Teaching Writing in the Midst of Fragile Alliances: Insights from Literacy Teacher Educators

References

• Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
   Google Scholar
• Barone, D. (2006). High-stakes assessment and writing instruction. In J. V. Hoffman, D. L. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), 55th yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 99–109). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, N., & Pang, M. E. (2016). Awaiting a new wave: The status of state writing assessment in the United States. Assessing Writing, 29, 25–41. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, K. (2013). Warnings from the trenches. Academe, 99(1), 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, C. N., & Hyland, K. (2014). Writing: Texts, processes and practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, M. (1999). Situated, social, active: Rewriting genre in elementary classroom. Written Communication, 16(4), 469–490. doi:10.1177/0741088399016004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Mora-Flores, E. (2006). Balanced literacy for English language learners, K-2. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. E. (2013). Practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Coia, L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Writing in the self: Teachers writing autobiographies as a social endeavor. In D. L. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch, & J. V. Hoffman (Eds.), 51st yearbook of the National Reading Conference(pp. 142–152). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, B., & Nixon, H. (2011). Critical reading comprehension in an era of accountability. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(2), 167. doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0022-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2000). Narrative understandings of teacher knowledge. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(4), 315–331.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, T. (2006). Creativity, uncertainty, and discomfort: Teachers as writers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 415–433. doi:10.1080/03057640600866023
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. (2015). The search for inclusion: Deficit discourse and the erasure of childhoods. Language Arts, 92(3), 199.
   Google Scholar
• Early, J. S., & Saidy, C. (2014). A study of a multiple component feedback approach to substantive revision for secondary ELL and multilingual writers. Reading and Writing, 27(6), 995–1014. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9483-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischman, S., & Heppen, J. (2009). Improving low-performing high schools: Searching for evidence of promise. The Future of Children, 19(1), 105–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K., & Ntelioglou, B. Y. (2011). Which new literacies? Dialogue and performance in youth writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(5), 322–330. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.5.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 494–518. doi:10.1086/651193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2005). Improving writing: Comparing the responses of eighth graders, preservice teachers and experienced teachers. Reading & Writing Quaterly, 21(4), 315–330. doi:10.1080/10573560591002259
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, D. H., & Cole, M. (1995). Between discourse and schema: Reformulating a cultural-historical approach to culture and mind. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(4), 475–489. doi:10.1525/aeq.1995.26.4.05x1065y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janesick, V. J. (2004). ‘stretching’exercises for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. (2010). Improving literacy achievement in a high‐poverty school: Empowering classroom teachers through professional development. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 384–387. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinloch, V. (2009). Suspicious spatial distinctions: Literacy research with students across school and community contexts. Written Communication, 26(2), 154–182. doi:10.1177/0741088309332899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, J. (1999). Analyzing participation frameworks in kindergarten writing activity. Written Communication, 16(2), 225–257. doi:10.1177/0741088399016002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majors, Y. J. (2003). Shoptalk: Teaching and learning in an African American hair salon. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(4), 289–310. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1004_3
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Bertrand, M., & Huguet, A. (2015). Using data to alter instructional practice. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. P. (2013). My time as a professor in residence: Lessons learned. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(8), 617–622. doi:10.1002/JAAL.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. N., & Pytash, K. E. (2014). Preparing preservice teachers to become teachers of writing: A 20-year review of the research literature. English Education, 47(1), 6–37.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, G. (2015). Iqra: African American Muslim girls reading and writing for social change. Written Communication, 32(3), 286–316. doi:10.1177/0741088315590136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J., Scales, R. Q., Grisham, D. L., Wolsey, T. D., Dismuke, S., & Smetana, L., ... & Martin, S. (2016). What about writing? A national exploratory study of writing instruction in teacher preparation programs. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(4), 309–330.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education Blue Ribbon Panel. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142–179. doi:10.1177/0741088312438529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., Verlaan, W., Cheek, E. H., & DiMarco, D. (2016). Rethinking writing products and processes in a digital age. In E. Ortlieb, E. H. Cheek Jr., & W. Verlaan (Eds.), Writing instruction to support literacy success (pp. 1–17). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., Cheek, E. H., Jr, & Verlaan, W. (Eds.). (2016). Writing instruction to support literacy success. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, N. G., & Perhamus, L. M. (2015). The rubricization of teacherhood and studenthood: Intertextuality, identity, and the standardization of self. In M. Tenam-Zemach & J. E. Flynn (Eds.), Rubric nation: Critical inquiries on the impact of rubrics in education (pp. 21–33). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, S., Grabill, J. T., Brunk-Chavez, B., More, J. L., Rosinski, P., & Curan, P. G. (2013). Ubiquitous writing, technologies, and the social practice of literacies and coordination. Written Communication, 31(1), 91–117. doi:10.1177/0741088313514023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, F., & Pierce, M. (2013). “When do we get to read?” Reading instruction and literacy coaching in a “failed” urban elementary school. Reading Improvement, 50(3), 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quartz, K. H., Weinstein, R. S., Kaufman, G., Levine, H., Mehan, H., Pollock, M., … Worrell, F. C. (2017). University-partnered new school designs: Fertile ground for research–practice partnerships. Educational Researcher, 46(3), 143–146. doi:10.3102/0013189X17703947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Scarbrough, B., & Allen, A. R. (2014). Writing workshop revisited: Confronting communicative dilemmas through spoken word poetry in a high school English classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(4), 475–505. doi:10.1177/1086296X15568929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Frier, A. D., & Schneider, J. J. (2014). Negotiating American history: Bilingual learners collaboratively compose information texts. In J. S. Schneider (Ed.), Casework in K-6 writing instruction: Connecting composing strategies, digital literacies, and disciplinary content to the Common Core (pp. 193–204). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wahleithner, J. M. (2018). Five portraits of teachers’ experiences teaching writing: Negotiating knowledge, student need and policy. Teachers College Record, 120(1), nl.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2006). Rethinking rubrics in writing assessment. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Yagelski, R. P. (2012). Writing as praxis. English Education, 44(2), 188–204.
   Google Scholar