Pedagogical Language Knowledge: An Investigation of a Science Teacher Candidate’s Student Teaching Strengths and Struggles

References

• Aalto, E., & Tarnanen, M. (2015). Approaching pedagogical language knowledge through student teachers: Assessment of second language writing. Language and Education, 29(5), 400–415. doi:10.1080/09500782.2015.1031676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achieve, Next Gen Science Storylines & STEM Teaching Tools. (2016). Using phenomena in NGSS-designed lessons and units. STEM teaching tools initiative, institute for science + math education. Seattle: University of Washington. Retrieved from http://stemteachingtools.org/brief/42Authors
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, M. (2017). Cultivating teacher knowledge of the role of language in science: A model of elementary grade pre-service teacher preparation. In A. W. Oliveira & M. H. Weinburgh (Eds.), Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition (pp. 25–40). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (1995). Adult learning: An overview. International Encyclopedia of Education, 10, 375–380.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341. doi:10.3102/0091732X12461772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton, C., & Lee, O. (2014). English language learners in science education. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed., pp. 204–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, C. A., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Rodríguez, Y. H., Aghasaleh, R., Cardozo-Gaibisso, L., & Kirmaci, M. (2017). A design-based model of teacher professional learning in the LISELL-B Project. In A. W. Oliveira & M. H. Weinburgh (Eds.), Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition (pp. 215–234). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, A., & Mulloy, M. (2010). How do cognitive and motivational factors influence teachers’ degree of program implementation?: A qualitative examination of teacher perspectives. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27(4), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Framework for English language proficiency development standards corresponding to the common core state standards and the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: CCSSO.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76, 383–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araujo, Z., Smith, E., & Sakow, M. (2016). Reflecting on the dialogue regarding the mathematics education of English learners. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2), 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L. C., Obenchain, K. M., Kenney, R. H., & Oliveira, A. W. (2019). Teaching the content areas to English language learners in secondary schools. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 177–181.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galguera, T. (2011). Participant structures as professional learning tasks and the development of pedagogical language knowledge among preservice teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Gandara, P., & Maxwell-Jolly, J. (2006). Critical issues in developing teacher corps for English learners. In K. Tellex & H. C. Waxman (Eds.), Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies, and practices (pp. 99–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education (pp. 63–77). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language scaffolding learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, L. A., Fitts, S., Goodson-Espy, T., & Clark, A. M. (2010). Self as teacher: Preliminary role identification of the potential teaching candidate. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text. Victoria, UK: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., Walqui, A., & Linquanti, R. (2015). English language learners and the new standards: Developing language, content knowledge, and analytical practices in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G., Gillis, V., & Leonard, J. (2014). Disciplinary literacy, English learners, and STEM education. Action in Teacher Education, 36(3), 187–191.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54, 586–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., & Van Booven, C. D. (2016). Elementary teachers’ science knowledge and instructional practices: Impact of an intervention focused on English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 579–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 275–289.
   Google Scholar
• Linquanti, R., Cook, H. G., Bailey, A. L., & MacDonald, R. (2016). Moving toward a more common definition of English learner: Collected guidance for states and multi-state assessment. Consortia. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Llosa, L., Van Booven, C., & Lee, O. (2015). Teaching content standards to English language learners: Elementary science teachers’ use of language development strategies and students’ home language. NYS TESOL Journal, 2(2), 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Maerten-Rivera, J., Ahn, S., Lanier, K., Diaz, J., & Lee, O. (2016). Science achievement over a three-year curricular and professional development intervention with English language learners in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 116(4), 600–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNew-Birren, J., & van den Kieboom, L. A. (2017). Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: An interpretive case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 74–87. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). English learners in STEM subjects: Transforming classrooms, schools, and Lives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2009). Position statement: Science for English language learners. Retrieved from https://www.nsta.org/about/positions/ell.aspx
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, N. (1997). Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educational Action Research, 5(1), 172–176. doi:10.1080/09650799700200020
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. doi:10.1126/science.1182595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2012). Language demands and opportunities in relation to next generation science standards for English language learners: What teachers need to know. Retrieved from https://ell.stanford.edu/publication/understandinglanguage-conference
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. Boston, MA: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samson, J. F., & Collins, B. A. (2012). Preparing all teachers to meet the needs of English language learners: Applying research to policy and practice. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, M., Darling-Hammond, L., & Cheuk, T. (2012). Teacher development to support English language learners in the context of common core state standards. Retrieved from https://ell.stanford.edu/publication/understanding-language-conference
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. M., Lyon, E. G., Stoddart, T., Mosqueda, E., & Menon, P. (2014). Improving science and literacy learning for English language learners: Evidence from a pre-service teacher preparation intervention. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(5), 621–643. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9376-6
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetana, L., & Heineke, A. J. (2017). Preparing science teachers for English learners: A targeted and integrated approach to pre-service teacher education. In A. Oliveria & M. Weinburgh (Eds.), Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition (pp 137–159). New York, NY: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Smetana, L., & Heineke, A. J. (2017). Preparing science teachers for English learners: A targeted and integrated approach to pre-service teacher education. In A. Oliveria & M. Weinburgh (Eds.), Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition (pp. 137–159). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Solís, J. L., & Bunch, G. (2016). Responsive approaches for teaching English learners in secondary science classrooms: Foundations of the SSTELLA framework. In E. Lyon, S. Tolbert, J. L. Solís, T. Stoddart, & G. Bunch (Eds.), Secondary science teaching for English learners: Developing supportive and responsive learning contexts for sense-making and language development (pp. 21–48). Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddart, T., Solis, J. L., Lyon, E. G., & Tolbert, S. (2017). Preparing pre-service secondary teachers to teach science to English learners: Theory into practice. In A. Oliveira & M. Weinburgh (Eds.), Science teacher preparation in content-based second language (pp. 97-115).  New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664–687. doi: 10.1002/tea.10040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Téllez, K., & Waxman, H. C. (2006). Preparing quality teachers for English language learners: An overview of the critical issues. In K. Téllez & H. C. Waxman (Eds.), Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies, and practices (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). The condition of education 2018 (2018-144). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=96
   Google Scholar
• VanLier, L., & Walqui, A. (2012). Language and the common core state standards. In K. Hakuta & M. Santos (Co-chairs). Commissioned papers on language and literacy issues in the common core state standards and next generation science standards (Vol. 94, pp.44). Palo Alto, CA: Understanding Language.
   Google Scholar
• Walqui, A., & Heritage, M. (2012). Instruction for diverse groups of English language learners. Retrieved from https://ell.stanford.edu/publication/understanding-language-conference
   Google Scholar
• Walqui, A., & van Lier, L. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• Zwiep, S. G., & Straits, W. J. (2013). Inquiry science: The gateway to English language proficiency. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(8), 1315–1331. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9357-9
   Google Scholar
• Zwiep, S. G., Straits, W. J., Stone, K. R., Beltran, D. D., & Furtado, L. (2011). The integration of English language development and science instruction in elementary classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(8), 769–785. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9254-z
   Google Scholar