Shared Promises and Challenges of Coteaching: General-Special Education and Mentor Preservice Partnerships

REFERENCES

• Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about coteaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 245–255. doi:10.1177/074193250102200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacharach, N., Heck, T., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Changing the face of student teaching through co-teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1), 3–14. doi:10.1080/01626620.2010.10463538
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, N., Heck, T. W., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Utilizing co-teaching during the student teaching experience. St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN
   Google Scholar
• Badiali, B., & Titus, N. (2010). Co-teaching: Enhancing student learning through mentor‐ intern partnerships. School-University Partnerships, 4(2), 74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, A., Lancaster, J., Zundans, L., & Parkes, R. (2009). Embedding evidence based practice in pre-service teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 32(3), 215–225. doi:10.1177/0888406409339999
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, L., & Mainzer, R. (2003). Who’s teaching students with disabilities? Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(6), 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Butrymowicz, S. (2013, July 2). Indiana universities rethink student teaching. Hechinger Report. Retrieved 2014 from: http://hechingerreport.org/content/indiana-universities-rethink-student-teaching_12564/
   Google Scholar
• Benbow, C., & Holliday, T. (2013). CAEP accreditation standards and evidence: Aspirations for educator preparation. Retrieved from http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/commrpt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S. (2013). University of New Mexico College of Education student teaching program succeeds, expands. Retrieved 2014 from http://news.unm.edu/news/unm-college-of-education-student-teaching-program-succeeds;-expands
   Google Scholar
• Conderman, G. (2003). Using portfolios in undergraduate special education teacher education programs. Preventing School Failure, 47(3), 106–111.
   Google Scholar
• Conderman, G. (2011). Methods for approaching conflict in co-taught classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46, 221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., Bresnahan, V., & Pedersen, T. (2009). Purposeful co-teaching: Real cases and effective strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2014). Co-teaching with strategy instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(3), 156–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2011). Practical and proven strategies for co-teaching partners. Illinois Council for Exceptional Children Conference. Lisle, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2012). Purposeful assessment practices for co-teachers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 44(4), 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., & Johnston-Rodriguez, S. (2009). Beginning teachers’ views of their collaborative roles. Preventing School Failure, 53(4), 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., Morin, J., & Stephens, J. T. (2005). Special education student teaching practices. Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Co-teaching in student teaching. (2010). Teacher Quality Enhancement Center. MN: St. Cloud State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, E., Liston, A., Nevin, A., & Thousand, J. (2010). Co-teaching in urban secondary school districts to meet the needs of all teachers and learners: Implications for teacher education reform. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 6(2), 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, E., & Nevin, A. (2006). A mixed methodology analysis of co-teacher assessments. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 29, 261–274. doi:10.1177/088840640602900406
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., LePage, P., Hammerness, K., & Duffy, H. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council and the School Redesign Network at Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Dettmer, P., Thurston, L., Knackendoffel, A., & Dyck, N. (2009). Collaboration, consultation, and teamwork. Columbus, OH: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A. (2001). What are the characteristics of effective middle and high school co-taught teams for students with disabilities? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 46, 14–23. doi:10.1080/10459880109603339
   Google Scholar
• Dymond, S. K., Renzaglia, A., Halle, J. W., Chadsey, J., & Bentz, J. L. (2008). An evaluation of videoconferencing as a supportive technology for practicum supervision. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 31, 243–256. doi:10.1177/0888406408330645
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M. (2012). Co-teaching: beyond the basics with Dr. Marilyn Friend. Retrieved from http://www.nyccharterschools.org/events/co-teaching-beyond-basics-dr-marilyn-friend
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2013). Interactions: Collaborative skills for school professionals. Boston, MA: Pearson:.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., & Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9–27. doi:10.1080/10474410903535380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gately, S. E., & Gately, F. J. (2001). Understanding co-teaching components. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hang, Q., & Rabren, K. (2009). An examination of co-teaching: Perspectives and efficacy indicators. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 259–268. doi:10.1177/0741932508321018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbort, G., Gunter, P. L., Hull, K., Brown, Q., Venn, M. L., Wiley, L. P., & Wiley, E. W. (2007). Behaviors of teachers in co-taught classes in a secondary school. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 30, 13–23. doi:10.1177/088840640703000102
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2000). Research link/Preparing teachers for differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 82–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idol, L. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education: A program evaluation of eight schools. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 77–94. doi:10.1177/07419325060270020601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1415.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, E. B., & Moore, V. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us. American Secondary Journal, 32(3), 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgore, K., Griffin, C., Otis-Wilborn, A., & Winn, J. (2003). The problems of beginning special education teachers: Exploring the contextual factors influencing their work. Action in Teacher Education, 25(1), 38–47. doi:10.1080/01626620.2003.10463291
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Hughes, S. T., Schumm, J. S., & Elbaum, B. (1998). Outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lasisi, A. (2011). Teaching alternative licensed literacy teachers to learn from practice: A critical reflection model. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 169–189.
   Google Scholar
• Libler, R. (2010). Indiana state university professional development school partnership: Systemic, symbiotic, and solution-oriented, School-University. Partnerships, 4, 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. (2005). Co-teaching in middle school classrooms under routine conditions: Does the instructional experience differ for students with disabilities in co-taught and solo-taught classes? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 79–85. doi:10.1111/ldrp.2005.20.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Graetz, J., Norland, J., Gardizi, W., & McDuffie, K. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(5), 260–270. doi:10.1177/10534512050400050201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDuffie, K. A., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. (2009). Differential effects of peer tutoring in co-taught and non-co-taught classes: Results for content learning and student-teacher interactions. Exceptional Children, 75, 493–510. doi:10.1177/001440290907500406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, R. G. (2009). A national survey of pre-service preparation for collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 32(4), 379–393. doi:10.1177/0888406409346241
   Google Scholar
• Morningstar, M. E., Kim, K., & Clark, G. M. (2008). Evaluating a transition personnel preparation program: Identifying transition competencies of practitioners. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 31(1), 47–58. doi:10.1177/088840640803100105
   Google Scholar
• Murawski, W. W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve? Reading & Writing. Quarterly, 22, 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Murawski, W. W. (2008, November). What is really happening in co-taught classrooms? One state knows! Paper presented at Annual Teacher Education Division Conference, Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Murawski, W. W., & Dieker, L. (2004). Tips and strategies for co-teaching at the secondary level. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(5), 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Murawski, W. W., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258–267. doi:10.1177/074193250102200501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. (2004). The NASDTEC manual 2004 (5th ed.). Sacramento, CA: School Services of California, Inc. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Accreditation in Teacher Education (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Report to the blue ribbon panel on clinical preparation and partnerships for improved student learning. Washington, DC: . Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/publications
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education Blue Ribbon Panel. (2010, November). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Report to the blue ribbon panel on clinical preparation and partnerships for improved student learning. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/Public/ResearchReports/NCATEInitiatives/BlueRibbonPanel/tabid/715/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• No Author. (n.d.). Co-teaching: A strategy for successful teaching today and tomorrow. Kent State University. Retrieved from https://www.kent.edu/ehhs/tlcs/mat/co-teaching-strategy-successful-teaching-today-and-tomorrow
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425. (2001). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/
   Google Scholar
• Pancsofar, N., & Petroff, J. G. (2013). Professional development experiences in co-teaching: Associations with teacher confidence, interests, and attitudes. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 36, 83–96. doi:10.1177/0888406412474996
   Google Scholar
• Pugach, M. C. (2005). Research on preparing general education teachers to work with students with disabilities. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research in Teacher Education (pp. 549–590). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, P. J., McLaughlin, V. L., & Walther-Thomas, C. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pull-out programs. Exceptional Children, 72, 203–222.
   Google Scholar
• Rosman, N. J. (1994). Effects of varying the special educator’s role within an algebra class on math attitudes and achievement ( masters thesis). University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD.
   Google Scholar
• Scheeler, M. C., Congdon, M., & Stansbery, S. (2010). Providing immediate feedback to co-teachers through bug- in-ear technology: An effective method of peer coaching in inclusion classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 33, 83–96. doi:10.1177/0888406409357013
   Google Scholar
• Scheeler, M. C., McKinnon, K., & Stout, J. (2012). Effects of immediate feedback delivered via Webcam and bug-in-ear technology on pre-service teacher performance. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 35, 77–90. doi:10.1177/0888406411401919
   Google Scholar
• Scheetz, J., Waters, F. H., Smeaton, P., & Lare, D. (2005). Mentoring in a PDS Program: What’s in it for me? Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42, 33–37. doi:10.1080/00228958.2005.10532083
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392–416. doi:10.1177/001440290707300401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Self, H., Benning, A., Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. (1991). Cooperative teaching project: A model for students at risk. Exceptional Children, 58, 26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, R. J., & Magiera, K. (2007). Evaluation of co-teaching in three high schools within one school district: How do you know when you are TRULY co-teaching? Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 3(3), Article 4. Retrieved from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/vol3/iss3/art4
   Google Scholar
• Solis, M., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E., & McCulley, L. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 498–510. doi:10.1002/pits.v49.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strieker, T. (2013). Pre-service co-teaching: A mentor modeling approach. Kennesaw, GA: Kennesaw State University. Retrieved from https://education.kennesaw.edu/tqp/sites/education.kennesaw.edu.tqp/files/PSCT%20Handbook%20-%20TQP%20Website%205-2-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vannest, K. J., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2010). Teacher time use in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 126–142. doi:10.1177/0741932508327459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Elbaum, B., Schumm, J. S., & Hughes, T. (1998). Social outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 428–436. doi:10.1177/002221949803100502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. K. (2006). The impact of an alternative model of student teacher supervision: Views of the participants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 22–31. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement ( Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond, N., & Magiera, K. (2001). Current practice alerts: A focus on co- teaching. Use with caution. DLD Alerts, 6, 1–4.
   Google Scholar