Rejoinder

References

• Airoldi, E. M., Anderson, A. G., Fienberg, S. E., and Skinner, K. K. (2006), “Who Wrote Ronald Reagan's Radio Addresses?” Bayesian Analysis, 1, 289–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airoldi, E. M., Blei, D. M., Erosheva, E. A., and Fienberg, S. E. (eds.) (2014), Handbook of Mixed Membership Models and Their Applications, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall / CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Airoldi, E. M., Erosheva, E. A., Fienberg, S. E., Joutard, C. J., Love, T. M., and Shringarpure, S. (2010), “Reconceptualizing the Classification of PNAS Articles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 20899–20904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. (2012), “Probabilistic Topic Models,” Communications of the ACM, 55, 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D., and Lafferty, J. (2007), “A Correlated Topic Model of Science,” Annals of Applied Statistics, 1, 17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D., Ng, A., and Jordan, M. (2003), “Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
   Google Scholar
• De Morgan, A. (1872), Budget of Paradoxes, Green: London Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and Thisted, R. (1976), “Estimating the Number of Unseen Species: How Many Words Did Shakespeare Know?” Biometrika, 63, 435–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erosheva, E. A., Fienberg, S. E., and Lafferty, J. (2004), “Mixed-Membership Models of Scientific Publications,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 5220–5227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. D., Yang, Y., Rose, T. G., and Li, F. (2004), “RCV1: A New Benchmark Collection for Text Categorization Research,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, 361–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendenhall, T. C. (1887), “The Characteristic Curves of Composition,” Science, 11, 237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., Newman, E. B., and Friedman, E. A. (1958), “Length-Frequency Statistics for Written English,” Information and Control, 1, 370–389.
   Google Scholar
• Mimno, D., Wallach, H., Talley, E., Leenders, M., and McCallum, A. (2011), “Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models,” in Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Edinburgh, UK: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 262–272.
   Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F., and Wallace, D. L. (1963), “Inference in an Authorship Problem,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 275–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F. (1964), Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F. (1984), Applied Bayesian and Classical Inference: The Case of “The Federalist” Papers, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M., Stewart, B., and Airoldi, E. M. (2016), “A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111, 988–1003.
   Google Scholar
• Sandhaus, E. (2008), “The New York Times Annotated Corpus,” Linguistic Data Consortium. Available at http://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2008T19.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, H., Mimno, D., and McCallum, A. (2009a), “Rethinking LDA: Why Priors Matter,” in Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), eds. Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. D. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, and A. Culotta, Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc., pp. 1973–1981.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, H., Murray, I., Salakhutdinov, R., and Mimno, D. (2009b), “Evaluation Methods for Topic Models,” in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), New York: Association of Computer Machinery, pp. 1105–1112.
   Google Scholar
• Yule, U. (1944), The Statistical Study of Literary Vocabulary, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1932), Selected Studies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, J. Y., and Adams, R. P. (2012), “Priors for Diversity in Generative Latent Variable Models,” Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, 2996–3004.
   Google Scholar