How Feedback from Mentor Teachers Sustained Student Teachers through Their First Year of Teaching

References

• Agudo, J. D. M. (2016). What type of feedback do student teachers expect from their school mentors during practicum experience? The case of Spanish EFL student teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2018). A pivot toward clinical practice, it’s lexicon, and the renewal of educator preparation: A report of the AACTE clinical practice commission. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Institute for Research. (2015). Mentoring guide for teacher induction: Guidance for mentors and beginning teachers. Retrieved from https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/te/mentoring.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anast-May, L., Penick, D., Schroyer, R., & Howell, A. (2011). Teacher conferencing and feedback: Necessary but missing! International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. P., Gilbert, L. S., & Martin, E. P. (2007). The first years of teaching: Disparities in perceptions of support. Action in Teacher Education, 28(4), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, L. U. (2010). Educative mentoring: Promoting reform-based science teaching through mentoring relationships. Science Education, 94(6), 1049–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, C. (2008). Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. ELT Journal, 62(1), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should know and be able to do (pp. 40–71). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. S., & Fantozzi, V. B. (2016). What do student teachers want in mentor teachers? Desired, expected, possible, and emerging roles. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(3), 250–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, E. J. (2007). Quality feedback: The essential ingredient for teacher success. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80(4), 191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S., & Beasley, K. (1997). Mentoring as assisted performance: A case of co-planning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education (pp. 108–126). New York, NY: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (1998). Teachers as teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21(1), 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001a). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. The Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001b). Helping novices learn to teach lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, B. B., Hernández, A., García, C. T., & Claeys, L. (2011). Teacher academy induction learning community: Guiding teachers through their zone of proximal development. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(3), 365–389.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A. R., & Wilson, E. G. (2015). Networking and the development of professionals: Beginning teachers building social capital. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014). Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task. Instructional Science, 42, 861–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, L. (2016). Support from the start: A 50-state review of policies on new educator induction and mentoring. Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center.
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., & Schuermann, P. (2015). Make room value added principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger, H., Mutton, T., & Burn, K. (2011). Surprising but not shocking: The reality of the first year of teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. The Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, P. (2016). Identifying mentors? Observations for providing feedback. Teachers and Teaching, 22(2), 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2012). What the research tells us about the impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers. National Society for the Study of Education, 111(2), 466–490.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, S. (2014). Understanding beginning teacher induction: A contextualized examination of best practice. Cogent Education, 1(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 154–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. S., & Lees, A. T. (2016). Preparing undergraduate pre-service teachers through direct and video-based performance feedback and tiered supports in early head start. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 369–379. doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0725-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, P. J., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2005). Mind activity in teaching and mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 679–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Rase:Remedial & Special Education, 11(6), 7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., Takahashi, S., & White, T. (2014). Developing an effective teacher feedback system. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, M. J., & Miller-Day, M. (2007). Upward turning points and positive rapport-development across time in researcher—Participant relationships. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 177–201.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pylman, S., Stanulis, R. N., & Wexler, L. J. (2017). Mentors as teacher educators: Inquiry as professional development. In C. M. Crawford & S. L. Hardy (Eds.), Dynamic principles of professional development: Essential elements of effective teacher preparation (pp. 1–16). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sabar, N. (2004). From heaven to reality through crisis: Novice teachers as migrants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sayeski, K. L., & Paulsen, K. J. (2012). Student teacher evaluations of cooperating teachers as indices of effective mentoring. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(2), 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Scherff, L. (2008). Disavowed: The stories of two novice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1317–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner:Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shoulders, C. W., Edgar, D., & Bolton, A. (2016). Variability versus continuity: Student teachers’ perceptions of two university supervision formats. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(2), 161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanulis, R. N., & Bell, J. (2017). Beginning teachers improve with attentive and targeted mentoring. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 53(2), 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Stanulis, R. N., & Floden, R. E. (2009). Intensive mentoring as a way to help beginning teachers develop balanced instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanulis, R. N., Wexler, L. J., Pylman, S., Guenther, A., Farver, S., Ward, A., … White, K. (2019). Mentoring as more than “cheerleading”: Looking at educative mentoring practices through mentors’ eyes. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 567–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevethan, H. (2017). Educative mentors? The role of classroom teachers in initial teacher education. A New Zeland study. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(2), 219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1107–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers’ teaching: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., Keeling, D., Schunck, J., Palcisco, A., & Morgan, K. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED515656
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (16th pr). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werstch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins‐Canter, E. A. (1997). The nature and effectiveness of feedback given by cooperating teachers to student teachers. The Teacher Educator, 32(4), 235–249. doi:10.1080/08878739709555150
   Google Scholar