Developing Distinct Mathematical and Scientific Pedagogical Content Knowledge in an Early Childhood Dual-Content Methods Course: An Alternative to Integration

References

• Ashbrook, P. (2006). Mixing and making changes: Preschool children can explore chemistry too. Science and Children, 43(5), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. L., Adams, S. M., & Kelly, M. K. (2009). Science at the center: An emergent standards-based child-centered framework for early learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(1), 71–77. doi:10.1007/s10643-009-0318-z
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide. American Educator, 29(1), 14–17, 20–22, 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Beldon, T. (2010). Me and my maths. Mathematics in School, 39(1), 34–35.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1992). Report from the NSF/SSMA Wingspread Conference: A network for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 92(6), 340–342. doi:10.1111/ssm.1992.92.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Bonotto, C. (2013). Artifacts as sources for problem-posing activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 37–55. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9441-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, S. M. (2013). Why do research in pure mathematics? Bulletin of the Irish Mathematical Society, 72, 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. (1989/2008). Mathematics: Assessing understanding [DVD]. United States: ETA/Cuisenaire.
   Google Scholar
• Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1997). Unleashing the power of perceptual change: The promise of brain based teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Cardetti, F., & Truxaw, M. P. (2014). Toward improving the mathematics preparation of elementary pre-service teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 114(1), 1–9. doi:10.1111/ssm.2014.114.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Charles, R. I. (2005). Big ideas and understandings as the foundation for elementary and middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 7(13), 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, R., & Lind, K. K. (2007). Math & science for young children (5th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomas Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, D., & Sandow, D. (2011). “Why did you do that?” Reasoning in algebra classrooms. Mathematics Teacher, 104(6), 460–464.
   Google Scholar
• Cwikla, J. (2014). Can kindergartners do fractions? Teaching Children Mathematics, 20(6), 354–364. doi:10.5951/teacchilmath.20.6.0354
   Google Scholar
• College & Career Readiness Technology Solution | Naviance. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.naviance.com
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., & Keller, J. D. (2009). Exploring science and mathematics in a child’s world. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, M., & Yeh, C. (2008). Creative arithmetic: Exploring alternative methods. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(6), 367–368.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding-Wells, J., Dole, S., & Makar, K. (2014). Inquiry pedagogy to promote emerging proportional reasoning in primary students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(1), 47–77. doi:10.1007/s13394-013-0111-6
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J. M., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127–141. doi:10.1111/ssm.2005.105.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J. M., & Meyer, M. R. (2002). Is it science? Is it mathematics? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(9), 502–508.
   Google Scholar
• Gerde, H. K., Schachter, R. E., & Wasik, B. A. (2013). Using the scientific method to guide learning: An integrated approach to early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 315–323. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0579-4
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education & Development, 20, 238–264. doi:10.1080/10409280802595441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 170–218. doi:10.2307/749074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics. Review of Science, Mathematics, and ICT Education, 7(2), 9–33.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1997). Minds of our own [DVD]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
   Google Scholar
• Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(1), 96–122.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., Lake, V. E., & Dagli, U. (2005). Integration of science and mathematics methods and pre-service teachers’ understanding of constructivism. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 25, 165–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, J., Cooper, D., & Bethea, K. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in their teaching: A framework for research applied to a study of student teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(3), 223–252. doi:10.1023/A:1025175812582
   Google Scholar
• Kalchman, M., & Kozoll, R. H. (2012). Co-teaching a dual content-area methods class: Considering context for evaluating collaborative intensity. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kalchman, M., Moss, J., & Case, R. (2001). Psychological models for the development of understanding: Rational numbers and functions. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Pre-school teachers’ content knowledge in science: Their understanding of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by 369 children’s questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165–179. doi:10.1080/09669760120086929
   Google Scholar
• Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (2000). First graders dividing 62 by 5: A teacher uses Piaget’s theory (videotape). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (1989). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1997). Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics? School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 57–58. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17342.x
   Google Scholar
• Louisell, R. (2015). I do, and I understand: Helping young children discover science and mathematics. Minneapolis, MN: Constructivist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, P. A., & Flessner, R. (2012). Collaborating to improve inquiry-based teaching in elementary science and mathematics methods courses. Science Education International, 23(4), 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Mogil, H. M. (2006). Fabulous weather day. Science and Children, 44(5), 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• McDuffie, A. R., & Morrison, J. A. (2008). Learning about data display: Mathematics and science inquiry. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(6), 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• Moomaw, S., Carr, V., Boat, M., & Barnett, D. (2010). Preschoolers number sense. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(6), 332–340.
   Google Scholar
• Moomaw, S., & Davis, J. A. (2010). STEM comes to preschool. Young Children, 65(5), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prairie, A. P. (2005). Inquiry into math, science, and technology for teaching young children. Clifton Park, NY: Thomas Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Regents of the University of California. (2007). FOSS™ fabric (2nd ed.). Nashua, NH: Delta Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sackes, M., Flevares, L. M., Gonya, J., & Trundle, K. C. (2012). Pre-service early childhood teachers’ sense of efficacy for integrating mathematics and science: Impact of a methods course. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33, 349–364. doi:10.1080/10901027.2012.732666
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, A. (2002). Constructivism and student misconceptions: Why every teacher needs to know about them. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 48(4), 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, D. S. (2015). In defense of pure mathematics. American Scientist, 103(6), 418–421. doi:10.1511/2015.117.418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. C., Cowan, J. L., & Culp, A. M. (2009). Growing seeds and scientists: Kindergartners become a community of scientists as they explore seeds and plant growth. Science and Children, 47(1), 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Solis, A. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge: What matters most in the professional learning of content teachers in classrooms with diverse student populations. Retrieved from www.idra.org/IDRA_Newsletter/August_2009_Actionable_Knowledge/Pedagogical_Content_Knowledge/
   Google Scholar
• Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration: Models and characterizations. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Wearne, D., Hiebert, J., & Campbell, P. (1994). Place value addition and subtraction. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(5), 272–275.
   Google Scholar
• Whitenack, J. W., Knipping, N., Loesing, J., Kim, O., & Beetsma, A. (2002). Starting off the school year with opportunities for all: Supporting first graders’ development of number sense. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(1), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., Forbes, C., & Biggers, M. (2012). This is inquiry right?: Strategies for effectively adapting elementary science lessons. Science and Children, 50(1), 48–53.
   Google Scholar