References
- Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., and Munafo, M. R. (2013), “Power Failure: Why Small Sample Size Undermines the Reliability of Neuroscience,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365–376.
- Carlin, J. B. (2016), “Is Reform Possible Without a Paradigm Shift?” The American Statistician.
- Gelman, A. (2014), “Confirmationist and Falsificationist Paradigms of Science,” Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science Blog, 5 Sept. Available at http://andrewgelman.com/2014/09/05/confirmationist-falsificationist-paradigms-science/
- ——— (2016), “The Problems With p-Values are Not Just With p-Values,” The American Statistician, Available at http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
- Gelman, A., and Carlin, J. B. (2014), “Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 641–651.
- Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., and Rubin, D. B. (2013), Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.), London: Chapman and Hall.
- Gelman, A., Goel, S., Rivers, D., and Rothschild, D. (2016), “The Mythical Swing Voter,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11, 103–130.
- Gelman, A., Hill, J., and Yajima, M. (2012), “Why We (Usually) Don’t Have to Worry About Multiple Comparisons,” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5, 189–211.
- Gelman, A., and Loken, E. (2014), “The Statistical Crisis in Science,” American Scientist, 102, 460–465.
- Gelman, A., and Rubin, D. B. (1995), “Avoiding Model Selection in Bayesian Social Research,” Sociological Methodology, 25, 165–173.
- Greenland, S., and Poole, C. (2013), “Living With P-Values: Resurrecting a Bayesian Perspective on Frequentist Statistics,” Epidemiology, 24, 62–68.
- Jeffreys, H. (1961), Theory of Probability (3rd ed.), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Kruschke, J. K. (2013), “Bayesian Estimation Supersedes the t Test,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 573–603.
- Lockhart, R., Taylor, J., Tibshirani, R. J., and Tibshirani, R. (2013), “A Significance Test for the Lasso,” Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.
- Loken, E., and Gelman, A. (2017), “Measurement Error and the Replication Crisis,” Science, 355, 584–585.
- Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Verhagen, J., and Wagenmakers, E. J. (2014), “Why Hypothesis Tests are Essential for Psychological Science,” Psychological Science, 25, 1289–1290.
- Morris, C. N. (1987), “Comment,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 131–133.
- Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., and Iverson, G. (2009), “Bayesian t Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237.
- Simmons, J., Nelson, L., and Simonsohn, U. (2011), “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allow Presenting Anything as Significant,” Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
- Wasserstein, R. L., and Lazar, N. A. (2016), “The ASA’s Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose,” The American Statistician, 70, 129–133.