Does the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR) mobilize the municipal level? City twinning in Northern Europe

References

• Andersen, D. J. 2014. “Do You Dare: Reflections on (Un)familiarity, Identity-Formation and Ontological Politics.” Journal of Borderland Studies 29 (3): 327–338. doi:10.1080/08865655.2014.938966.
   Google Scholar
• Boman, J., and E. Berg. 2007. “Identity and Institutions Shaping Cross-border Co-operation at the Margins of the European Union.” Regional and Federal Studies 17 (2): 195–215. doi:10.1080/13597560701318516.
   Google Scholar
• Buursink, J. 1994. “Dubbelsteden.” Acta Geographica Lovaniensia 34: 175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Buursink, J. 2001. “The Bionational Reality of Border-Crossing Cities.” Geojournal 54 (1): 7–19. doi:10.1023/A:1021180329607.
   Google Scholar
• Duchacek, I. 1990. “Perforated Sovereignties: Towards a Typology of New Actors in International Relations.” In Federalism and International Relations: The Role of Subnational Units, ed.by H. Michelmann, and P. Soldatos, 1–33. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers, N. 2001. “The Utopia of the Bionational Cities.” Geojournal 54 (1): 21–32. doi:10.1023/A:1021132413677.
   Google Scholar
• Hanell, T., and J. Neubauer. 2005. Cities in the Baltic Sea Region – Development Trends at the Turn of the Millennium. Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Hurskainen, S. 2005. “Case of Imatra-Svetogorsk: An Example from the Field.” In Northern Dimension, Poland and the New Neighbors, eds M. Kulmala, and L. Paiviö, 132–136. Helsinki: The Finnish Commission for European Security.
   Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, P., and A. Sergunin. 2011. “When Two Aspire to Become One: City-Twinning in Northern Europe.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 26 (2): 231–242. doi:10.1080/08865655.2011.641323.
   Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, P., and A. Sergunin. 2014. “Paradiplomacy as a Capacity-Building Strategy.” Problems of Post-Communism 61 (6): 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhle, B. 2005. “Town Twinning.” Jumelage. Kommunale Partnerschaften. Wien: Universität zur Weiterbildung Krems.
   Google Scholar
• Kopstein, J., and D. Reilly. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Post-communist World.” World Politics 53 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1017/S0043887100009369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala, J. (2000). Cooperation as a Tool for Border Development. Two Cases from the European North. Licenciate thesis. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsov, A. S. 2015. Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy. Subnational Governments in International Affairs. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lankina, T., and L. Getachew. 2006. “A Geographic Incremental Theory of Democratization: Territory, Aid, and Democracy in Post-communist Regions.” World Politics 58 (4): 536–582. doi:10.1353/wp.2007.0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundén, T., and D. Zalamans. 2001. “Local Co-operation, Ethnic Diversity and State Territoriality – the Case of Haparanda and Tornio on the Sweden-Finland Border.” GeoJournal 54 (1): 33–42. doi:10.1023/A:1021184430515.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, H., D. Jajeśniak-Quast, and K. Stokłosa. 2002. Twin Towns on the Border as Laboratories of European Integration. Frankfurt (Oder): Frankfurter Institut für Transformationsstudien.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2001. Transnational Urbanism. Locating Globalization. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Soldatos, P. 1990. “An Explanatory Framework for the Study of Federal States as Foreign-policy Actors.” In Federalism and International Relations: The Role of Subnational Units, ed. by H. Michelmann, and P. Soldatos, 34–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spierings, B., and M. van der Velde. 2013. “Cross-Border Differences and Unfamiliarity: Shopping Mobility in the Dutch-German Rhine-Waal Euroregion.” European Planning Studies 21 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.716236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, C. (2008). Joint Report by Inverness City Manager and Chairman, the City of Inverness Town Twinning Committee. On-line available at file://filgrms1/u09$/stefang/Downloads/ICC9908.pdf (accessed October 24, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Union of the Baltic Cities. (2010). Cities for a Sustainable and Prosperous Baltic Sea Region. UBC Strategy 2010–2015. On-line available at http://www.ubc.net/sites/default/files/ubc_strategy.pdf (accessed October 24, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Way, L., and S. Levitsky. 2007. “Linkage, Leverage, and the Post-Communist Divide.” East European Politics and Societies 21 (1): 48–66. doi:10.1177/0888325406297134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalamans, D. 2008. “Mental and Physical Borderlines in the Baltic Sea Region.” On-line available at (accessed October 24, 2016). http://www.indepsocres.spb.ru/zalam_e.htm
   Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, W. 1991. “The Twinning of the World: Sister Cities in Geographic and Historical Perspective.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1991.tb01676.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar