Exploring Connections between Writing Methods Teacher Education Courses and K-12 Field Experience

References

• Alsup, J. (2001). Seeking connection: An English educator speaks across a disciplinary ‘contact zone’. English Education, 34(1), 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, J., Szabo, S., Raine, L., & Wickstrom, C. (2015). Bridging the stories of experience: Preservice teachers revise their thinking about writing and the teaching of writing in an undergraduate literacy course. In S. Vasinda, S. Szabo, & R. D. Johnson (Eds.), Bridging cultures through literacy: The thirty-seventh yearbook: A double peer-reviewed publication of the Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers (Vol. 37, pp. 225–238). Commerce, TX: Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology on knowledge. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, R., Llyod-Jones, R., & Schoer, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6626–6628). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, P., & Tracy, K. N. (2017). Elementary teachers leading from the classroom. In C. Rogers, K. Lomotey, & A. Hilton (Eds.), Innovative approaches to educational leadership: Selected cases (pp. 95- – 104). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, J. H. (2009). Do as i say and do as i do: Using the professor-in-residence model in teaching social studies methods. The Social Studies, 100(3), 121–128. doi:10.3200/TSSS.100.3.121-128
   Google Scholar
• Calfee, R., & Miller, R. G. (2013). Best practices for writing assessment for instruction. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L., Ehrenworth, M., & Lehman, C. (2012). Pathways to the common core: Accelerating achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cambourne, B. (1999). Conditions for literacy learning: Turning learning theory into classroom instruction. A mini case study. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 414–429.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, I. (2009). Back to the classroom: Lessons learned from a professor serving as a master teacher in a secondary mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Colby, S. A., & Stapleton, J. N. (2006). Preservice teachers teach writing: Implications for teacher educators. Reading Research and Instruction, 45(4), 353–376. doi:10.1080/19388070609558455
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013a). Annual report. Retrieved from http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/annualreport_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013b). CAEP accreditation standards and evidence: Aspirations for educator preparation. Retrieved from http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/commrpt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. doi:10.1177/0022487105285962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, S. (1999). Integrating reading and writing to teach compare-contrast text structure: A research-based methodology. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15, 49–79. doi:10.1080/105735699278297
   Google Scholar
• Dillion, D. (2017). Straddling teacher candidates’ two worlds to link practice and theory: A self-study of successful and unsuccessful efforts. Studying Teacher Education, 13(2), 145–164. doi:10.1080/17425964.2017.1342352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. (2002). Visioning and the development of outstanding teachers. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(4), 331–343. doi:10.1080/19388070209558375
   Google Scholar
• Dutro, E., Cartun, A., Melnychenko, K., Haberl, E., Williams, B. P., & Zenkov, K. (2017). Partnership literacies in a writing methods course: Practicing, advocating, and feeling together. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(5), 585–588. doi:10.1002/jaal.630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 161–171. doi:10.1177/0022487109347874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearn, L., & Farnan, N. (2005). An investigation of the influence of teaching grammar in writing to accomplish an influence on writing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 251–272. doi:10.1086/499668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, M. M., & Isaacson, S. (2001). Using the new basals to teach the writing process: Modifications for students with learning problems. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 15, 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. (1998). Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2013). Writing standards. In L. M. Morrow, K. K. Wixson, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Teaching with the common core standards for English language arts: Grades 3-5 (pp. 88–106). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27(6), 1015–1042. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. (2011). Informing writing: The benefits of formative assessment. A Report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1994). Implications of constructivism for teaching writing to students with special needs. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 275–289. doi:10.1177/002246699402800304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2013). Designing an effective writing program. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (2nd ed., pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chambers, A. B. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 211–226). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 710–785. doi:10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547. doi:10.1086/681947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (2013). Best practices in writing instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. (1982). A case study observing the development of primary children’s composing, spelling, and motor behaviors during the writing process: Final report. Durham: New Hampshire University, Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2011). Writing instruction for teacher candidates: Strengthening a weak curricular area. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(4), 348–364. doi:10.1080/19388071.2010.532581
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Valencia, S. W., Thompson, C., Martin, S. D., Place, N., & Evans, K. (2001). Transitions into teaching: Learning to teach writing in teacher education and beyond. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the agenda (pp. 80–99). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. J. (1962). An experimental inquiry into the functions and value of formal grammar in the teaching of English, with special reference to the teaching of correct written English to children aged twelve to fourteen ( Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of London, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. F., Wood, N. J., & Shawgo, M. (2007). Teaching and learning language arts: From campus to classroom and back again. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(4), 226–234. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.4.226-234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G., Jr. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93, 133–170. doi:10.1086/443789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G., Jr. (1987). Synthesis of research on teaching writing. Educational Leadership, 44(8), 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoge, J. D., & Jenks, C. (2000). Professors in K-12 classrooms: Rewards, risks, and recommendations. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Council for the Social Studies, San Antonio, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Holdaway, D. (1984). The foundations of literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Myhill, D., & Bailey, T. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualized grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241–1263. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9416-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Experiential learning theory. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1215–1219). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M., & Trachtman, R. (1997). Making professional development schools work: Politics, practice, and policy. The series on school reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2018). Investigating differences in teacher practices through a complexity theory lens: The influence of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 22–39. doi:10.1177/0022487117702573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. N., & Pytash, K. E. (2014). Preparing preservice teachers to become teachers of writing: A 20-year review of the research literature. English Education, 47(1), 6–37.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J., Grisham, D. L., Scales, R., Wolsey, T. D., Smetana, L., Dismuke, S., … Martin, S. (2016). What about writing? Literacy teacher educators speak to writing instruction in initial teacher preparation programs. Journal of Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(4), 309–330. doi:10.1080/19388071.2016.1198442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected R: The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved from http://www.writingcommission.org/report.html
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers: Report of the blue ribbon panel on clinical preparation and partnerships for improved student learning. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for english language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and schools. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C.A. § 6301 et seq. (West 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54. doi:10.2307/41165942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, L. S. (2006). The role of context in learning to teach writing. What teacher educators need to know to support beginning urban teachers? Journal of Teacher Education, 57(4), 378–394. doi:10.1177/0022487106291563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnegar, S. (2017). Understanding field experiences: The zone of maximal contact and the conundrums and sacred stories in teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 13(2), 210–215. doi:10.1080/17425964.2017.1342359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, G. (2017). The power of community partnership in the preparation of teachers. The Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 6–8. doi:10.1177/0022487116679959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, T. (2013). Fearless writing: Multigenre to motivate and inspire. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T., & Schilperoord, J. (2006). Text structure as a window on the cognition of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The handbook of writing research (pp. 386–402). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., Kindall, H. D., Carter, V., & Beachner, M. (2016). Impact of adopt-a-classroom partnerships between K-12 and university faculty. School Community Journal, 26(1), 163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Symcox, L. (2012). Forging new partnerships: Collaboration between university professors and classroom teachers to improve history teaching, 1983-2011. The History Teacher, 45(3), 359–382.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. (2017). Self-study and practicum learning. Studying Teacher Education, 13(2), 123–126. doi:10.1080/17425964.2017.1342345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia, G. (2007). Research in writing instruction: What we know and what we need to know. In M. Pressley, A. K. Billman, K. H. Perry, K. E. Reffitt, & J. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need (pp. 129–156). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulley, C. E. (2013). What are preservice teachers taught about the teaching of writing?: A survey of Ohio’s undergraduate writing methods courses. Teaching/Writing: the Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 2(1), 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tulley, C. E. (2016). A course no one wants to teach: A brief history of the undergraduate writing methods course. Teaching/Writing: the Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 5(1), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, A. E., Olcese, N., & Squier, V. (2015). “It sounds wrong” vs. “I would be curious” Challenges in seeing students as writers in a school-university partnership. Teaching/Writing: the Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 4(2), 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbrunn, S., & Krause, K. (2012). Conversations with leaders: Principles of effective writing instruction. The Reading Teacher, 65(5), 346–353. doi:10.1002/trtr.2012.65.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar