Joint Indirect Standardization When Only Marginal Distributions are Observed in the Index Population

References

• Abadie, A., Diamond, A., and Hainmueller, J. (2010), “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 493–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, A., Fienberg, S., Louis, T., Normand, S., Stukel, T., and Utts, J. (2011), “Statistical Issues in Assessing Hospital Performance,” Committee of Presidents of Statistical Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Y. (1967), “Multidimensional Contingency Tables: Cell Estimates,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, C., and Morris, C. (1997), “Improving the Statistical Approach to Health Care Provider Profiling,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 764–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W., and Stephan, F. (1940), “On a Least Squares Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table When the Expected Marginal Totals are Known,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 427–444.
   Google Scholar
• Deville, J., and Särndal, C. (1992), “Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 376–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville, J., Särndal, C., and Sautory, O. (1993), “Generalized Raking Procedures in Survey Sampling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1013–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devroye, L. (1986), Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, W. (1859), “Letter to the Registrar-General on the Causes of Death in England in 1857,” Twentieth Annual Report of the Registrar-General of Births, Deaths, and Marriages in England, 5, 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Fienberg, S. (1970), “An Iterative Procedure for Estimation in Contingency Tables,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 907–917.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, C., and Kullback, S. (1968), “Contingency Tables with Given Marginals,” Biometrika, 55, 179–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerman, J. (2011), “Neutral Noninformative and Informative Conjugate Beta and Gamma Prior Distributions,” Electronic Journal of Statistics, 5, 1450–1470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F. (1968), “Association and Estimation in Contingency Tables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, K., Stuart, E., Vernick, J., and Webster, D. (2015), “Association between Connecticut’s Permit-to-purchase Handgun Law and Homocides,” American Journal of Public Health, 105, 49–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruschendorf, L. (1995), “Convergence of the Iterative Proportional Fitting Procedure,” The Annals of Statistics, 23, 1160–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., and Rao, J. (1995), “On the Adjustment of Gross Flow Estimates for Classification Error with Application to Data from the Canadian Labour Force Survey,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 478–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Bindman, R., Moghadassi, M., Wilson, N., Nelson, T., Boone, J., Cagnon, C., Gould, R., Hall, D., Krishnam, M., Lamba, R., McNitt-Gray, M., Seibert, A., and Miglioretti, D. (2015), “Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers,” Radiology, 277, 134–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, F. (1942), “An Iterative Method of Adjusting Sample Frequency Tables when Expected Marginal Totals are Known,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 13, 166–178.
   Google Scholar
• Woodard, D., Gelfrand, A., Barlow, W., and Elmore, J. (2007), “Performance Assessment for Radiologists Interpreting Screening Mammography,” Statistics in Medicine, 26, 1532–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, G. (1934), “On Some Points Relating to Vital Statistics, More Especially Statistics of Occupational Mortality,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 97, 1–84.
   Google Scholar