Active Clinical Trials for Personalized Medicine

References

• Allard, W. K., Chen, G., and Maggioni, M. (2012), “Multi-Scale Geometric Methods for Data Sets II: Geometric Multi-Resolution Analysis,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 32, 435–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audibert, J.-Y., and Tsybakov, A. B. (2007), “Fast Learning Rates for Plug-In Classifiers,” The Annals of Statistics, 35, 608–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcan, M.-F., Hanneke, S., and Wortman, J. (2008), “The True Sample Complexity of Active Learning,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Learning Theory, pp. 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, T., Tian, L., Wong, P. H., and Wei, L. (2011), “Analysis of Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial Data for Personalized Treatment Selections,” Biostatistics, 12, 270–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, R. M., and Nowak, R. D. (2008), “Minimax Bounds for Active Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 54, 2339–2353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., Hung, H., Wang, S. J., and Tsong, Y. (2002), “Issues Related to Subgroup Analysis in Clinical Trials,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 12, 347–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dasgupta, S., Monteleoni, C., and Hsu, D. J. (2007), “A General Agnostic Active Learning Algorithm,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 353–360.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, K., Bourke, C., Scott, S., Sunderman, J., and Zheng, Y. (2007), “Bandit-Based Algorithms for Budgeted Learning,” in Proceedings of the 2007 Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 463–468.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, K., Pineau, J., and Murphy, S. (2011a), “Active Learning for Developing Personalized Treatment,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, K. (2011b), “Active Learning for Personalizing Treatment,” in 2011 IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning (ADPRL), pp. 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• DiMasi, J. A., Feldman, L., Seckler, A., and Wilson, A. (2010), “Trends in Risks Associated With New Drug Development: Success Rates for Investigational Drugs,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 87, 272–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, D. M., Daley, D. C., Brigham, G. S., Hodgkins, C. C., Perl, H. I., Garrett, S. B., Doyle, S. R., Floyd, A. S., Knox, P. C., Botero, C., Kelly, T. M., Killeen, T. K., Hayes, C., Kau’i Baumhofer, N., Seamans, C., and Zammarelli, L. (2013), “Stimulant Abuser Groups to Engage in 12-Step: A Multisite Trial in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network,” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44, 103–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. C., Taylor, J. M., and Ruberg, S. J. (2011), “Subgroup Identification From Randomized Clinical Trial Data,” Statistics in Medicine, 30, 2867–2880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, L., Zhu, J., and Murphy, S. (2007), “Variable Selection for Optimal Decision Making,” in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, eds. R. Bellazzi, A. Abu-Hanna, J. Hunter, Berlin: Springer, pp. 149–154.
   Google Scholar
• Hamburg, M., and Collins, F. (2010), “The Path to Personalized Medicine,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 301–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanneke, S. (2011), “Rates of Convergence in Active Learning,” The Annals of Statistics, 39, 333–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, F., and Rosenberger, W. F. (2006), The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., and Laber, E. (2014), “Personalized Evaluation of Biomarker Value: A Cost-Benefit Perspective,” Statistics in Biosciences, 1–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin, I. H., Liu, S., Thall, P. F., and Yuan, Y. (2014), “Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109, 525–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, M. B., Mccullough, J. P., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B., Dunner, D. L., Gelenberg, A. J., Markowitz, J. C., Nemeroff, C. B., Russell, J. M., Thase, M. E., Trivedi, M. H., and Zajecka, J. (2000), “A Comparison of Nefazodone, The Cognitive Behavioral-Analysis System of Psychotherapy, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Chronic Depression,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1462–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltchinskii, V. (2010), “Rademacher Complexities and Bounding the Excess Risk in Active Learning,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 2457–2485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laber, E., Zhao, Y.-Q., Regh, T., Davidian, M., Tsiatis, A., Stanford, J. B., Zeng, D., Song, R., and Kosorok, M. R. (2015), “Sizing a Phase II Trial to Find a Nearly Optimal Personalized Treatment Strategy,” submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Lagakos, S. W. (2006), “The Challenge of Subgroup Analyses-Reporting Without Distorting,” New England Journal of Medicine, 354, 1667–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A. V., Jung, Y.-M., and Maggioni, M. (2009), “Multiscale Estimation of Intrinsic Dimensionality of Data Sets,” in AAAI Fall Symposium: Manifold Learning and Its Applications, pp. 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Madani, O., Lizotte, D. J., and Greiner, R. (2004), “The Budgeted Multi-Armed Bandit Problem,” in Learning Theory, eds. J. Shawe-Taylor and Y. Singer, Berlin: Springer, pp. 643–645.
   Google Scholar
• McGahan, P., Griffith, J., Parente, R., and McLellan, A. (1986), Addiction Severity Index Composite Scores Manual, Philadelphia, PA: Treatment Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Minsker, S. (2012), “Plug-In Approach to Active Learning,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 67–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. A. (2003), “Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 65, 331–366.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, M., and Murphy, S. A. (2011), “Performance Guarantees for Individualized Treatment Rules,” The Annals of Statistics, 39, 1180–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan, H., Madani, O., and Jones, R. (2006), “Active Learning With Feedback on Features and Instances,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 1655–1686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. E., and Nickisch, H. (2010), “Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (GPML) Toolbox,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 3011–3015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. E., and Williams, C. K.I. (2006), Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, H. (1952), “Some Aspects of the Sequential Design of Experiments,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 58, 527–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, J. M. (2004), “Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions,” in Proceedings of the Second Seattle Symposium on Biostatistics, pp. 189–326.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, W. F., and Lachin, J. M. (1993), “The Use of Response-Adaptive Designs in Clinical Trials,” Controlled Clinical Trials, 14, 471–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberger, W. F., Sverdlov, O., and Hu, F. (2012), “Adaptive Randomization for Clinical Trials,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 22, 719–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, N., and Simon, R. (2013), “Adaptive Enrichment Designs for Clinical Trials,” Biostatistics, 14, 613–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, E. (2005), “Personalized Medicine Prompts Push to Redesign Clinical Trials,” Nature Medicine, 11, 462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsybakov, A. (2004), “Optimal Aggregation of Classifiers in Statistical Learning,” The Annals of Statistics, 32, 135–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, A. J., Kattan, M. W., and Sargent, D. J. (2007), “Method for Evaluating Prediction Models That Apply the Results of Randomized Trials to Individual Patients,” Trials, 8, 14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.-J., Hung, H., and O’Neill, R. T. (2009), “Adaptive Patient Enrichment Designs in Therapeutic Trials,” Biometrical Journal, 51, 358–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Tsiatis, A. A., Laber, E. B., and Davidian, M. (2012), “A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes,” Biometrics, 68, 1010–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. Q., Zeng, D., Rush, A. J., and Kosorok, M. R. (2012), “Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning,” Journal of American Statistical Association, 107, 1106–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar