D.W. (2010), “Understanding Off-The-Books Politics: Conducting Inference on the Determinants of Sensitive Behavior With Randomized Response Surveys,” Political Analysis, 18, 349–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingerich, D.W., Corbacho, A., Oliveros, V., and Ruiz-Vega, M. (2014), “When to Protect? Using the Crosswise Model to Integrate Protected and Direct Responses in Surveys of Sensitive Behavior.
   Google Scholar
• Goodstadt, M.S., and Gruson, V. (1975), “The Randomized Response Technique: A Test on Drug Use,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 814–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B.G., Abul-Ela, A.-L. A., and Horvitz, D.G. (1969), “The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 520–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B.G., Kuebler Jr, R.R., Abernathy, J.R., and Horvitz, D.G. (1971), “Application of the Randomized Response Technique in Obtaining Quantitative Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, D.W., and Moshagen, M. (2014), “RRreg: Correlation and Regression Analyses for Randomized Response Data,” Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). Available at http://cran.r-project.org/package=RRreg.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelfarb, S. (2008), “The Multi-Item Randomized Response Technique,” Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 495–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höglinger, M., Jann, B., and Diekmann, A. (2014), “Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: An Experimental Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique and the Crosswise Model,” Technical Report, Department of Social Sciences, University of Bern.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A.L., and Krosnik, J.A. (2010), “Measuring Voter Turnout by Using the Randomized Response Technique: Evidence Calling Into Question the Method’s Validity,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 328–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Park, B., and Greene, K.F. (2015), “Using the Predicted Responses From List Experiments as Explanatory Variables in Regression Models,” Political Analysis, 23, 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jann, B. (2011), “RRLOGIT: Stata Module to Estimate Logistic Regression for Randomized Response Data,” available at https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456203.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jann, B., Jerke, J., and Krumpal, I. (2011), “Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model: An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism,” Public Opinion Quarterly, doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchner, A. (2015), “Validating Sensitive Questions: A Comparison of Survey and Register Data,” Journal of Official Statistics, 31, 31–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korndörfer, M., Krumpal, I., and Schmukle, S.C. (2014), “Measuring and Explaining Tax Evasion: Improving Self-Reports Using the Crosswise Model,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumpal, I. (2012), “Estimating the Prevalence of Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism in Germany: A Comparison of Randomized Response and Direct Questioning,” Social Science Research, 41, 1387–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk, A.Y. (1990), “Asking Sensitive Questions Indirectly,” Biometrika, 77, 436–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmi, D.V., and Raghavarao, D. (1992), “A Test for Detecting Untruthful Answering in Randomized Response Procedures,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 31, 387–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, C.W., and Stem, D.E. (1978), “An Empirical Validation of the Randomized Response Technique,” Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 15, 616–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara, D., García, S.G., Ellertson, C., Camlin, C., and Suárez, J. (2006), “The Measure of Induced Abortion Levels in Mexico Using Random Response Technique,” Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara, D., Strickler, J., Olavarrieta, C.D., and Ellertson, C. (2004), “Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico: A Comparison of Four Methodologies,” Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 529–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, W., and Küchenhoff, H. (2013), “simex: Simex- and Mcsimex-Algorithm for Measurement Error Models,” Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). Available at http://cran.r-project.org/package=simex.
   Google Scholar
• Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J., Hox, J.J., and Van Der Heijden, P.G. (2005a), “How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs,” Quality and Quantity, 39, 253–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J., Hox, J.J., Van der Heijden, P.G., and Maas, C.J. (2005b), “Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research Thirty-Five Years of Validation,” Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 319–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locander, W., Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. (1976), “An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response Distortion,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 269–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madigan, F.C., Abernathy, J.R., Herrin, A.N., and Tan, C. (1976), “Purposive Concealment of Death in Household Surveys in Misamis Oriental Province,” Population Studies, 30, 295–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangat, N.S. (1994), “An Improved Randomized Response Strategy,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 56, 93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Mangat, N.S., and Singh, R. (1990), “An Alternative Randomized Response Procedure,” Biometrika, 77, 439–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, J. (1971), “Optimization of the Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 627–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, A. (1987), “Bayes Linear Estimators for Randomized Response Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 580–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, K., and Bek, Y. (1976), “A Comparison of Three Randomized Response Models for Quantitative Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 884–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavarao, D., and Federer, W.T. (1979), “Block Total Response as an Alternative to the Randomized Response Method in Surveys,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 41, 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Reinmuth, J.E., and Geurts, M.D. (1975), “The Collection of Sensitive Information Using a Two-Stage, Randomized Response Model,” Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 12, 402–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, B., Imai, K., and Shapiro, J. (2015), “An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions, American Journal of Political Science.. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12205.
   Google Scholar
• Scheers, N., and Dayton, C.M. (1988), “Covariate Randomized Response Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 969–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, F.A., Keane, A.M., Edwards-Jones, G., Jones, L., Yarnell, R.W., and Jones, J.P. (2012), “Identifying Indicators of Illegal Behaviour: Carnivore Killing in Human-Managed Landscapes,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 804–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbe, J.H., Chorus, A.M., Frank, L.E., Hon, O., and Heijden, P.G. (2014), “Prevalence of Use of Performance Enhancing Drugs by Fitness Centre Members,” Drug Testing and Analysis, 6, 434–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamhane, A.C. (1981), “Randomized Response Techniques for Multiple Sensitive Attributes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 916–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M.T., Tian, G.-L., and Tang, M.-L. (2009), “Sample Surveys With Sensitive Questions: A Nonrandomized Response Approach,” The American Statistician, 63, 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezcan, S., and Omran, A.R. (1981), “Prevalence and Reporting of Induced Abortion in Turkey: Two Survey Techniques,” Studies in Family Planning, 12, 262–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, P.E., and Fox, J.A. (1981), “The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements,” American Sociological Review, 46, 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umesh, U., and Peterson, R.A. (1991), “A Critical Evaluation of the Randomized Response Method: Applications, Validation, and Research Agenda,” Sociological Methods & Research, 20, 104–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, A., and Klugkist, I. (2009), “Accounting for Non-Compliance in the Analysis of Randomized Response Data,” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 51, 353–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, A., van der Heijden, P.G., and Gilchrist, R. (2007), “The Logistic Regression Model With Response Variables Subject to Randomized Response,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 6060–6069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, P.G., and van Gils, G. (1996), “Some Logistic Regression Models for Randomized Response Data,” Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Statistical Modeling, pp. 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, P.G., van Gils, G., Bouts, J., and Hox, J.J. (2000), “A Comparison of Randomized Response, Computer-Assisted Self-Interview, and Face-to-Face Direct Questioning Eliciting Sensitive Information in the Context of Welfare and Unemployment Benefit,” Sociological Methods & Research, 28, 505–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volicer, B.J., and Volicer, L. (1982), “Randomized Response Technique for Estimating Alcohol Use and Noncompliance in Hypertensives,” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 43, 739–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, S.L. (1965), “Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimbush, J.C., and Dalton, D.R. (1997), “Base Rate for Employee Theft: Convergence of Multiple Methods,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 756–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, R.L., and Franklin, L.A. (1979), “Warner’s Randomized Response Model: A Bayesian Approach,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolter, F., and Preisendörfer, P. (2013), “Asking Sensitive Questions: An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Vatextlidation Data,” Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 321–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J.-W., Tian, G.-L., and Tang, M.-L. (2008), “Two New Models for Survey Sampling With Sensitive Characteristic: Design and Analysis,” Metrika, 67, 251–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar